Hello, Mabarlabin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoLeague of Mayapan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your editto10th century BC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your editto960s BC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm 220 of Borg. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tabasco (former state), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
You have created at least 1213 pages ALL with no references, at least one topic already had a Wikipedia page. It Is quite possible that all your pages could be deleted. You need to provide sources!. Please? 220 of Borg 06:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220 of Borg 06:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ajaw K'ak' Joplaj Chan K'awiil, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi.
Thanks for your recent addition. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability, requiring (as much as possible) that all material submitted to articles is verifiable. Could you provide references/citations for the addition you made?
If you are unsure about how to add references to articles, please leave a message at the article's talk page, providing links to the suitable references, requesting that the references be added to which part of the article, and add {{Help me}} to the message. Another editor will then be able to do the work for you (although we are all encouraged to be bold).
Thanks again for your contribution to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 
☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC) [reply]
Agree I agree with Loreindrew and have reverted your re-addition of a Wikipedia page as a source to Ajaw K'ak' Joplaj Chan K'awiil. This is in accordance with Wikipedia policies, such as Verifiability (WP:VERIFY) and Reliable sources (WP:RS) .--220 of Borg 03:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Ajaw K'ak' Joplaj Chan K'awiil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
* You have already been asked to give useable references, and I have already provided you with links to proper referencing help pages.
<ref name="Martin_g"> Martin & Grube 2000, pp.198–199. as per this edittoTzi-B'alamisnot a complete reference. What title is the book it is from? What is its' ISBN? Who published it? YOU need to provide this information.
I, and others, have spent quite a lot of time trying to communicate with you. Wikipedia is a group effort but if you cannot collaborate with others then it is possible Wikipedia is not the best place for you to edit.
It would be nice if you could at least acknowledge the comments of other editors, who are voluntarily trying to help you, by replying to them. --220 of Borg 05:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourcedororiginal content, as you did with this editto2nd century BC. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 06:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have created yet another un-sourced page (≈23 now) at Ah Xiu Xupan.
You have been advised of this before so let me make it clear:
This includes Spanish Wikipedia! You also, again, used refs of the " see e.g. Shelton, p. 109-110 " type. I also advised you (just above) that these are unnaceptable. WHO is 'Shelton'? Without any reference to a book or other source by Shelton these types of references are useless and the page is, in fact, un-sourced.
I have already gone through the pages you created and removed all references I found sourced to WP, and tagged the pages as un-sourced.
If you continue to create un-sourced pages I may have to open a discussion about your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents (WP:AN/I). All your pages may be proposed for deletion too. Please answer. --220 of Borg 01:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at History of sport. 
Reverted I have reverted your edit to this page here because it was unverifiable. You have been told why earlier. You must provide verifiable sources.
Time to start communicating, I would suggest. --220 of Borg 04:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
HiMabarlabin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. 220 of Borg 16:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toltec Empire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kabah, Huaxtec and Atlanteans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Khamar. Mabarlabin, thanks for creating Third Tikal-Calakmul War!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please rework the citations on your new article Third Tikal-Calakmul War. If you need help, please ask.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kyle(talk) 08:11, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Khamar. Mabarlabin, thanks for creating Second Tikal-Calakmul War!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to your article Second Tikal-Calakmul War
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kyle(talk) 08:20, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tikal-Calakmul Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacul. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maya Astronomy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.authenticmaya.com/maya_astronomy.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Maya Astronomy, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maya Astronomy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sagitarrius. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest structures built before the 20th century, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trujillo and Cholula. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K'inich Janaab' Pakal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
