On1 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jetson One, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Forbes said of the Jetson One aircraft, "Flying Cars Are Here"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jetson One. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jetson One), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lightburst,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:2024 administrative elections proposal. I'd be honored if you gave your feedback :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't going to comment in this thread at all, but I have to note the futility of supposing that anything is going to be done here. I've certainly had my run-ins with members of the ARS (several of them, as I expected beforehand that they would, turned out to oppose in my RFA, with DF saying that "I don't really think this person is a good editor")Also the voter may wish to be an admin someday - and voting oppose may hurt them later. JPxG said something about it in their RFA.
I don't know if it is appropriate for me to do a full go-off about the RfA process while I am in the middle of one, but I suppose I will be honest: it's fucking sad. While nobody has individually chosen to play the part of the villain, the outcome is nonetheless disgraceful. The number, right now, is 222/1/1: but is that real? Who knows. Maybe there are some people who think I'm a complete piece of trash, and are simply choosing not to throw themselves upon the bonfire by saying so in public at a 222/1/1 RfA. I guess we'll never know: I have been given the gift of a potentially high ratio, at the price of a potentially dishonorable victory. But what else could have been done? What else were they supposed to do? The options seem to have been to do that, or to say nothing and let it stand.
Revolutionary War's most logistically challenging and dangerous clandestine operations.Was George Bush objectively evil when he started a war in Iraq which killed roughly 200,000 people based upon either lies or faulty intelligence. So "objective moral evil" is a misnomer and accusing another editor of supporting it, is wrongheaded and a possible aspersion. I imagine there are levels of evil but none of them are objective IMO. Remember the "Are you now or have you ever been..." from the McCarthy era. Lightburst (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Thanks for uploading File:The First Hellcat Ace Book Jacket by Hamilton McWhorter III.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
This award is given in recognition to Lightburst for collecting at least 25 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
This award is given to Lightburst for doing over 25 re-reviews, in the January 2024 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
On12 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article August Palmisano, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when tavern operator August Palmisano was killed in a 1978 car bombing, authorities suspected organized crime in Milwaukee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/August Palmisano. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, August Palmisano), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Lightburst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Okauchee Lake".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey.
Repeating what I said here, per the 2015 RfA reforms crats are empowered to make clerking actions, such as those done by AmandaNP a short while ago. Will you please self-revert this? Sideswipe9th (talk) 03:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
when the majority voters can cancel the votes of the minority votersThat's not what happened here though. Homeostasis07's vote was the equivalent of chucking a grenade and running for the hills. On any other area of the project, the extremely serious and wholly unsupported aspersions that they cast about another editor would have been challenged, and without a relatively swift response (ie, within 24 hours) been removed per multiple policies (WP:CIV, WP:NPA, WP:ASPERSIONS). You cannot say what Homeostasis07 said about another editor without proof. It is only because of a quirk of the RfA process, where we expect crats to take those actions, and how that expectation interacts with the expectation that the role of the crats is to not take controversial actions, that our normal procedures for dealing with this sort of issue don't happen. Basically no-one is either willing or feels able to enforce our normal conduct policies.
It is obvious that Homeostasis07 was still smarting over that incident.Sure, but that wasn't the thrust of their vote. The background interaction at TFA was there to set the tone and give a little background of what followed. The thrust of their oppose was because of off-wiki meatpuppetry allegations. That's a serious allegation to make against any user, let alone one that the community in general is not set up to handle. This is also one of those situations where, if the allegations hold out as true ArbCom would be extremely likely to desysop, if not indef. Had Homeostasis simply ended their vote with the TFA remark, I don't think everything else that's happened, including this discussion, would have happened. Hell, had they waited to oppose until after they had sent the evidence email to ArbCom and made a vote like
Oppose - poor off-wiki conduct, I've emailed evidence of this to ArbCom, there would have been a collective "huh?" but there wouldn't have been cause to strike or redact the vote.
Hello Lightburst, thank you for moving the Geno (Super Mario RPG) DYK nomination to the queue. It makes me quite happy to see it got approved so quickly. That being said, would it be ok to swap the one that's currently in the queue for Alt 1 of the nominations? Both hooks got approved and personally I think that one is more engaging. Sorry if this request seemed so late, couldn't really make up my mind till now. If it's not allowed to be changed, I will completely understand. All the best, CaptainGalaxy 22:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 06:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Message added 18:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beaver drop you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article Beaver drop you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beaver drop for comments about the article, and Talk:Beaver drop/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milwaukee Cold Storage Co. Building you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article Milwaukee Cold Storage Co. Building you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Milwaukee Cold Storage Co. Building for comments about the article, and Talk:Milwaukee Cold Storage Co. Building/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Lightburst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The 3:16 game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. I agree with you about the images. I've been trying to figure out how to best approach them. I plan on uploading two images in the next several days, but I'm running into roadblocks on the newer image. The colors are just completely wrong. I believe her student is wearing the crimson USC colors of the doctoral robe and Olga herself is wearing a marine blue dress, but the photo looks all wrong and this disturbs me. What's incredibly weird is that I have a memory (false perhaps) that when I was knee deep working on putting the article together last year, I ran across the same image, except it was color corrected. I can find no such image, but I will keep looking. It's possible it's out there or my mind just wants it to be real, I don't know. Viriditas (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park and Talk:International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 10:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park for comments about the article, and Talk:International Aviation Meet at Belmont Park/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 3:16 game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article 3:16 game you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:3:16 game and Talk:3:16 game/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 02:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3:16 game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.—Bagumba (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 3:16 game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 12:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
The article 3:16 game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:3:16 game for comments about the article, and Talk:3:16 game/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 19:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On31 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shank Hall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actor Corey Feldman knocked his own tooth out at Shank Hall? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shank Hall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shank Hall), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 14:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lightburst. Thanks for the tweak of the Johnny Buss hookinprep 5. I looked at more sources, and it seems its simplest for the hook to just conservatively state it's "one of the oldest comedy clubs". I've updated and sourced the article as such now. Can you update the prep? Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Lightburst,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On4 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Randy Travis, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that, after Randy Travis lost most of his singing ability to a stroke in 2013, James Dupré has sung his songs for him in concert? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Randy Travis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Randy Travis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On8 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 3:16 game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the 3:16 game, Tim Tebow threw for 316 yards with 31.6 yards per completion, the ratings for the game were 31.6, and the opposing team's time of possession was 31 minutes 6 seconds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The 3:16 game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 3:16 game), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WaggersTALK 12:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article August Palmisano you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 06:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article August Palmisano you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:August Palmisano and Talk:August Palmisano/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article August Palmisano you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:August Palmisano for comments about the article, and Talk:August Palmisano/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On9 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Butterfly Theater, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1911 the Butterfly Theater featured a pipe organ worth $10,000 (equivalent to $327,000 in 2023)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Butterfly Theater. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Butterfly Theater), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the headstone addition to Bud Lea. Are you local to Wisconsin? I recently visited from quite a distance with a plan to try to get photos of all of the historic sites in the Packers Heritage Trail but weather messed up my one day in Green Bay. See here for a longer comment. If you ever happen to be in the Green Bay area and are willing to grab some photos, I would be super appreciative. No worries either way, just bummed I couldn't get them! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | |
story · music · places |
---|
Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear (DYK) and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old (OTD). Thank you for seeing that the baritone's colleague is also notable. - Best wishes for your issues! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
This award is given in recognition to Lightburst for accumulating at least 25 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Hey Lightburst, I hope you're well. I just wanted to mention I felt your first of the two questions to be rather ambiguous. Is the intention for the candidate to speak about any of the related processes we have, or were you looking for an answer about specific areas? If it was intentionally open ended that's fine, I just wanted to make sure you intended it as such :) Hey man im josh (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Lightburst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Debra Pross".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Alan Kulwicki Memorial Park at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On22 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alan Kulwicki Memorial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alan Kulwicki Memorial Park was partially financed with a US$250,000 donation from Hooters chairman Robert Brooks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alan Kulwicki Memorial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alan Kulwicki Memorial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Dan Erlewine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RoySmith (talk) 18:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bent's Camp Resort until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Noah Robertson (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Robertson (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry some users insist on treating you as the community punching bag. I probably still wouldn’t agree with you if I was still active in XFD but I at least seek appropriate venues for such disputes instead of insulting people behind their backs. Dronebogus (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is notice about Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lightburst. I guess I'll just ask; why the votestacking? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per the result of this discussion, I've removed your autopatrolled flag. The WordsmithTalk to me 19:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]