Contents

User talk:Walle83

Hi. Netherlands has shown interest in the Gripen NG. Maybe you could update the Gripen user map accordingly. Thanks. LarRan (talk) 14:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I noticed that you added the war in Georgia to the list of conflicts which the T-80 tank served in. I already removed this information from the article once, since I have seen no references supporting this statement. (I did this because I am trying to improve the quality of the article, and as you may know, any questionable fact in Wikipedia should have a verifiable reference supporting it.)

So I'm removing it again for now, but I'd like to restore it if you could supply a reference link to some reliable source. Thanks. —Michael Z. 2008-08-24 06:22 z

On 9 May 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Moscow Victory Day Parade, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Mjroots (talk) 08:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your ship drawings have been created using parts taken from Shipbucket.com. We have a very strict Fair Use Agreement (viewable here: http://www.shipbucket.com/fairuse.php). You are NOT the original author of these drawings and as admin of Shipbucket, I kindly request their replacement with a properly-credited drawing or their outright deletion. Colosseum (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can't use our parts without using our template. See the Fair Use Agreement for details. Thanks for your understanding. Colosseum (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lot of proportion ships viewed in Shipbucket and that used by Walle83 is different. I think this is created by Walle83. For example i can´t found any drawings of Ivan Gren on Shipbucket page...--Hornet24 (talk) 18:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Walle informed me that he used Shipbucket guns and a Mil helo on his image, therefore it MUST be credited properly and placed in the shipbucket template to be used. Colosseum (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, as long as the Shipbucket parts have been removed, there is no problem here. Colosseum (talk) 04:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Walle, can you build brawings of Buyan class corvette (i mean one for pr.21630 and second for 21631)? Some fotos and 3D design is in refs on page... THX :)--Hornet24 (talk) 18:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Walle83 (talk) 23:27, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some difference in launch procedure in Russia - in most shipyards is ships/subs build in constuction hall, then is moved on "rail" to launch position in floating or static dock in which is ship launched. Same type of procedure is used in case of overhaul, when ship/sub is overhauled in hall which is sometimes hundreds meters from water. --Hornet24 (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

The article Project 1157 cruiser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about a ship class of dubious existiance - only 'references' found in a quick Google are Internet forums (one of which says '...as the real Project 1157 was an intelligence gathering ship...') and Wikimirrors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Roine Carlsson. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walle83,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Ceannlann gorm (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hi,

I would appreciate it if you could give your input regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_naval_ship_classes_in_service#Split_this_article_into_multiple_articles Thanks in advance Dragnadh (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Ivan Gren-class landing ship does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - ^theWOLFchild 23:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lexi Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexi Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Harris Kent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Harris Kent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's good that you are adding sources to articles, but it would be even more helpful if you could add them as per WP:CITE. (See here for an example.) - wolf 19:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again[edit]

If you could fill the source you just added here, it would be helpful, as it won't create work for others. - wolf 02:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its Wikipedia, just edit if you want to add something Walle83 (talk) 12:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I realize that. But I'm not talking about adding content of my own, I'm talking about fixing your edits. You are leaving bare refs (like this), which means someone else has to fill them in (like this). They should be filled in, per WP:CITE, and are easy enough to do when you add them, but when you leave them bare, you just create work for others. - wolf 17:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I dont get why the English version dont have the auto-making ref option, would make things so much easier. I might try if I get inspired, but since Im been adding sources like I do since 2007 i doubt it. Walle83 (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, you're just creating work for others. It only takes a few extra seconds to complete the ref when you first add it, how much "inspiration" do you need, to do something so quick and easy? - wolf 22:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ship classes of the Swedish navy 1940 to present has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shang-class submarine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 08:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Type 052D destroyer, you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, citations need more than just the URL. Demonstrate you've accessed - or are capable of accessing - the quality of the source by adding additional information (WP:BAREURLS). - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 15:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Type 094 submarine! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 20:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]