Dont you think adding a gallery of photos of one grave is a little over the top?--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of HMS Stevenstone, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DE-Stevenstone.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, HMS Stevenstone, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DE-Stevenstone.htm. As a copyright violation, HMS Stevenstone appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. HMS Stevenstone has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:HMS Stevenstone.However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators willbeblocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article Hans Heinrich Wiegand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at David O'Keefe (author), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 02:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans Heinrich Wiegand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Heinrich Wiegand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dicklyon (talk) 02:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
