Contents

User talk:Khrincan

Hi Khrincan! I noticed your contributionstoChris Sutton and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Mattythewhite (talk) 22:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HiKhrincan, have you edited Wikipedia under a different username before? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:40, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @ToBeFree, to answer your question, I never edited Wikipedia under a different username before I made this account. Khrincan (talk) 00:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Khrincan (talk) 00:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am new here, i just mistakenly removed some content:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckyesps (talk • contribs) 02:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just remember to explain why you delete article material in your edit summaries. Khrincan (talk) 02:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

DanCherek (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not get why someone with all of two months' experience editing is correcting other editors rather than proving their own worth. Your revert of my edits to the David Behan article are absurd. Now I have to redo them. If you don't know what you are doing, don't do it. 107.122.161.51 (talk) 23:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey IP, I'm sorry for reverting your edits by mistake, as I thought the diff showed that you removed a paragraph. I looked back to your revision, scrolled down, and found that it was just a paragraph break. I'm also sorry you had to redo your work; you can use the undo button next to the revision to go back without doing too much work. Thanks for letting me know. Khrincan (talk) 23:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	you have only been on here for a couple months,and are already doing great things to help the Wikipedia community.i applauded you for that,and I would love to see you keep going! cheers!~ ItsMeKeys (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsMeKeys: Thank you so much! Khrincan (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Khrincan no problem! new editors can learn quite a bit from you! cheers!~ ItsMeKeys (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Khrincan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:51, Friday, January 13, 2023 (UTC)

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Please restore my edits, which you reverted without discussion or explanation. The POV link used for half the article is dead as a doornail. 107.127.46.17 (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I provided edit summaries for my edits. 107.127.46.17 (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 107.127.46.17 (talk) 02:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@107.127.46.17: I restored your edits until you removed the citations because I didn't see a reason in the edit summary (I only saw re-tagged) why you removed them. Next time you remove sources, please explain in the edit summary: so there's no misunderstanding. But apologies on my part for reverting your other edits, as I didn't mean to do that. You're welcome. Khrincan (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You recently posted material into the article Percy Hynes White which reported serious allegations of criminal actions, based only on Twitter posts. That is totally unacceptable, and a violation of the policy on biographies of living persons. If you did so without checking what you were posting, then you should have checked. Don't make the surprisingly common mistake among fairly new editors of thinking that the fact that someone else had previously posted the same unacceptable material somehow means that you aren't responsible for posting the material: you are responsible for ensuring that editing you do is acceptable, no matter what someone else may have done. JBW (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: I’m sorry for putting material that violated WP:BLP policy. Before I reverted the removal, I didn’t check the source to see if it was reliable, which you pointed out is very unreliable, and I made a crucial mistake. I take full responsibility for my actions- but thank you for pointing it out. I will check next time to see if it violates WP:BLP when it happens again. Thank you again. Khrincan (talk) 23:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's an easy mistake to make, and re-reading my comment above I think I worded it in a harsher way than I could have done. My apologies for that. JBW (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: It’s okay, and I understand why you would use that wording to notify me about my mistake. Khrincan (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Khrincan. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing TwinkleorRedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Khrincan (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]