YouTube Responds to McCain Campaign's Letter

DEEPLINKS BLOG By michael October 15, 2008

YouTube Responds to McCain Campaign's Letter

Share It Yesterday, we wrote about the McCain-Palin campaign's letter to YouTube, highlighting how DMCA takedown notices can make online speech disappear from the Internet, even when the claims of infringement plainly lack any merit. Today, we bring you YouTube's response. YouTube's response points out, much like we did yesterday, that the McCain-Palin campaign's proposed solution (human review of DMCA takedown notices targeting videos posted by political candidates and campaigns) favors speech from one particular class of users. YouTube says that it "tri[es] to be careful not to favor one category of content on [its] site over others, and to treat all of [its] users fairly, regardless of whether they are an individual, a large corporation, or a candidate for public office." At the end of the day, we agree with YouTube that "[t]he real problem here is individuals and entities that abuse the DMCA takedown process." And we commend YouTube for taking action in some cases where it has identified false takedown notices. Nonetheless, although YouTube may not be the source of the problem, that doesn't mean it can't do more to be part of the solution. YouTube notes that it can't always be certain whether a video qualifies as fair use, and that it can't know whether the poster has a license to the content. That's all true. But just because YouTube can't always identify sham takedown notices doesn't mean it can't sometimes know the answer. Using a short excerpt from a news broadcast and commenting on it in a political commercial is clearly fair use. And there are many other examples of clear fair uses, as well. We'd love to see YouTube take further action, so that takedown notices directed at clearly non-infringing videos can't be used to silence speech. As we said yesterday, stay tuned for more on this topic from us soon.

Related Updates

Deeplinks Blog byCory Doctorow | October 3, 2025

What Europe’s New Gig Work Law Means for Unions and Technology

At EFF, we believe that tech rights are worker’s rights. Since the pandemic, workers of all kinds have been subjected to increasingly invasive forms of bossware. These are the “algorithmic management” tools that surveil workers on and off the job, often running on devices that (nominally) belong...

Deeplinks Blog byCorynne McSherry, Tori Noble | July 18, 2025

EFF to Court: The DMCA Didn't Create a New Right of Attribution, You Shouldn't Either

Amid a wave of lawsuits targeting how AI companies use copyrighted works to train large language models that generate new works, a peculiar provision of copyright law is suddenly in the spotlight: Section 1202 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Section 1202 restricts intentionally removing or changing copyright management...

Deeplinks Blog byCory Doctorow | June 18, 2025

Apple to Australians: You’re Too Stupid to Choose Your Own Apps

Apple has released a scaremongering, self-serving warning aimed at the Australian government, claiming that Australians will be overrun by a parade of digital horribles if Australia follows the European Union’s lead and regulates Apple’s “walled garden.” The EU’s Digital Markets Act is a big, complex, ambitious law that...

EFF Presents "Fix Copyright", a design featuring a cartoon mouse hacking his tractor.

Deeplinks Blog byKatharine Trendacosta | January 27, 2025

It's Copyright Week 2025: Join Us in the Fight for Better Copyright Law and Policy

Copyright is no longer—if it ever was—a niche concern of certain industries. As corporations have pushed to expand copyright, they have made it everyone’s problem. And that means they don’t get to make the law in secret anymore.

Deeplinks Blog byTori Noble | January 23, 2025

Second Circuit Rejects Record Labels’ Attempt to Rewrite the DMCA

In a major win for creator communities, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has once again handed video streaming site Vimeo a solid win in its long-running legal battle with Capitol Records and a host of other record labels.The labels claimed that Vimeo was liable...

Deeplinks Blog byBetty Gedlu, Mitch Stoltz | December 12, 2024

EFF Speaks Out in Court for Citizen Journalists

No one gets to abuse copyright to shut down debate. Because of that, we at EFF represent Channel 781, a group of citizen journalists whose YouTube channel was temporarily shut down following copyright infringement claims made by Waltham Community Access Corporation (WCAC). As part of that case, the federal court...

Deeplinks Blog byCorynne McSherry | August 19, 2024

NO FAKES – A Dream for Lawyers, a Nightmare for Everyone Else

Performers and ordinary humans are increasingly concerned that they may be replaced or defamed by AI-generated imitations. We’re seeing a host of bills designed to address that concern – but every one just generates new problems. Case in point: the NO FAKES Act. We flagged numerous flaws in a “discussion...

Deeplinks Blog byKit Walsh | August 2, 2024

Federal Appeals Court Rules That Fair Use May Be Narrowed to Serve Hollywood Profits

Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a ban on reading any copyrighted work that is encumbered by access restrictions. It makes it illegal for you to read and understand the code that determines how your phone or car works and whether those devices are safe. It makes...

Takedown Hall of Shame banner image: warning sign in the style of glitchy video

Press Release | July 24, 2024

Journalists Sue Massachusetts TV Corporation Over Bogus YouTube Takedown Demands

BOSTON—A citizen journalists’ group represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a federal lawsuit today against a Massachusetts community-access television company for falsely convincing YouTube to take down video clips of city government meetings. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts...

Deeplinks Blog byAaron Jue | June 18, 2024

Ah, Steamboat Willie. It’s been too long. 🐭

Did you know Disney’s Steamboat Willie entered the public domain this year? Since its 1928 debut, U.S. Congress has made multiple changes to copyright law, extending Disney’s ownership of this cultural icon for almost a century. A century.Creativity should spark more creativity.That’s not how intellectual property laws are...