The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The category does not list reserve teams and such category litteraly makes no sense as Italy has only one reserve team (Juve U23). DrSalvus 18:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 19:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as proposed; the category should remain, but all except Juve U23 should be stripped out as they are not reserve teams - they are already all correctly in Category:Football academies in Italy. At the moment Juve is the only Italian reserve team, but in theory every top pro club could launch one. If anyone really objects to a one-member cat it could be moved up to Category:Reserve team football, but that already has a few one-member national subcats. 23:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: A category that seems to have no scope for expansion and includes only its own main article probably should not exist. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- These are not diplomatic missions, but rather groups of activists against the current Belorussian regime. Even if we had articles on the "embassies" in each country. I do not think we would need this. The one article is already in a diaspora category. Hence no need for a wider merge. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate category. I dont think there are any other early medieval biography categories. The 5 subcategories are already in Category:Women writers (medieval)Rathfelder (talk) 08:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I agree that there should be uniformity on these, and while I think some are negligible (Big 12 Conference/Big 12, for example), I think referring to the MEAC as the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference or the SWAC as the Southwestern Athletic Conference kinda flies in the face of WP:COMMONNAME. It also directly contradicts the precedent set when the Big Ten pages were moved Talk:Big Ten Men's Basketball Tournament a couple years ago. fuzzy510 (talk) 20:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. The COMMONNAME discussion should be a separate one, on the talk page of those parent articles. If consensus changes and the article names are moved, then I'm open to re-naming the standings templates as such. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Colonial Athletic Association men's basketball standings templates[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Change name of conference to match naming of templates category contains fuzzy510 (talk) 01:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nomination. Instead of renaming these categories, it should be the templates within this category that should be renamed to reflect the full conference name instead of abbreviations to bring them in line with analogous templates for other sports; see Big 12 Conference nomination above. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Change name of conference to match naming of templates category contains fuzzy510 (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nomination. Instead of renaming these categories, it should be the templates within this category that should be renamed to reflect the full conference name instead of abbreviations to bring them in line with analogous templates for other sports; see Big 12 Conference nomination above. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Change name of conference to match naming of templates category contains fuzzy510 (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nomination. Instead of renaming these categories, it should be the templates within this category that should be renamed to reflect the full conference name instead of abbreviations to bring them in line with analogous templates for other sports; see Big 12 Conference nomination above. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Change name of conference to match naming of templates category contains fuzzy510 (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nomination. Instead of renaming these categories, it should be the templates within this category that should be renamed to reflect the full conference name instead of abbreviations to bring them in line with analogous templates for other sports; see Big 12 Conference nomination above. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Since the category was first created, the naming conventions for these templates shifted to using the abbreviated name of the conference. The category should reflect this. fuzzy510 (talk) 00:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nomination. Instead of renaming these categories, it should be the templates within this category that should be renamed to reflect the full conference name instead of abbreviations to bring them in line with analogous templates for other sports; see Big 12 Conference nomination above. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Since the category was first created, the naming conventions for these templates shifted to using the abbreviated name of the conference. The category should reflect this. fuzzy510 (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nomination. Instead of renaming these categories, it should be the templates within this category that should be renamed to reflect the full conference name instead of abbreviations to bring them in line with analogous templates for other sports; see Big 12 Conference nomination above. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jweiss11. It's not the category that should be renamed, but the templates themselves. SportsGuy789 (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#People by populated place in Spain
