This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2015 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2015.
The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).
| “ | All sanctions and page restrictions must be logged by the administrator who applied the sanction or page restriction at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. Whenever a sanction or page restriction is appealed or modified, the administrator amending it must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry.
To be valid, sanctions must be clearly and unambiguously labelled as an arbitration enforcement action (such as with "arbitration enforcement", "arb enforcement", "AE" or "WP:AE" in the Wikipedia log entry or the edit summary). If a sanction has been logged as an arbitration enforcement action but has not been clearly labelled as an arbitration enforcement action any uninvolved administrator may amend the sanction (for example, a null edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the original administrator. Labelling a sanction which has been logged does not make the administrator who added the label the "enforcing administrator" unless there is confusion as to who intended the sanction be arbitration enforcement. A central log of all page restrictions and sanctions (including blocks, bans, page protections or other restrictions) placed as arbitration enforcement (including contentious topic restrictions) is to be maintained by the Committee and its clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. |
” |
| — Arbitration Committee Procedures on logging sanctions | ||
| Yearly Logs (Full Log) | |
|---|---|
| 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005 | |
Zad68 04:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]Zad68 21:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]Zad68 21:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]"I have to say that I would have imposed the same [TBan] on you for your edit-warring, if it hadn't been for the purely procedural reason that I can't find evidence you have been formally notified of the discretionary sanctions regime for WP:MOS ... Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)"
"It is clear that this topic ban did not have the support of the community"[7];
"retroactively unbanned"[8] as of when request was made. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 10:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Zad68 03:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Zad68 03:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]Zad68 21:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]Zad68 23:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]Zad68 14:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In May 2015 administrator Zad68 imposed extended confirmed protection of Talk:Gamergate controversy as a discretionary sanction in response to this AE request. The Arbitration Committee notes that Zad68 is currently inactive so the sanction cannot be modified without consensus or Committee action. Therefore the Committee lifts the discretionary sanction on Talk:Gamergate controversy (not the article) to allow the community to modify the protection level in accordance with the Wikipedia:Protection policy.
Zad68 01:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Facepalm — My bad; totally didn't realize and/or forgot these were all already under 1RR. For whatever reason I was thinking that only applied to the Syrian one. --slakr\ talk / 08:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
