The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Propose mergingTemplate:Archive with Template:Automatic archive navigator.
Update: Propose deletingTemplate:Archive navigation. Template:Automatic archive navigator (more often done as {{talkarchivenav}}) looks the same as Template:Archive (usually {{talkarchive}} except it much more functionally provides automatic navigation between sequential archive pages. These should have merged long ago. All that is needed is porting the old template's |diff= and |histOffset= parameters to the newer template, if those parameters are actually useful, which is dubious to begin with; they're almost never used. If they're retained, |histoffset= should be aliased to the latter, because we don't traditionally use Python-style mixedCase parameter names and no one expects or is going to remember this one. PS: Or merge them the other way around and have the shorter name be the main name; I really don't care either way, as long as a zillion instances of what are presently {{talkarchive}} get upgraded to {{talkarchivenav}} functionality without having to tediously change all the archive pages to use the better template. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 12:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I haven't looked over the template code but I agree that there should be one template instead of 3 doing similar things. So support this. That said (and based on the disscussion from 3 years ago), this might be a bit more complicated than the regular code merge. Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Having one template for this purpose would be a significant improvement which I've been interested in working on in the past. The mentioned previous TfD put an end to that. I do however think that you underestimate the complexity of this merger. We don't want duplicate navigation lists which going from {{archive}}to{{aan}} can produce if you're not careful. There are also a bunch of pages where multiple {{Archive}} templates are placed throughout the page for some reason that probably should be removed. Then we have {{Archive navigation}} without an associated box and these templates being specified for use in archive bot instructions. And that's not mentioning pure misuse which I've seen a lot of with archive templates in particular. Things like putting boxes in boxes or putting an archive template on the main user talk page. All this can be done properly though and I would be happy to help with it. --Trialpears (talk) 22:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
This navbox functions purely as a list of organisations which are part of "UCLPartners", and is too large and unweidly to provide meaningful links / categorisation. Information is better provided in list or category format. Elshad (talk) 12:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
There's a reasonable semantic difference between these, though. {{Disputed}} is for falsehoods; {{misleading}} also covers cases where an article might be factually accurate, but presents facts in a way which results in the reader receiving a false impression. It might be that these use cases overlap sufficiently that {{disputed}} could be reworded to cover both, but right now it doesn't. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
