Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Studies  





2 Statistics  





3 Strategies  





4 Notable women in economics  





5 References  














Women in economics






فارسی
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Women are under-represented in the economics profession worldwide. This has wide social and material implications, as economists work in banks and government, and have a direct role in policy making. Studies have shown that decisions made and executed by diverse teams delivered 60% better results.[1] While many other fields, including STEM fields, have seen growth in the share of professors and students who are women, economics has stagnated with little improvement at any level in the last 15 years.[according to whom?]

Studies

[edit]

In 2015 Harvard researcher Heather Sarsons published a paper on whether co-authored papers and the gender of the authors might affect tenure. The paper found that there was an 8% increase in the probability of a male economist getting a tenured post with a co-authored paper on their resume, but only 2% for female economists.[2]

In 2017 Alice Wu, an undergraduate at University of California, Berkeley, published a study[3] which used natural language processingon economics job market rumors, an online forum used by academic economists to discuss job openings and candidates. The study showed that when posters on the site discussed female economists they tended to discuss the women's appearance, whereas when discussing male economists they tended to use terms emphasizing their intellectual abilities. She found two main results: first, nine of the top 10 words predictive of a post about a woman are explicitly sexual references, and, second, posts about women contain 43% fewer academic or professional terms and 192% more terms related to personal information or physical attributes.[4]

Most recently, in 2021, the evidence comes from a research study with a systematic attempt at quantitatively measuring the seminar culture within economics. They find that during a seminar, women presenters are asked more questions and the questions asked are more likely to be patronizing or hostile.[5] This paper is the latest addition to a mounting body of evidence of gender discrimination in economics.

Similarly, in academia, where "publish or perish" is still the dominant credo, women are treated more harshly. For example, in an analysis of publications,[6] it has been shown that men are tenured at roughly the same rate regardless of whether they co-author or solo-author. Women, however, become less likely to receive tenure the more they co-author. The result is most pronounced for women co-authoring with men, and less pronounced among women who co-author with other women.

In addition, female-authored papers took six months longer to get published, even though they are more readable than those produced by their male counterparts. This amounts to a significant time tax for female authors, and these higher standards impose a "quantity versus quality trade-off" that affects female academics' careers.[7]

According to The American Economic Association, compared with men, women disproportionately fall off the academic ladder at the time of promotion to tenured associate – a phenomenon that appears to be unique in the economics profession.[8]

Probably due to all of these reasons the research also shows that there is a confidence gap between men and women economists working in top U.S. universities. They find that women are still less confident than men; that women are less likely to give "extreme" answers in which they strongly agree or disagree, and that they are less confident in the accuracy of their own answers.[9]

Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (CSWEP) provides a comprehensive annotated bibliography on research related to women in the economics profession.[10]

Statistics

[edit]

The number of undergraduate women majoring in economics in the United States peaked in the mid to late 1990s and has decreased ever since. Nationwide there are about three males for every female student majoring in economics, and this ratio has not changed for more than 20 years.[11] Women earn the majority of undergraduate degrees across all subjects in the United States, but in 2016 only 35% of economic majors were women. This is the same percentage as the early 1980s.[12]

In 2016 the share of women in PhD economics programs was 31%. This share has not increased in the last 20 years.[13]

Of the 500 doctorate degrees awarded in economics to US citizens and permanent residents in 2014 in the United States, only 157 were awarded to women.[14]

In the United Kingdom, women make up 57% of all undergraduate students, but only 27% of those studying pure economics.[15]

Women's participation in economics is lower than in any other social science. By many measures, the gender gap in economics is the largest of any discipline. For example, women received about 30% of doctorate and bachelor's degrees in economics in 2014, compared with 45% to 60% of degrees in business, humanities, and the STEM fields.[16]

Women are notoriously underrepresented at the top of the economics field. Just 8 of the 140 Fed presidents appointed since 1914 have been women.[17]

In addition, women are vastly underrepresented in Economics Nobel Prize awards, as women have won a Nobel Prize 58 times, but only twice in economics, and one of the two, Elinor Ostrom, had a degree in political science.[18]

Similarly, women are rarely selected for other prominent economics awards. For example, The John Bates Clark Medal is awarded by the American Economic Association to "that American economist under the age of forty who is adjudged to have made a significant contribution to economic thought and knowledge." This award was started in 1947, and the first time it was awarded to a woman, Susan C. Athey, was in 2007. This award has been given out 42 times, but only 5 times to women, with two of these being in the past two years (2019, 2020).

In 2020, only 22% of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) affiliates were women. In 2020, for NBER Faculty Research Fellows, of those who tend to be more recent appointments and are usually untenured, there were 103 women and 195 men, with women representing 34.6%. For NBER Research Associates, of those who tend to have been appointed earlier and who all have tenure, there were 255 women and 1051 men, with women representing 19.5%.[19]

Strategies

[edit]

One proposed strategy to increase the number of women in economics is to encourage mentoring relationships between female students and female faculty members. Increasing the hiring of female faculty members can be a way to also subsequently increase the number of female students.[20] Male dominated fields might be off-putting to many female students due to biases against women, and female professors might help mitigate this concern.[citation needed]

In 2017 the top 20 university economic departments in Europe had 12.87% of full professors who were female.[21]

Another strategy that many American universities have taken is implementing clubs designated for women in economics. Top universities such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton all have versions of this club. Yale University states that "The goal of the Women in Economics (WiE) organization is to support women, non-binary, and underrepresented minority students pursuing a degree in economics  and to introduce more undergraduates to the field."[22] While this club is a relatively new phenomenon across American universities, there are many other STEM clubs for women, such as the Society of Women Engineers, with similar goals.

Notable women in economics

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Larson, Erik (September 21, 2017). "New Research: Diversity + Inclusion = Better Decision Making at Work". Forbes. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
  • ^ Sarsons, Heather. 2015. "Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work." Harvard Economics Department Working Paper. December 3, 2015.
  • ^ Maclay, Kathleen (January 11, 2018). "Fighting Misogyny in Economics: Alice Wu, Take a Bow". Berkeley News. Retrieved October 29, 2018.
  • ^ Wu, Alice H. 2017. "Gender Stereotyping in Academia: Evidence from Economics Job Market Rumors Forum." SSRN 3051462 (accessed October 29, 2018).
  • ^ Dupas, Pascaline; Sasser Modestino, Alicia; Niederle, Muriel; Wolfers, Justin (2021). "Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars". doi:10.3386/w28494. S2CID 233773267. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • ^ Sarsons, Heather. "Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • ^ Elmes, John. "Publishing While Female". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 8 March 2021.
  • ^ "CSWEP: Survey & Annual Report". 8 March 2021.
  • ^ Sarsons, Heather; Xu, Guo (8 March 2021). "Confidence Men? Gender and Confidence: Evidence among Top Economists". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • ^ "Annotated Bibliography on Research Related to Women in the Economics Profession".
  • ^ "Undergraduate Women in Economics (UWE)". 8 March 2021.
  • ^ Wolfers. "Why Women's Voices Are Scarce In Economics".
  • ^ "CSWEP: Survey and Annual Report". American Economic Association. 2016.
  • ^ Bayer, Rouse, Amanda, Cecilia (Fall 2016). "Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 30 (4): 221–242. doi:10.1257/jep.30.4.221.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • ^ Crawford, C, Davies, NM and Smith, S (forthcoming), 'Why do so few women study economics? Evidence from England', Royal Economic Society
  • ^ Bayer, Amanda; Rouse, Cecilia Elena (8 March 2021). "Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 30 (4): 221–242. doi:10.1257/jep.30.4.221.
  • ^ "Timelines | FRASER | St. Louis Fed". fraser.stlouisfed.org. Retrieved 2021-03-08.
  • ^ "The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2009". NobelPrize.org. Retrieved 2021-03-08.
  • ^ Chari, Anusha; Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul (October 2017). "Gender Representation in Economics across Topics and Time" (PDF). nber.org. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved 21 March 2023.
  • ^ Neumark, David (1996). "Women Helping Women? Role-Model and Mentoring Effects on Female Ph.D. Student in Economics". The National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w5733. S2CID 149662843.
  • ^ Giraneza Birekeraho, Ariane (March 7, 2018). "How many female economics professors in top European Universities?". Bruegel. Retrieved November 27, 2018.
  • ^ "Women in Economics | Department of Economics". economics.yale.edu. Retrieved 2021-02-25.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_economics&oldid=1185328980"

    Category: 
    Women economists
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 errors: missing periodical
    CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list
    Articles with limited geographic scope from December 2018
    All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
    Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2018
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from January 2019
     



    This page was last edited on 16 November 2023, at 01:06 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki