The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unlikely search term. Could refer to lots of frozen bodies of water, and not mentioned at the target article. It may have been mentioned at a point when Wikipedia was more lax with its standards, but it would not fit with Wikipedia standards today. Jontesta (talk) 22:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree about moving it, but only if there's something it actually needed to be disambiguated against. I don't see any other uses of the term on a Google search. BOZ (talk) 11:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoristalk! 22:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unlikely search term. Not mentioned at the target article. It may have been mentioned at a point when Wikipedia was more lax with its standards, but it would not fit with Wikipedia standards today. Jontesta (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I don’t have time to look into this deeply right now, but this edit summary suggests that this might be an {{R from merge}}, in which case its history might need to be preserved for attribution. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 07:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RetargettoJames Patterson (disambiguation). Seems implausible that none of those people have ever been referred to as "Jimmy" and the current target is mentioned there. (Maybe not the ideal link since the article doesn't mention the name but multiple other Medal of Honor articles do so it probably deserves to be there in some manner per WP:DABMENTION). Skynxnex (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per the talk page, the former article at this title was merged into three different articles. Deletion isn't an option, because we need to maintain proper attribution. While the character isn't mentioned at the current target, it appears to be the most sensible target among the various game articles. None of the other articles listed at James Patterson (disambiguation) mention that their subjects were called Jimmy. - Eureka Lott 20:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Response you're referring to outdated information from 2009. There is no more merge and there is nothing left to attribute. As I said in my nomination, it is from a time when Wikipedia standards were more lax. It should not and is not coming back, and thus a redirect is not suitable. Jontesta (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoristalk! 22:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Redirects to disambiguation page, the entry was without a wikilink. The game and developer No Fun Games are both non-notable, unlikely to be turned into articles. Mika1h (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there's no video game listed at the disambig page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Female Rage: The Musical" does not exist, this page was simply created in response to a trademark filing by Taylor Swift's team. Theknine2 (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because there is zero mention of it in the article. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 03:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's like redirecting "this sick beat" to Shake It Off because her team trademarked it. Ippantekina (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargettoDoug Ross. Jay 💬 06:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#Harley Quinn (pornographic actor)
