The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Leedsproject2019 (talk·contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) Insert relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.)
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds articles
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Leeds is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
No one is using this project so I am currently putting some of the main Leeds pages under it (with the intention to do all soon). I did not know about it myself until I thought of looking after finding there was a Bradford one. If you would like to help feel free, I am only the second person to join. Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This project is largely inactive, particularly while the Leeds page is still under debate. I am adding pages to it in the mean time. Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge inactive WikiProject as a taskforce of WP:UK[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. -- tariqabjotu 02:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Um, project Yorkshire will be better, and consistent with what you are trying to achieve with Project Bradford. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 04:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Examples of merged wikiproject banners abound, such as for {{WPAUSTRALIA}}, {{WPUSA}}, {{WPCANADA}} which feature taskforces, workgroups and subprojects on the same banner, with city projects listed as subelements of the national project. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll post that suggestion to WPBRADFORD. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If a WikiProject goes inactive, the best merge is to the smallest active enclosing WikiProject - and WP:YORKS is very much active. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would favour a merge into Wikiproject Yorkshire; that seems like the neatest approach, and I don't doubt a few people on that project will happily take Leeds articles under their wing if they haven't already. If WikiProject Bradford is also inactive, maybe that too could merge into WP:YORKS... bobrayner (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to WikiProject Yorkshire. It would seem very odd for it not to be there - that is where I would expect to find it. If things change, and WikiProject Yorkshire becomes unmanageable, then a spin-off into another division - say west Yorkshire - might be appropriate but that can be addressed if the time comes. --AJHingston (talk) 14:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment rather pointless to actually merge into Wikiproject Yorkshire as it already covers all of the articles covered by this project. Actually as I maintain Wikiproject Yorkshire to have sub-project would make it far less manageable. Leave it as it is without sub-projects. Keith D (talk)
That would be the reason to merge it into WP:YORKSHIRE, because it already covers all of the articles. Otherwise, we'd merge it to WP:UK (orWP:ENGLAND) as a task force. -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 05:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As I said I maintain WP:YORKS and would not wish to have task forces to make maintenance more difficult. Keith D (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How does this make maintenance more difficult? Nothing changes to the WPYORKSHIRE maintenance. -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 06:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Wiki Meetup has been scheduled for 5 October in the New Conservatory, Leeds, where you'll be able to meet other like-minded folk and talk about Wikipedia, Leeds, Yorkshire, and anything else that takes your fancy. Hope to see you there! To sign up, and for further information, see here. Cheers, Bazonka (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Arequested move discussion has been initiated for First Direct Arena to be moved to Leeds Arena. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Arequested move discussion has been initiated for First Direct Arena to be moved to Leeds Arena. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
