Contents

User talk:One

I was just thinking about you as a result of following some links from old AfD/VfD debates, and my goodness, you've edited as recently as two days ago.

Honestly didn't expect to see you back. Hope you're doing well. DS (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a wild six years. One two three... 21:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're still subject to WP:INACTIVITY, no? -- œ^™ 08:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was de-admin'd per WP:INACTIVITY some time ago. If my reading of the policy is correct, I have until mid-2017 to apply for reinstatement through the bureaucrats' noticeboard. I'm sure I'll be able to come to a decision before then on whether or not I'd like to take up mop and bucket duties once more. One two three... 09:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's hope that you do. Every just a little help is enough! -- œ^™ 02:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Playstation 9. Since you had some involvement with the Playstation 9 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 06:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bullenbeisser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Google™. Since you had some involvement with the Google™ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mousie Dung. Since you had some involvement with the Mousie Dung redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:34, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Binco. Since you had some involvement with the Binco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category navigation television stations established in year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 4#I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Milwaukeebears.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hurrican Rita. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 13#Hurrican Rita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome back to Wikipedia! I was going through some missing Wikipedians and saw you were listed. You have, however, edited within the last month. So, I will remove your name and welcome you back! Hope you’re here to stay! Happy editing, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kindal Moorehead has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Excutient (talk) 07:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Hurricane Gamme, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – 🌀HurricaneCovid🌀 _(contribs) 15:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Flag?.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. A proposed flag for a micronation of wikipedia editors which existed on IRC and a User subpage. WP:NOTWEBHOST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:KubuntuKonqueror.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Wikipedia screenshot from 2006.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Democratic fascism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 1 § Democratic fascism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Box 850 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19 § Box 850 until a consensus is reached. 2001:999:68C:AC40:8038:7BCB:6859:B02D (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]