Hello Kofi Meija! Your additions to Adhikar (1939 film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! Thanks for pointing that out, and I appreciate your feedback. You're absolutely right, using "passed away" instead of "died" is considered a euphemism, and it's not in line with the Wikipedia style guidelines. My bad on that one, I'll make sure to keep it in mind for future reference. Cheers! Kofi Meija (talk) 13:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@Kofi Meija: How goes it? I noticed on the Brockman article that the "People from Thompson, Dakota" category doesn't exist. I guess it wasn't created at the time. Fancy having a go at creating it? scope_creepTalk14:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, Scope creep! It's going great, thanks for asking! 😄 Oh, I appreciate you pointing that out. You're right; it seems like it slipped through the cracks. I'd be thrilled to give it a shot. Kofi Meija (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
... for adding infoboxes for people where they are reported missing! I changed the one you added for Manfred Cordes, and just explain the edit summary:
For people in classical music and opera, {{infobox person}} has been found better suitable (than Musical artist which was designed for pop music). Project opera said so in its project guidelines, but its true for the other as well. Some editors in classical music oppose all infoboxes, and the plain look of "person" is more likely to not annoy them ;)
Thank you so much for your kind words and for your edit on the Manfred Cordes page! I really appreciate your attention to detail and your dedication to improving the quality of the articles.
I completely understand and agree with your point about using {{infobox person}} instead of the Musical artist template for individuals in classical music and opera. It's great that Project Opera's guidelines align with this, and you're absolutely right that the clean and straightforward look of "person" might resonate better with some of our fellow editors in the classical music realm.
I'm glad you mentioned the sub-templates like {{birth date and age}} and {{birth year and age}} – they're super handy for keeping information consistent and up to date. And you're spot on about parameters like "years active" and "organizations" – they provide valuable insights at a glance.
It's a pleasure to meet you too! Collaborators like you make Wikipedia an incredible place for sharing knowledge. If you have any more insights, suggestions, or just want to chat about editing, feel free to reach out anytime.
This too shall pass. - Ten years ago on 28 August, I heard a symphony, with a heavy heart because of the pending decision in WP:ARBINFOBOX, and not worried about my future here but Andy's. - It passed, and I could write the DYK about calling to dance, not battle, and Andy could write the DYK mentioning about peace and reconciliation, - look. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! I appreciate your feedback, and I'm always striving to improve my contributions. If you have any more suggestions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss, please feel free to reach out. Kofi Meija (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for adding an infobox to The Fog Horn. I've corrected it to "Infobox short story" from "Infobox book", but couldn't figure out what you meant by "preceded_by"/"succeeded_by": after all this story was not part of any series. I figured that was some sort of a thinko and left it out. If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate it if you corrected the article and told me that I'm wrong.
Hello, I appreciate your feedback and for making the right corrections. Your edit was spot on, my mind must have been somewhere else! Thanks for your diligence! Kofi Meija (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please have a look at WP:SHIPMOS and the instructions and layout for infoboxes. None of the ones you have recently added will display as you have not used the appropriate format. Before publishing an edit I suggest you use the preview button to ensure that what you have done has worked Lyndaship (talk) 16:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
When you add an infobox to a location article and copy the coordinates already in the article into the infobox, please remember to change |display=titleto|display=inline,titleand to delete the coordinates you copied. (An article can't have two {{coord}} templates with title display.) It wouldn't hurt to check the accuracy of the coordinates, too, but I guess everyone can't be expected to do everything. Deor (talk) 22:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain your reasoning for this edit? For example, what policy, guideline, or other standard says there is any problem at all with having a local image, or that no image at all is better than local image? DMacks (talk) 04:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Sorry for the confusion, I thought the local image was violating copyright policies, so it must be removed. But it seems that it may be used to illustrate the subject in question. Kofi Meija (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Informant (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julien Leclercq.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Municipality of Tomislavgrad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romans.