IMPORTANT NOTE: DO NOT ASK QUESTIONS HERE, unless they are about the help desk itself. Go to the help desk to ask questions about how to use Wikipedia.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Help desk page.
This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help MenuorHelp Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp articles
I am writing to seek urgent assistance regarding an ongoing issue with an article on Wikipedia. The article titled "Ayaz Sheikh" is currently under discussion for deletion, and I'm deeply concerned about its potential removal.I firmly believe that the article provides valuable information about a notable Pakistani singer and musician. However, there seems to be some misunderstanding leading to the deletion discussion.I kindly request your support in ensuring that the article is not deleted and that any necessary changes are made to maintain its integrity and compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines. I am open to making necessary revisions to address any concerns raised during the discussion.Your prompt attention and assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
@Syed Shaveer: As the notice at the top of this page states, this is the wrong place to ask. Please discuss on the relevant AfD page, and admins don't hold more power over any other editor when it comes to deciding whether an article should be deleted or not. Kindly refrain from canvassing. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, thanks for the clarification. I'll make sure to discuss it on the AfD page as advised. Appreciate your prompt response and guidance. Will refrain from canvassing further. Thanks again. Syed Shaveer (talk) 06:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect that there are many, like me, who only occasionally edit a Wiki page and are not well versed in the Wiki editing conventions. In particular, I just made a minor edit to a page and went to identify my authorship. I did remember that there was a simple convention for this but did not remember the format. Nowhere on the page was there any help or hint. Searching the help desk was frustratingly unsuccessful. After a long and tedious search I finally found the "~ ~ ~ ~" code but this experience was a demotivator for contributing. These should be a link to a quicky help page on every edit page (as I think there used to be), with short descriptions/examples of common edit conventions. ArtKocsis (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know it is not the help desk. My post is really feedback to the webmaster(s) but there is no link for feedback. The help desk page is for questions. My post was not a question and this is the closest category that I could find for feedback.
At this point I am giving up. I have just spent over four hours on what should have been a quick simple edit and tried to follow the preferred convention of signing an edit. Instead I have run into dead end after dead end and now complaints. So do with it what you will. I quit.
@ArtKocsis: While still active, ~~~~ is a lot less frequently used nowadays due to the Reply tool. If you're using the source editor and have enabled the 2010 editing toolbar or the 2017 wikitext editor in your preferences, the editor has a button you can press (using the 2010 editing toolbar) or an item in the dropdown menu under the + icon.
There's no need to sign inside edit summaries as the amount of wiki markup they can parse is limited, and the account making the edit is noted in the page's history. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
boilerplate/template for "I got scammed" threads?[edit]
Seems like these are a fairly regular occurence here, people come here for help when it turns out they've been paying scammers for an article that is never going to materialize. Wondering if anyone else thinks it is worth coming up with a stock reponse to such threads, with links to relvant resources? Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today19:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most editors who help at this desk do provide a link to WP:SCAM. My view is that we should try show empathy for those who may have been scammed, so a personalised message is better than a stock response. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jax 0677 This page is for discussion related to the Help Desk, and is not the Help Desk itself. Please post to the main Help Desk page. Requests to look at the requests for closure aren't likely to help significantly; all work here is done by volunteers. 331dot (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
button you can press (using the 2010 editing toolbar) or an item in the dropdown menu under the 
There is currently a discussion at WT:Drafts regarding a proposed split of WP:Drafts. The thread is WT:Drafts#Split into help page and guideline. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
