Very disappointed to see this quote go. I understand that the article could do with some trimming, but this just seems to be a little gem in the interpretation of how significant Hines was. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Duke Ellington - Time Magazine cover - Aug 20, 1956.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Squandermania. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Squandermania. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
musical maintenance
Thank you for Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea, for gnomish work cleaning up articles related to music, mostly contemporary music, adding reviews, requesting citations, paraphrasing quotations, removing trivia, for service from May 2008, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1927 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Squandermania. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for a tremendous job on this article. Did you actually typeset all those musical examples? --Ravpapa (talk) 10:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate and thank you for your contributions, specifically your use of an obscure coding language that most musicians don't have the time or desire to learn, most Wikipedians don't have the time or desire to learn, and thus very few musicians on Wikipedia learned. I have been told by a few highly opinionated Wikipedians that LilyPond is preferred to images of musical notation and sound files of the depicted music, but I have not seen anyone take much, if any, of the time and effort that you have to try to replace useful images with useful LilyPond substitutes.
However, I am happy to ask that you please create complete substitutes for the things that you remove. It may make a few people quite happy that you do the work for them and replace an uploaded image of a musical chord with a generally quite similar LilyPond generated image, but for most people, such as people without musical training reading articles about music topics, the failure to replace the sound file with a generally quite similar LilyPond generated synthesis creates a large gap and leaves many readers without any real access to the information portrayed.
It is quite discouraging to users who cannot read music to read a description of a chord containing words with multiple meanings in multiple contexts (such as consonance, which may refer to agreement as opposed to disagreement, similarity as opposed to difference, matching as opposed to clashing clothing, to consonants as opposed to vowels, and more) but not be given the means to listen to what is described and evaluate the description using their perception of the object described (I can look at a picture of a chord and play it on my keyboard, if need be, but people, even musicians, who can't read music can not do that, so if the LilyPond image does not contain a means of playing a chord these users may never know what the chord sounds like).
For example, in the "Supertonic" article you replaced the images of scales with LilyPond code and replaced the MIDI files of those scales with LilyPond synthesis playing those scales followed by the supertonic chords, but you removed any ability for a reader who cannot read music to play the chords alone. This makes it much more difficult to compare one form of the supertonic with another form (such as the supertonic seventh chords with no sound file or LilyPond synthesis). If LilyPond is preferable because it is more accessible (it may be modified by people without the "privilege" of owning musical notation software), then it should be used to create the most accessible examples possible rather than as an excuse to remove information because it's not presented exactly the way that someone wants it to be.
I would also like to ask that you please reposition citations to the relevant text or LilyPond image that you substitute for image files, as verifiability is one Wikipedia's highest priorities and articles are weakened rather than strengthened when the material discussed is not supported by citations. Hyacinth (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Many thanks for the great work that you and Hyacinth etc have done on all the score examples! I noticed that on the Leading Tone article, in the section titled "Upper leading tone", there's an example on four staves in D minor. It seems to me that the score example has a trill from C# to D#. While enharmonically the D# is the same as E flat, it doesn't seem to me to be an example of an upper leading tone, which would have the main melodic line going from E flat to D. I suggest perhaps a different example might be better. – Fh1 (talk) 06:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abide with Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eventide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to John Adams (composer) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
How is the Sergei Prokofiev edit a "vandalism"? Can you give any explaination and back your claim with any evidence?
From Vandalism on Wikipedia: "On Wikipedia, vandalism is editing the project in an intentionally disruptive or malicious manner. Vandalism includes any addition, removal, or modification that is intentionally humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, or degrading in any way.". Is stating the linguistically correct fact an "intentionally humorous", "nonsensical" "a hoax" or "degrading"?
--Kasabian (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm a MediaWiki developer currently investigating a bug related to musical scores (don't worry, you didn't do anything wrong) and am curious how you make edits like this one. Do you create the score in the visual editor by transcribing the existing image? Or do you prepare it in an external editor and just paste it in the template?
Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 01:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prodigal Son (ballet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anton Dolin.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
