Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Bad Romance  



1.1  Comments from NØ  
















Wikipedia:Peer review/Bad Romance/archive4







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Wikipedia:Peer review

Previous peer review

I've worked on this article intermittently for quite some time now. Much of my contributions were a few months ago when I revamped some sections and added lots of academic sources. While I'm still not fully done yet as I intend to make some changes, I will be grateful for comments on how to improve it to the point it is FA-worthy. FrB.TG (talk) 20:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I have checked the whole article. Would you check Basshunter article in return? List of issues:

1. "best-of" lists. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
2. "In the US, the song peaked at number" - the full name of the United States should be introduced. Sometimes it looks like it's scary to use full UK and US names if they not appear anywhere in the article. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
3. "The song has been covered by several artists." - any examples? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
4. "These songs were about the various abstract "monsters"—metaphors for her paranoias—she faced during the tour." - it is known what happened there? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
5. They are quotes: "You know that I want you, And you know that I need you, I want your bad, your bad romance" and "I want your love, And I want your revenge, You and me could write a bad romance" - is that correct? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
6. "Gil Kaufman from MTV News compared the song's tempo to Gaga's number-one hit "Poker Face"" - link to "Poker Face" every new section? There is also other words which could be linked every section. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That would be WP:OL
7. "Gaga's persona transformation"? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
8. ... should be added after space? I think it should be without space like this... Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I usually see it after a space.
9. Is this possible to add any references to Synopsis section? 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
This generally does not need a source WP:FILMPLOT.
10. "He believed, for example, that the scenes with Gaga in the bathtub represented baptism and the women with martini were performing communion." - what is the martini? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
11. "hegemonic [hetro]sexuality" - hetro? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
12. "25 Best Songs of 2009" - are quotation marks needed? 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
13. "on the 482nd spot" - I don't think it's needed to mention such position. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
14. "The review aggregate website Acclaimed Music currently has it listed as the 9th best song of 2009 (...)" - "currently" Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
15. Note c "Attributed to multiple references" - just transform it into group of references in one reference with description on top of references templates? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
16. "essence of Gagaism" - what is the Gagaism? Is that possible to introduce it?
17. There should be table with awards and nominations and listings as well. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
18. "British TV show" - just use "television". Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think this distinction is necessary since there are other versions of the show.
19. "During the Enigma shows, Gaga performs it in a gold color latex outfit" - "performs"? It not ended? Same with the next part of the sentence. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
20. "When glee club New Directions member Rachel Berry discovers that rival glee club Vocal Adrenaline are planning to perform a Lady Gaga number at Regionals, the character Will (Matthew Morrison) sets the club a Gaga assignment. The girls and Kurt then create costumes inspired by Gaga and perform "Bad Romance". - sentences in current time? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
21. "and has received many positive criticisms" - not in reference number 156 also archived link of reference number 156 seems to not work. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
22. Add template Track listing. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
23. Reference number 170 is dead also it is auction by some random eBay user (?). It should be replaced with better reference like official shop. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
24. There is no any source for personnel in easy accessible digital versions of release such as Spotify? Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
25. "Weekly charts" table - 2009 and 2010 peaks should be divided same as 2017 is. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that is necessary since it was released pretty late in 2009, and the song's peak was somewhere between 2009 and 2010. For 2017, it makes sense since it and 2009 are several years apart.
26. Links to redirects. See Help:Link color. Eurohunter (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are previous peer reviews. Wikipedia:Peer review/Bad Romance/archive3, Wikipedia:Peer review/Bad Romance/archive2 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Bad Romance/archive1. I don't know if found issues were fixed. Eurohunter (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, Eurohunter. I will get to them soon, and I’ll review your PR too. FrB.TG (talk) 06:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from NØ[edit]

Will add some comments here soon. I would greatly appreciate if you could contribute a review to my current FAC, if possible.--NØ 07:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ping FrB.TG--NØ 03:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have this page on my watchlist so don’t worry about it. I look forward to your review and will look at your FAC soon. FrB.TG (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it. Adding some comments now!
Full-throated linked to a Wiktionary entry.
These are my comments for the peer review. I hope this helps!--NØ 11:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, MaranoFan. I have addressed most of these and will get to the rest very soon. As for the sources, I have removed quite a few unreliable ones and will go through them thoroughly before nominating it. FrB.TG (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for your comments. After a good amount of work on sources and prose, I feel ready to try it at FAC now.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Bad_Romance/archive4&oldid=1101360738"

Category: 
June 2022 peer reviews
 



This page was last edited on 30 July 2022, at 16:25 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki