Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Zilog Z280  
2 comments  




2 Question  
2 comments  













User talk:Mark viking




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









User page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


What do you think about this? Similar aritcle and my BEFORE is showing just mentions in passing? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't performed a BEFORE style search on other members of the Z80 family. There is some coverage, e.g. [1]. I consider author Al Williams (of Dr. Dobbs fame) as being a reliable source for this sort of topic. But it seems clear that a merge of verifiable bits and redirect could be a reasonable alternative to deletion for this processor as well. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 20:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Following some links I saw your comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 April 25#Category:Chapman & Hall books. As per you Springer and World Scientific are the best publishers for math and physics. As such I wonder f you know the same for biology and chemistry? Solomon7968 14:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For graduate and professional level biology books, I don't think there are any publishers that are as dominant and well thought of as Springer is for Mathematics. It seems a more heterogeneous publishing field. The university-associated publishers like OUP are still well-regarded in biology. For biology journal publishing, Nature, Science, and Cell Press are considered top tier. Medical publishing is a whole separate ecosystem with its own publishers. I don't know much about chemistry publishers. I know that The American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry are major publishers with top journals, but I don't know how well-regarded they are for their book publishing. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mark_viking&oldid=1220416958"





This page was last edited on 23 April 2024, at 17:17 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki