Welcome!
Hello, Nirjhara, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as New indology, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on New indology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The amount of Eurocentrism in the field of Indology is overwhelming and far from any neutral status. 1.Most of the textual interpretations are the straw snogs of the centuries old hypotheticy and biased colonial view of India and Have no conclusiveness at all as we must note recent historic structure can never be put on archaic and totally unseen criteria. 2.No archaeologic evidence have ever been found 4 any aryan intrusion to the subcontinent, same goes to archaeogenetics 3.The racial interpretation of the word arya is a good joke. 4.If there is no clue of a theory then it should be treated as a theory and other theories should be having their space at a same level. 5.I challenge anyone to discard the conclusions.Nirjhara (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1. In theory: http://vishalagarwal.voiceofdharma.com/articles/indhistory/whatisamt/index.htm http://www.stephen-knapp.com/death_of_the_aryan_invasion_theory.htm http://gosai.com/writings/the-myth-of-the-aryan-invasion http://www.omilosmeleton.gr/en/indology_en.asp 2.In Genetics. http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v18/n9/full/ejhg201065a.html http://www.archaeologyonline.net/artifacts/genetics-aryan-debate.html http://www.pnas.org/content/103/4/843.full?sid=99aa9f1b-76b7-4e0e-9f36-b5400c4d3791 http://indianrealist.wordpress.com/2009/09/27/aryan-dravidian-racist-theory-trashed-again-by-genetic-evidence/ http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-09-25/india/28107253_1_incidence-of-genetic-diseases-indians-tribes 3.In Archaeology. http://www.archaeologyonline.net/artifacts/19th-century-paradigms.html http://koenraadelst.blogspot.com/2011/03/still-no-trace-of-aryan-invasion.html http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndiaArchaeology/message/12203Nirjhara (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not checking your sources, etc, but please don't use words like this, see WP:Words to watch. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 05:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Care to upload that paper you posted on my talk page? I would like to examine it further. From what I understand, the colonization of the Americas is still a pretty controversial subject and the Clovis First argument might not hold up to further scrutiny. Thanks.
--Bodhidharma7 (talk) 04:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC) there is no need 4 that, zhivotovsky, genealogical methods are variable and only direct evidence should be given priority like ancient dna or UEP.Nirjhara (talk) 07:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Understanding the genetic origins and demographic history of Indian population is important both for questions concerning the early settlement of Eurasia and more recent events including the appearance of Indo-Ayan languages and settled agriculture in the subcontinent.Although there is general agreement that Indian caste and tribal population share a common late pleistocene maternal ancestry in India,some studies of the Y-chromosome markers have suggested a recent substantial incursion from central or west Eurasia.To investigate the origin of paternal lineages of Indian populations,936 Y-chromosome representing 32 tribal and 45 caste groups from all four major linguistic groups of India,were analyzed for 38 single-neucleotide-polymorphic markers.Phylogeography of the major Y-chromosome haplogroups in India,genetic distance,and admixture analyses all indicate that the recent external contribution to Dravidian and Hindi-speaking caste groups has been low.The sharing of some Y-chromosomal haplogroups between Indian and Central Asian is most parsimoniously explained by a deep common ancestry between two regions with diffusion of some Indian specific lineages northwards.The y-cromosomal data consistently suggest a largely South Asian origin for Indian caste community and therefore argue against any major influx,from regions north and west of India,of people associated either with the development of agriculture or the spread of the Indo-Aryan language family"Nirjhara (talk) 08:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Listen buddy, even if its not europe, then aryans come from Afghanistan and central asia, thats where the consensus is going!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.178.179.154 (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Ok then prove it pal.Nirjhara (talk) 09:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
