The result was keep. There seems to be a consensus here to Keep this article despite the varying opinions on the quality of the sources used in the article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
A non notable businesswoman with the only claim for notability being a judge in Shark Tank India which is not enough to establish WP:GNG. The subject has no significant coverage and the article contains PR sources. Some sources are just routine announcement of her participation in Shark Tank while some other have only brief mention about her. Thesixserra (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
___________________________
Keep is my vote, as could be expected for I am the initiator of the article. I believe the article qualifies for WP:NBIO as the subject is:
On a personal note: I spent one day initiating the article and now again two hours for the rebuttal of this deletion request. I would like to leave it with this and subsequent casting of my vote, wherever required. If other editors arrive and there is consensus to delete - so be it. If there are founded concerns of WP:SOAP, I recommend WP:BOLD to improve the article. PR was certainly not my intention and should be removed, if present. However, as I am not aware, which specific statement is meant, I advise Thesixserra to edit the concerning sequence(s).TomeasyTC 11:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
___________________________
I will respond to all of your arguments individually.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vineeta Singh. I am not aware of the extent to which
visual identificationcan function as a
justifiable reference. My understanding is that way, and it's possible that you could improve upon it by adding something that would make it more meaningful. RPSkokie (talk) 07:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
not a reflection of my personal opinion, and the majority of the analysis (about the sources) are based on guidelines provided by Wikipedia. RPSkokie (talk) 03:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sources | Sources Type | Links | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Written by Staff Writer | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Two IIM-A grads shun Rs 1-cr offer | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | A brief mention. |
The IITM Nexus (1st ed.), Chennai, India | Book | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not Applicable | FAIL | The publisher; Notion Press is a self-publishing/vanity publishing company. |
Sugar Cosmetics | Company link | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not Applicable | FAIL | company weblink |
'As CEO, my job is to get out of their way' | Video News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
? | Possibly a brand profile, with no critical analysis. Founder, speaking for the company and herself. |
Sugar Cosmetics surpasses 2 million followers on Instagram | Blog | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not Applicable | FAIL | promotional blog talking about Instagram followers. |
Forbes India W-Power 2021: Role models who will inspire a generation | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | There is not a single mention of Vineeta Singh in text. "Editor's Note" including an image of the cover showing Singh" - unjustifiable |
India's Best B-Schools | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not Applicable | FAIL | There is not a single mention of Vineeta Singh in text. "Image of the cover showing Singh on the right side of the website" - unjustifiable |
Self Tweet: Grateful for 2022 🙏 Thanks @BWBusinessworld for this | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not Applicable | FAIL | SPS | |
Sugar cosmetics: Lips don't lie | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | It is a news article about the company, and it includes quotes from the founder(s). |
'Investors refused to fund Sugar until my husband joined it': Shark Tank India's Vineeta Singh | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | Quotes from the founder; Vineeta Singh; INTERVIEW. Interviewer: Startup founder of another company. Subject: Sugar company. Publication: Youtube YOUTUBE, Adapted by: Businessworld staff writer - a reasonably lengthy chain. |
Sugar Sugar, Ah! Money, Money | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | It is a news article about the company, and it includes quotes from the founder(s). |
What makes Sharks take the bait? Vineeta Singh, Namita Thapar share the idea USP that attracts | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | Quotes from the founder; Vineeta Singh; INTERVIEW |
<KBC: Here's how Vineeta Singh, Aman Gupta, Anupam Mittal pitched for themselves to grab the hotseat | News | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
FAIL | Vineeta Singh is the executive director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd? - There are significant concerns regarding the source's editorial reliability. |
Smile Foundation | Company | Link | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not Applicable | FAIL | NGO weblink. Unable to locate any significant references to Vineeta Singh. |
Entrepreneuer India 2019 Awards | Awards | Link | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | FAIL | Company's award, not a personal award. |
Forbes India 2019 Women Power | Awards | Link | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | ? | NAWARD; Awards as an afterthought would have made sense if there was substantial coverage of Vineeta Singh to begin with. |
India's Top Entrepreneurs: BW Disrupt 40 Under 40, 2022 | Awards | Link | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | ? | NAWARD; Awards as an afterthought would have made sense if there was substantial coverage of Vineeta Singh to begin with. |
there is a consensus that "contributor" pieces in the publication should be treated as self-published, similar to Forbes.com contributors. Editors did not provide much evidence of fabrication in their articles, but were concerned that its coverage tends toward churnalism and may include improperly disclosed paid pieces, so it should not be used to support notability. The 2018 Mid-Day source is 3 paragraphs, mostly based on her quotes, and reports she ran a marathon while pregnant, so this is not significant independent coverage. Beccaynr (talk) 04:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]