The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The only Margaret mentioned at the target is Alice Margaret Allen, which is unlikely to be the same person referred to by the redirect. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Internal search results would suggest that Phenylurea may be an independently notable topic, and at any rate is mentioned in half a dozen different articles. I would suggest deletion in order to encourage article creation, although disambiguation could also be a workable solution. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a good catch Rosguill and definitely one to be addressed. Phenylurea on its own usually refers to n-phenylurea/1-phenylurea/phenyl carbamide (see here for example) which should have its own article. Eolaíocht (talk) 10:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't appear to actually be an alternative name for the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This appears to be a made-up abbreviation without any common usage. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 04:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Be Home" is a partial title match for a number of works, but as far as I can tell, isn't the name of any article. Delete. - Eureka Lott 16:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The redirect is an ambiguous partial title match. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 04:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an artefact of a typo in am article now long deleted [1]); redirects with typos in the disambiguator are not a good idea. – Uanfala (talk) 15:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Most likely a misspelling of "expendable launch vehicle", which is already a redirect. There is no mention of an "expandable launch vehicle" in the article or online. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 29#Return of the
