Richard Stallman's personal site.
For current political commentary, see
the daily
political notes.
RMS's Bio |
The GNU Project
What's bad about:
Airbnb |
Amazon |
Amtrak |
Ancestry |
Apple |
Change.org |
Cloudflare |
Discord |
Ebooks |
Eventbrite |
Evernote |
Ex-Twitter |
Facebook |
FLIXbus |
Frito-Lay |
Frontier |
Google |
Gofundme |
Grubhub |
In-N-Out Burger |
Intel |
LinkedIn |
Lyft |
Meetup |
Microsoft |
Netflix |
Patreon |
Pay Toilets |
Skype |
Slack |
Spotify |
Tesla |
Threads |
Ticketmaster |
Uber |
Wendy's |
WhatsApp |
Zoom |
Reasons not to use Apple
Censorship
Spying
Worker abuse
Right to repair
Tax avoidance
Other reasons
Censorship
Apple reportedly had objections to what Jon Stewart said in his video
program —itcanceled the show after he had criticized China, and something the article describes as "AI".
(It could be that what he criticized was actually large language
models, which may be an important issue but are not "intelligence".)
We should protect the media from censorship by commercial interests by
not allowing companies that make or sell other products to be involved
in the business of making or distributing audio or video programs.
I expect that Apple does much worse things than this in its distribution
of video programs. For instance, I suspect it requires viewers to
run nonfree software with DRM, compels them to identify themselves,
and imposes an immoral "antisocializing" contract where you promise
not to share a copy with anyone else.
(Not coincidentally, this resembles the bad things that commercial e-books do.)
My response to any disservice which asks me to accept of those forms
of mistreatment is to invite it to jump in the lake.
●
Apple imposed a new limit on file-sharing following a demand by the
Chinese government.
●
*Apple Suppressing Human Rights Critics* for China.
●
Apple has
blocked Telegram from upgrading its app for a month. This
evidently has to do with Russia's command to Apple to block
Telegram in Russia.
The Telegram client is free software on other platforms, but no
apps are free on an iThing
Apple used its censorship system to enforce China's censorship
by
blocking
distribution of the New York Times app.
More about Apple's
censorship
of apps and other malicious functionalities in Apple
software.
Apple appears to be censoring
all bitcoin apps for iThings.
It should be illegal to make or distribute computers which are
platforms for censorship.
Apple demonstrates the arbitrariness of its censorship
by blocking
an app that tells people with text messages when US drone attacks
kill civilians.
The author said that this app was meant to raise awareness.
I hope Apple's censorship of it raises awareness.
●
Apple censors information
about abortion providers.
●
As of 2015, Apple
systematically bans apps that endorse abortion
rights or would help women find abortions.
This particular political slant
affects other Apple services.
●
Apple's mail service silently
censors the mail people send.
●
Apple deauthorized
a Wikileaks access application, using censorship to support
censorship.
Apple censors iTunes ebooks —
banning all mention of Amazon.
People should not do business with Amazon, which mistreats authors, publishers, its workers,
and its customers. Ms Lisle's presupposition that the goal of
success is all that matters is not admirable.
However, that doesn't justify Apple's censorship.
Of course, publishing in iTunes was already bad for other reasons,
such as DRM, and requiring users to use nonfree software.
●
Apple
banned
from iTunes the erotic novel, The Proof of the Honey,
saying it was because of the cover.
Apple censored a game for the iThings called Angry
Syrians, which is a political parody of Angry Birds.
Apple said it was﹃defamatory or
offensive﹄— to the dictator Assad, apparently.
Apple cut off access to the app store for Iranian users of iMonsters.
The underlying wrong here is that Apple gave itself censorship power
over everyone that uses those computers — power that we should not
allow anyone to have.
●
Steve Jobs used Apple's censorship power to impose prudery on the
net, and this is part of why Stumblr
is now
deleting everything that won't be rated G.
I tried to view a Tumblr page, but its contents did not appear.
It seemed to be totally dependent on nonfee Javascript code.
Whatever may disappear from Tumblr, I personally will not miss
it. Nonetheless, I am concerned about this issue because
creeping prudish censorship is dangerous in general; we should
fight it in general.
Let us therefore invite Apple to go fuck itself and post a
selfie of that act on Stumblr.
Apple has censored an application designed to help Hong Kong protesters communicate.
Apple surely did this because of threats from China. (We are not supposed to suggest that a
"good corporate citizen" would uphold freedom at the cost of profits.) But the reason Apple
could do this is that it gave itself censorship power over applications for iMonsters, through the proprietary code of the operating system.
Apple plans to require that all application software for MacOS be approved by Apple first.
Offering a checking service as an option could be useful and would not be wrong. Requiring users to get Apple's approval is tyranny. Apple says the check will only look for malware (not counting the malware that is part of the operating system), but Apple could change that policy step by step. Or perhaps Apple will decide that helping Hong Kong protesters constitutes malware.
As of 2020, Apple still censors for China — and acts as China's enforcer to make
other companies censor for China.
Apple is responsible for its actions, but one general problem that tends
to encourage this behavior is the fact that companies are multinational.
China will always find a way to censor companies that do business in China.
And so will many other countries.
I think we must limit a forum to doing actual business in one single
country. It could allow people to post and read without asking them
what countries they are in. This way, other countries would have no
levers over the company, no way to make it censor anything.
●
In 2021, Apple has been
shifting
more production to China.
Spying
Apple spies on its users, and helps others spy on them.
If you carry a cell phone, it
tells Big Brother where you are. Apple wants to hand out the information too.
Using the lever of﹃You have a choice, but unless you say yes,
your old activities will stop working﹄is something that Apple has
done before, with malicious "upgrades". Apple ostensibly doesn't force
people to accept the new nasty thing; it just punishes them if they
don't.
Apple left
a security hole in iTunes unfixed for 3 years after being
informed about the problem. During that time, governments used
that security hole to invade people's computers.
●
Apple's Capitulation to China's
VPN Crack-Down Will Return to Haunt it
at
Home.
●
Apple has outsourced its user data storage in China to a company
controlled by the Communist Party of the province of Guizhou
●Apple's nonfree Safari browser spies on users for the Chinese company Tencent.
Apple can track iMonsters even when they are suspended.
This distributed bluetooth network is said to be "secure", but it is obviously not secure from Apple or from governments that can command Apple's obedience (such as the US and China).
The new version of MacOS — and therefore the new generation of Macs
— informs Apple of every time the machine launches a program.
The Guardian press seems blissfully unaware of this spying. It even
repeats Apple's claims to help users protect their privacy — but only
some aspects of their privacy.
Just as software developers have redefined "security" to mean
"security against everyone but us", Apple is redefining "privacy"
to mean "privacy from everyone but us."
People might want to post comments there (be civil about it!) or
send letters to the editor. I am sure there are dozens of publications
which could use the same sort of response.
Worker abuse
●
Apple persists in disregarding the widespread
blatant abuse of the workers that build its products.
●
In 2015, the workers making Apple products in China are
still
mistreated.
●
Apple uses
sweatshops in China to build its products.
●
Sweatshops are good for Foxconn (and for Apple), but
not for workers.
●
An undercover journalist reports on the horrible conditions in the
Foxconn factory that makes iThings: still
horrible in 2012.
●
Foxconn closed schools and
forced the students to work building iThings.
●
Working conditions at Apple's other Chinese suppliers are even worse
than in Foxconn.
●
Today's Apple
Pegatron sweatshops are even nastier than the Foxconn sweatshops
it used before.
Just because you're not pregnant, should that make it ok to require
you to work 11 hours a day, 6 days a week? Apple is culpable if its
products are made by people working a longer workweek than is allowed
in the US.
●
Mistreatment of workers making Apple computers
continues in 2014.
This is a general injustice, and will continue until the "brand"
companies are made legally responsible for treatment of the workers
that do their work, just as if they were direct employees of those
companies. But that doesn't excuse Apple.
Tax avoidance
Apple practices tax avoidance using loopholes and lobbying.
Apple pioneered techniques for avoiding the US corporate tax
(even though it is far too low) in order
to pay next to no tax.
The loopholes that Apple uses would be closed, if not for the
political power of business. "Free trade" treaties give business
increased power to block such changes, so we must abolish them to
break business's power.
The Apple CEO met with the troll and said: "Tim Cook from Apple, I'm
here to talk to the President-elect about the things we can do to help
you achieve your stated goal."
This text was transcribed from a video recording. I can't offer a
reference because the web site requires nonfree Javascript code.
Cook was
angling for a big tax cut for multinational businesses.
Apple Avoided $40 Billion in Taxes (by lobbying for a tax cut). Now
It Wants a Gold Star?
Right to repair
●
Apple Is
Lobbying Against Your Right to Repair iPhones, New York State
Records Confirm.
Apple
forbids recyclers of Apple computers from extracting any
usable spare parts from them, by imposing nasty contracts.
Apple's conduct should be forbidden by law so that no company can
ever do this.
The iPhone 7
has
DRM specifically to brick it if anyone other than an authorized
repair agent fixes it.
The term
"lock"
is inadequate to describe this sort of malware. Let's use other words
that show what's really going on.
Apple faces trial in Australia for
bricking devices because they had had
an "unauthorized" repair.
Apple machines are built with unusual screws that
make it difficult for the owner to take them apart.
Along with technical barriers,
Apple lobbies against "right to repair" laws.
●
Apple is
campaigning against right-to-repair laws that weaken
the unjust effect of the DMCA.
Apple is putting DRM on batteries, and the system software turns off
certain features when batteries are replaced other than by Apple.
●
Reevaluating Apple's reputation for good design: design for nonrepairability is not good design.
Other reasons
Apple charges a high price for storage on "Apple's cloud", which
turns out to be a cloudy thing: it
farms
out the data to other companies.
Apple iThings pioneered a new level of restricting the users:
they were the first general purpose computers to impose censorship
over what programs the user can install. Apple practices
Digital Restrictions Management
in many other ways too.
Ebooks with DRM won't work on an iThing that is jailbroken, due
to intentional sabotage by Apple.
E-books with digital handcuffs are products designed to attack your
freedom, much like the iThing itself.
Apple
doesn't trust, or respect, those who use its products.
Apple
exploits the app developers mercilessly, aside from a few stars
whose role is to give a misleading impression of what developers can
expect.
I can't sympathize much with those app developers, since they are
making proprietary software. They all deserve to fail. However, that
doesn't excuse the way Apple treats them.
Apple lures people into the business of developing apps with visions of
the great wealth that a few of them get.
Most just fail, often losing a substantial investment.
Anyone who intentionally develops proprietary software (i.e., does not
respect users' freedom) deserves no sympathy, but that doesn't
excuse Apple for luring people into it. Some of them would not have
tried to develop proprietary software if not for Apple.
●
Apple is a major patent aggressor. Here's a
rather absurd patent that Apple will surely use against other
mobile computers. This joins many other patents which Apple is already
using to attack free software.
Lots of iThing users complained that they did not want the U2
album "gift" that Apple stuck them with — and that it was
hard
to delete.
These complaints focus on a superficial problem, reflecting the
shallow thinking that Apple instills in its users. Ironically,
though, this superficial problem reflects a much deeper problem that
the complainers have failed to notice: the unjust power that Apple has
imposed on whoever uses an iThing or iTunes.
Apple turns a
blind eye to environment in China.
Although Apple has joined EPEAT again, it does
not cover the iThings — only the Macintosh.
●
Apple practices planned
obsolescence for the iBad — in just two years.
Apple store staff are taught
twisted
psychological manipulation.
The mere practice of referring to service staff as "geniuses"
is dishonest already.
●
Apple stores
are cunningly
designed theater, somewhat like Disneyland.
The employees are all young because people with dependents can't
afford the low pay.
Apple devices lock users in
solely to Apple services by being incompatible with all others,
both the ethical ones and the unethical ones.
●
When Apple suspects a user of fraud, it judges the case secretly and presents the verdict as a fait accompli. The punishment to a user found guilty is being cut off for life, which more-or-less cripples the user's Apple devices forever. There is no appeal.
The European Union wants to require small electronic devices to have
a standard USB-C charging port. Apple is against it,
because it profits from imposed incompatibility.
Naturally, Apple cites "innovation" as a reason to sell incompatible
power adapters. Our society systematically overstates the importance
of innovation, because many businesses find that a useful excuse for
mistreating users in various ways.
Copyright (c) 2012-2018 Richard Stallman
Verbatim copying and redistribution of this entire page are permitted
provided this notice is preserved.