Contents

User talk:Narvekar ameya

HiNarvekar ameya! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Sam Ghosh, Narvekar ameya. Mumbaimover (talk) 06:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC) Mumbaimover[reply]

Thanks for reviewing The Heythrop Journal, Narvekar ameya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Article is wrongly formatted, contains no wikilinks, has no independent sources, etc...

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

Hello Narvekar ameya, thanks for reviewed 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin article. Have a nice day, Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just wanted to say "Thank you" for reviewing my article Lucky. I really appreciate it! Thank you!

TeamGale (talk) 16:39, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Narvekar ameya, regarding the reviewing the SSA Architects, it's good to some one admire the work done on the Wikipedia, well thanks for Honouring a Bran Star for me, if you need any further help regarding any matters on the Wikipedia you can freely leave a message on my Talk page. In further i am going to start work on a large and important page regarding Pune, and i would be Honoured if you also review that page if you would to like to review it. Again sincerely thanks for you contribution for reviewing the pages on the Wikipedia.

A barn star for you[edit]

	The Reviewer Barnstar
	For working hard to Review wew articles on the wikipedia. Akshay b patil (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but what review?Keith-264 (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing Malaysia at the 2013 Southeast Asian Games — иz нίpнόp ʜᴇʟᴘ! 07:00, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing newly created articles. It is a thankless chore that most editors avoid. I have one suggestion; try to provide more specific feedback for article creators. Simply saying "This page is reviewed" as you said here is not very helpful. Thanks again, Andrew³²⁷ 23:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to thank you for reviewing the new Pat Zalewski page.  :) Kheph777 (talk) 23:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the text has not been deleted but moved from the talk page to the project page. The talk page seems not to be the good place for such discussions. I guess you’d better revert your edit.

Thanks, (Ulissipus (talk) 23:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,

This message was not for you. Have a look at the article anyway!

Best, (Ulissipus (talk) 00:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the page I created about Scott Cawelti. In response to the "general notability concern," which I'm not sure was yours, I have made two additions. - 1) added information regarding a recent television episode drawing upon Cawelti's work - 2) replaced a website reference with a third party reference.

I hope these address the "general notability concern" and will allow that banner to be removed from the page. Please let me know if there are any further concerns.

Jim.oloughlin (talk) 19:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC) Jim[reply]

Hello, I see a message that you reviewed the new page I created: International Network Services Inc., however, I could not find any comment, contribution or feedback either here or on the talk page. Please feel free to contribute and/or provide feedback. I will revisit this page to expand, cross-link with other relevant pages in due course.
Enquire (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Narvekar ameya Thanks for reviewing my article; I just need your help from time to time to come over with exact article as per wiki guidelines.

Pancyadams (talk) 05:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC) Pancy[reply]

I have improved the article by adding category and internal links to wikipedia; please if possible remove tags of multiple issues and suggest what necessary we can do with the same.

--Pancyadams (talk) 06:21, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove full citations verifiable code issue from Himalayan University article as I have put Cite web ref link code to the same.

--Pancyadams (talk) 05:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Sawantvadi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. PhilKnight (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't wp:BITE, fellow is only 176 edits old, Ameya Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, don't copy paste, write in your own words. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Narvekar Ameya thanks for reviewing Himalayan University and I hope your same favor in future as well. --Pancyadams (talk) 05:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to User talk:Narvekar ameya has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 05:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Diannaa (talk) 05:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I added a comment to Camille Barbone's page about her contract work for Boundless Learning. I am the primary source- I've contracted for her services at Boundless Learning. Can you please add the edit back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.209.88 (talk) 19:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you made was reasonable, since my immature brother had made those changes. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.234.106.112 (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the page Narvekar. :D Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the International Crown topic. I am a novice here; having only started to edit or add information in Wikipedia since last year. Before that, I have fumbled my way, with some reservations, about how to edit or add information for a few years. Rockies77 (talk) 06:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for the hardwork at reviewing Sam Ghosh Mumbaimover (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my dear friend. Thanks for reviewing the page that I just created. I also thank you for Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help.--Alborzagros (talk) 07:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thank for the note!!!Iha9c (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 13:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked you must[edit]

Demonstrate that you can and will comply with our copyvio policy. Agreeing to have no involvement with the review process. You have been sending editors noticed that you have reviewed their articles when it is clear that either you didn't review them or that you don't understand what is required to say that an article has been reviewed. Dougweller (talk) 13:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, why was the comment removed it wasnt a spam or anything it was a related link which i need to get it done for an intern ship would appreciated if it would still be there. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psathaye (talk • contribs) 21:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]