The vetulicolian body plan comprises two parts: a voluminous rostral (anterior) forebody, tipped with an anteriorly positioned mouth and lined with a lateral row of five round to oval-shaped openings on each side, which have been interpreted as gills (or at least orifices in the vicinity of the pharynx); and a caudal (posterior) section that primitively comprises seven body segments and functions as a tail. All vetulicolians lack preserved appendages of any kind, having no legs, feelers or even eye spots.[5] The area where the anterior and posterior parts join is constricted.[6]
Their taxonomic affinity has been uncertain; they have been considered to represent stem- and crown-grouparthropods, stem-group vertebrates,[7] and early deuterostomes (a group which as a whole includes the vertebrates, other invertebratechordates, echinoderms and hemichordates). The general scientific consensus before 2001 considered them early limbless arthropods but now considers them early deuterostomes.[8] Vetulicolian fossils examined in 2014 show the presence of notochord-like structures, and it was concluded that vetulicolians are crown-group chordates and probably related to modern tunicates.[9] Research from 2017 rather indicates vetulicolians are related to Saccorhytus, another basal deuterostome group,[10] although another study shows possibility that Saccorhytusisecdysozoan instead of deuterostome.[11]
The taxonomic placement of the vetulicolians remains controversial. The original researcher Shu is of the opinion that the vetulicolians probably represent an early type of deuterostomes, and that this implies that segmentation in cephalochordates and vertebrates may be derived from the common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes.[7] However, Derek BriggsofYale University and his team who described Skeemella from the Middle Cambrian of Utah regard it as having affinity to protostomes with important arthropod features, thus confounding assignment of Vetulicolia to Deuterostomia.[12] Thurston C. Lacalli of the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, agreed that the group are deuterostomes, but suggested that the animals were more likely related to tunicates.[13]
Dominguez and Jefferies have argued, based on morphological analysis, that Vetulicola (and by implication, other vetulicolians) is a urochordate, and probably a stem-group larvacean. Some question the relation to tunicates and larvaceans, as there is no evidence of segmentation in tunicates, larval or adult, that is comparable to segmentation in vetulicolians, that the anus of urochordates is within the atrium, while that of vetulicolians is positioned at the terminal end of the tail, and, perhaps most importantly, there is no exhalant siphon, or analogous structure, seen in vetulicolians.[14] However, a discovery of a new vetulicolian, Nesonektris aldridgei, from Australia in 2014 supported a position close to urochordates for vetulicolians.[9]
The monophyly of Deuterostomia is not strongly evidenced.[16][17] If deuterostomes are paraphyletic, pharyngeal slits were probably present in the common ancestor of Bilateria and vetulicolians may be stem-group protostomes that retained the ancestral pharyngeal slits.[17] If this is the case, banffids, which appear to lack pharyngeal slits, may be more closely related to crown-group protostomes than other vetulicolians.[17]
From their superficially tadpole-like forms, leaf or paddle-shaped tails, and various degrees of streamlining, it is assumed that all vetulicolians discovered to date were swimming animals that spent much, if not all, of their time living in water.[14] Some groups, like the genus Vetulicola, were more streamlined (complete with ventral keels) than other groups, such as the tadpole-like Didazoonidae.[14]
Because all vetulicolians had mouths which had no features for chewing or grasping, it is assumed that they were not predators.[14] Since vetulicolians possessed gill slits, many researchers regard these organisms as planktivores. The sediment infills in the guts of their fossils have caused some to suggest that they were deposit feeders. This idea has been contested, as deposit feeders tend to have straight guts, whereas the hindguts of vetulicolians were spiral-shaped. Some researchers propose that the vetulicolians were "selective deposit-feeders" which actively swam from one region of the seafloor to another, while supplementing their nutrition with filter-feeding.[14]
^The taxon name, Vetulocolia, is derived from the type genus, Vetulicola, which is a compound Latin word composed of vetuli "old" and cola "inhabitant".
^Dominguez, Patricio and Jeffries, Richard. (2003). Fossil evidence on the origin of appendicularians. Paper read at International Urochordate Meeting 2003. Abstract at [2] – URL retrieved June 22, 2006.
^ abcdefAldridge, Richard J.; Hou, Xian-guang; Siveter, David J.; Siveter, Derek J.; Sarah E., Gabbott (2007). "The systematics and phylogenetic relationships of vetulicolians". Palaeontology. 50: 131–168. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00606.x. S2CID85722738.
^ abcKapli, Paschalia; Natsidis, Paschalis; Leite, Daniel J.; Fursman, Maximilian; Jeffrie, Nadia; Rahman, Imran A.; Philippe, Hervé; Copley, Richard R.; Telford, Maximilian J. (2020-07-02). "Lack of support for Deuterostomia prompts reinterpretation of the first Bilateria". bioRxiv10.1101/2020.07.01.182915.
^Vinther, J.; Smith, M. P.; Harper, D. A. T. (2011). "Vetulicolians from the Lower Cambrian Sirius Passet Lagerstätte, North Greenland, and the polarity of morphological characters in basal deuterostomes". Palaeontology. 54 (3): 711–719. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01034.x. S2CID85602402.
