The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 22:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Search doesn't handle this brilliantly, but that's at least in part due to us not having generic articles about the role of women in any orthodox religion - the closest match I can find is Category:Orthodox Judaism and women which while arguably a slightly better fit than the current target does not resolve the main issue. Thryduulf (talk) 10:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: nonsensical title. Veverve (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Redirect from a page move stating that "This is a TV series, not a film". A search on Google seems to confirm that it is a TV series. Deauthorized. (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as incorrect and unhelpful. J947 † edits 02:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 22:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 22:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nonstandard spelling of "forever"; not a useful redirect. The draft has no history besides redirection, so it's unclear why it was created in the first place. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I assume this was an attempt at creating a redirect via draft as opposed to WP:AFC/R. Regardless, if this were a mainspace draft I would support deletion of it. While Wakanda Forever is a phrase associated with the film, this spelling of it is not particularly commonly used in relation to the film. TartarTorte 20:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unclear connection to target. Has a resemblance to the root words, djous patēr, but no indication those were ever transliterated in this way. (NPP action)Edward-Woodrow • talk 18:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Remove: we do redirect common misspellings of an article's name, and so should redirect obvious or common misspellings of redirect titles (here, Deus Pater?), but we equally don't redirect every such misspelling. I can't see a compelling case to retain this one: I wonder if there's any way to pull data to see how often, if at all, the redirect has been called upon. Struck: I'm persuaded by the points made below, and my archaic Latin is clearly not up to snuff. UndercoverClassicistT·C 18:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
...yes, precisely like that. Thank you and apologies! UndercoverClassicistT·C 20:49, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep + Clarification: "Diespiter" is Archaic latin for "Jupiter".[1] It was the correct spelling of "Jupiter" in Archaic Latin, also known as Old Latin. Spaces were not regular or canonical in Latin before the 7th centyre, so "Dies piter" and "Diespiter" are equivalent and should go to the same article. E.g., it would have been spelled "ARMAVIRUMQUECANO", not "Arma virumque cano", but we are happy to add spaces where logical: "Senatus populusque romanus", not "Senatuspopulusqueromanus".
"Dies" = day
"Piter" = father
"Dies piter" was the day father god, but it got shortened over time to "Diespiter" => "Iupiter" ("Jupiter")
Spaces weren't introduced in Latin until the 7th century, well after "Jupiter" and "Diespiter".[2]DenverCoder9 (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Brittanica chooses to spell as "Dies-piter" with a hyphen, but the fact is that all spellings are valid, "Dies-piter", "Dies piter", "Diespiter", since Old Latin did not have a fixed notion of separate vs. combined words.[3]
Note that we redirect『Dyaus-Pitṛ』and "Dyaus Pitṛ", but don't redirect "Dyauspitṛ". On the article itself, it's spelled "Dyauspitṛ", so we should probably change this. DenverCoder9 (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC) DenverCoder9 (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obvious variation of an Archaic Latin name. I would have expected "Dies Pater", which in fact exists as a redirect to the article. "Diespiter" is mentioned in the lead; perhaps the article could use a section or subsection on the origin of the name with all of the common orthographic variants (probably treating the name as two parts, and indicating that it can be spelled with or without a space, to reduce the number of combinations that need to be given)—nearly all of them reconstructed, but used in modern literature about Roman/Indo-European mythology. Otherwise we may give the impression that there's only one correct way to spell it. P Aculeius (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
this (like 3CY) is the rendering in Latin script of the cyrillic 'ЗСУ' the native acronym for 'Armed Forces of Ukraine'—blindlynx 18:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: It seems to be rather non-ambiguous. The only uses other than as an attempt at writing the Cyrllic characters in English, are as some products SKUs, but it seems like a vast majority of the use is people trying to figure out what 3CY means in relation to Ukraine. While the lower case version is less likely to search, but still plausible enough that it seems worth keeping. TartarTorte 18:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TartarTorte. Thryduulf (talk) 10:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete the target has nothing to do with the general topic. This is not a Wikipedia-only topic -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 03:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
there seems quite a few non-mediawiki/non-wiki interface admins who manage user interfaces and web interfaces, etc. and also interface managers [1] -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom., the mainspace and the rest of WP should be kept separated. Veverve (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Move the target to this title. Surprisingly, the target looks like a real article, not a project page, so it should belong in articlespace. It can be AfD'd if need be. Duckmather (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, this was created in articlespace and moved to its current location back in 2007Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 07:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Return Wikipedia:Wikirage to mainspace at Wikirage, then retarget there – if someone wants to AFD it, sure, and it may just get sent back to project-space, but I don't see any reason the unilateral move was beneficial (and there was no reason given for it). It has referencing; it should go through AFD if we want it out of mainspace, not be sent to the backend where nobody will see it and it's less likely to be contested. Skarmory(talk •contribs) 20:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary cross-namespace redirects. If the language articles in question are "retired" (apparently amounting to a deletion that should have used AfD but didn't), then they should not have pointers from mainspace. * Pppery *it has begun... 15:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also: these deprecated articles were well-intended, but essentially OR-based interpretations of an extent classification proposal. These spurious concepts haven't produced citogenesis (with one shameful exception by a colleague in the field), so they are improbable search topics anyway. –Austronesier (talk) 15:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Redirect GA, delete others. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the NT one - is historical record - no longer current, not needed... JarrahTree 00:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
RetargetGA CuptoGeneration Adidas Cup (one of the references uses this abbreviation); as the current target is not content for the readership, it should target encyclopedic content, not maintenance content. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect Tokelau pages, delete Norfolk Island pages. Complex/Rational 22:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These should point to mainspace content, not a defunct internal list. * Pppery *it has begun... 15:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget the Tokelau pages to Tokelau#Sport, which briefly mentions football. I'm not seeing a good target for the Norfolk Island redirects, so delete those unless someone identifies a place to point them. - Eureka Lott 20:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget Tokelau ones to Tokelau#Sport and delete Norfolk Island ones per EurekaLott. A7V2 (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget the Tokelau ones to Tokelau#Sport and delete the Norfolk Island ones per EurekaLott. Can't find a good target for the latter either. J947 † edits 02:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 as the author (Bracy0008) has !voted delete and there are no contrary recommendations. Thryduulf (talk) 10:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too focused on Wikipedia, since this is just wordprocessing -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Defunct internal stuff does not warrant cross-namespace redirects. * Pppery *it has begun... 15:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it should be WP:Wikipedia-L and not in articlespace, non-readership content -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it should be WP:Intlwiki-L and not in articlespace, non-readership content -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete while I could see redirecting a hoax title to an article space section discussing the hoax, the fact that this still only lives in Wikipedia... well. Someone who cares enough to research this will still find it. Skynxnex (talk) 12:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it should be WP:GA criteria and not in articlespace, content for the editorship and not the readership -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure database report does not warrant a cross-namespace redirect. * Pppery *it has begun... 15:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unneeded WP:XNR. Would be unlikely to need to be found by those who do not know of project space. TartarTorte 18:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it should be WP:Long stubs and not in articlespace, as it is content for the editorship and not the readership -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Defunct internal processes do not warrant cross-namespace redirects. * Pppery *it has begun... 15:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia isn't the only place you can request feedback -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is not a Wikipedia-only topic -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary cross-namespace redirects, these user rights require sufficient experience that people qualified for them know not to search in mainspace. * Pppery *it has begun... 15:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not exclusive to Wikipedia -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple non-neutral redirects. With the exception of Kosovo, neither are currently border disputes. None seem plausible or discuss the territory being "occupied", other than by third parties. Similar to the currently-ongoing discussions of NATO Occupied Soviet Union and NATO Occupied Serbia. Randi🦋TalkContribs 08:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. These are contentious and may be better discussed separately, but I'm working only on the basis that the word occupied (without quotes) does not occur in any of the target articles. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
2023 United States federal government shitdown[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --Tavix(talk) 16:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The government is scheduled to stay open until at least November 17th. Cwater1 (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly not meeting WP:NPOV. Spurious idea that it is a plausible misspelling opens the floodgates to hundreds of other misspellings which the Wikipedia search software happily works out correctly in the suggestions it offers readers, without such redirects. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Shhhnotsoloud, and Mike Turnbull. "Shitdown" is a bit too unfortunate of a misspelling for me to forgive and could be seen as failing WP:NPOV. 〜Askarion✉ 23:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the one the one that is misspelled and keep the one that is spelled correctly just in case. - Cwater1 (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Somewhat to my shock this isn't speediable as a leftover from a move to the correct namespace, but instead was a deliberate creation so needs to go here. Anyway, this sort of deep internal category does not deserve a cross-namespace redirect. * Pppery *it has begun... 05:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 07:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should not be in mainspace.Naraht (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems to be a shipyard/ factory per nl.wiki's entry. Might be better off as a red link for now. --Lenticel(talk) 05:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a borked stub. I assume the person tried to create a substub and put it into this category -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as borked stub article. I assume the person was trying to categorize a substub into a category -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find a good target here in en.wiki. It also seems to pertain to a lot of things according to my Google search --Lenticel(talk) 05:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redirect into templatespace for a maintenance template, so not any sort of encyclopedic information -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 11:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nonstandard redirect format, this template does not warrant a redirect from mainspace. * Pppery *it has begun... 05:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unlikely redirect at best --Lenticel(talk) 05:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redirect into templatespace for a placefilling template which when contextless is nonencyclopedic, so completely useless to the readership -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 12:00, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete: I created this redirect as a mistake. Buaidh talke-mail 13:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mainspace -> template cross-namespace redirects can sometimes make sense if they are reader-facing templates or exceptionally common ones like Cite journal. This is none of those. * Pppery *it has begun... 05:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Meta-Templates are deep internal jargon that does not deserve a cross-namespace redirect from mainspace. * Pppery *it has begun... 05:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete seems more likely to refer to a computer science doctorate -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 12:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~ created when I was a wee fledgling novice wikipedian. ~Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone who knows to use the term "namespace", well, knows about Wikipedia's namespace system and thus that internal documentation won't be found in mainspace. * Pppery *it has begun... 04:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redirect into the pipework that is not content for the readership -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
End times (Fundamentalist U.S. Christian views).[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is (1) an unlikely target, which (2) has no links to it, and (3) links to a disambiguation page with no appropriate target for this redirect. Dan Bloch (talk) 03:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to malformed modifier (extra "." at the end). --Lenticel(talk) 03:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. ...and contains a capitalisation error and unnecessary full stop. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Implausible typo, was only at this title for less than a day. CLYDETALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 00:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete page move resultant recently created typo redirect from page creation error. Though this form of typo (leaving off the final character) is highly likely and common. (thus if it were an old redirect, it would be a weak keep) -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 12:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 9#Mob vote
