Contents

User talk:WegianWarrior

WegianWarrior is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives
Archive 1	Archive 2
Archive 3	Archive 4
Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8
Archive 9	Archive A

22 July 2024
Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation Board resolution and vote on the proposed Movement Charter Essay: Reflections on editing and obsession In the media: What's on Putin's fork, the court's docket, and in Harrison's book? Obituary: JamesR Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword Humour: Joe Biden withdraws RfA, Donald Trump selects co-nom
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Please feel free to leave me a message, at the bottom of my talk page. I do however ignore unsigned, anonymous messages so please sign them if you want a response.
PS: Vandalism and other offensive commentary / trolling will go straight to the trash. If you want me to respond / take your comments seriously, sign them with ~~~~.

Hello again! I appreciate your prompt response and advise. I will definitely implement your suggestions. I assure you as well that there are no hard feelings whatsoever. I have no malice toward constructive criticism added with some advice... I am now aware of a better way of doing things due to this interaction, something for which I must thank you. Again, thank you for your time and assistance. -Raleigh, The Honourable, Th.D, OSF Thetruchairman (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Krag Jørgensen M1895 & M1906.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Norwegian soldiers armed with Jarmann (1893).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've just warned Boss Reality about 3RR, you are there also. Not worth getting blocked over this pathetic article. Dougweller (talk) 13:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krag Jørgensen M1895 & M1906.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to take a look at it with the socks struck, and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Electromechanic. Dougweller (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wegianwarrior. When I was reading the articles about the illuminati and new world order theories here I was checking if they are objective and take a neutral stance, but the problem is that I don't see the symbolism described which is often mentioned about the illuminati. I 'm currently creating a seperate article for it which starts to become long, but I want to know if it will be accepted, because I don't want hours spent on writing an article in which I objectively describe symbolism to be deleted while I spent a lot of work on it. How can I provide sources and where can I do this? Bokareis (talk) 21:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I agree with removing parts which are unrelevant in my article Illuminati symbolism, but I don't really see how the mentioning of Spongebob is unrelevant, I added this because in the article at Liberty Voice references were made to the Spongebob episode in an article writing about the conspiracy theory. People obviously interpret it as illuminati symbolism and therefore it might be worth mentioning. Also, tv.com mentions in their trivia that the episode is a parody of freemasonry, instead of "the work of some secret organization".

In the Spongebob episode "Cephalopod Lodge" references to freemasonry are made, the episode is a parody of freemasonry.^[1]

Bokareis (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with you. It is connected to the illuminati by fans, but you are right that this isn't stated in the trivia or any other reliable source like a newspaper, therefore if it's mentioned at wikipedia it might fit better in an article about freemasonry and examples of parodies of freemasonry. What do you think of merging my article with the Illuminati in pop culture article, the pop culture article is missing certain parts which are explained in my article, like fans of pop artists relating certain things to the illuminati and the criticism of the claims of illuminati symbolism, which I wrote about in 'criticism'. Though, there would be some modifications needed for a merge, the sub 'criticism' could be confusing in the pop culture article and should rather be 'criticism of illuminati symbolism'. The problem however is that some parts are not related to pop culture and more to the symbolism itself. Bokareis (talk) 18:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Mormonism does not really fit the definition of Christianity. Its more different from Christianity than Islam or Freemasonry for that matter are. Christianity is a monotheistic religion, Christians believe God has eternally been God, that God is the creator of all things, that he is not created, and that he is not of the same species as man. Islam believes that to. Those Masons who interpret Freemasonry as a religion usually also believe that. Mormons believe God was originally a man, that he lived on another planet, that he followed the precepts of his God, that his God elevated him to godhood, and that God is of the same species as man. They believe God begets spirit children through sex with his wives, and the spirit children are reincarnated on earth in human bodies. Mormons believe that there are an unlimited number of gods in the universe. I think include Mormonism in an article about Christian opposition to Freemasonry would be like including Islam in that article. Also Muslims and Mormons have a similar understanding of Jesus. They both consider him a prophet, not a god. So the fact the Mormons believe in Jesus is irrelevant, so do Muslims. --PaulBustion88 (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you on the square?

If you're on the square, fraternal greetings to you. If you're not on the square, fraternal greetings to you anyway.

If you want to let people know---I created two templates. You can advertise membership in the Swedish Rite with {{SMIB-se}}, and you can advertise membership in the broader fraternity with {{SMIB}}. --FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8 (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krag-Jørgensen-Speed Loader 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify which govt, so we know which exemptions if any to apply? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please advise on reason for reverting change to 'world government' page to include reference to "on the organisation of the species". Thanks AllChangeIsNoChange (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Kanonbåt Æger 1894.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WegianWarrior! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]