![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi, I watch the Fix a typo in one click page and disagreed with some of your recent tags so I have redone them. In general if you are unsure it is best to leave the word for someone else to correct. A Google search of the word in question can confirm it is a real word, e.g. frum, ssam and exites. I was baffled by the article Seifert fiber space. TSventon (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, what are your recent edits about? They don't seem to change anything. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
The former edit was an accident, and the latter changed {{R to section}} to {{R to anchor}} . Apologies for making a few pointless edits. ― Qwerfjkl|✉ 09:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Please respect & maintain the empty line between the #REDIRECT ...
line and {{Redirect category shell}}
line when making such mass changes. Thanks. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 19:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have reviewed a redirect request, but you have not closed the submission. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories/Reviewing instructions. Alternatively, you can use User:Enterprisey/AFCRHS.js, which creates the redirect and closes the discussion for you when you have reviewed a submission. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't know how these tools work, as I've never tried them, but in your semi-automated edits to redirects using sagittarius and Capricorn, {{R from ambiguous term}} would be an appropriate template to put on those redirect pages. – wbm1058 (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Participatory development communication, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Planner and Implementer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for thanking my edit! It means a lot to me. HiCooldude😎 (talk) 21:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Just as a note, I've removed your A7 tag on Madeleine de Choiseul. I don't tend to inform people when I do because it can seem patronizing to long-term users, but I noticed you were a newer user and felt you could do with a friendly note. 🙂 The subject of that article was a monarch, which is definitely a claim to notability, and in addition anyone who lived before or in the earliest days of the printing press and had their name written down is at least not an A7 case; she did live in its earlier decades, so more ambiguous than before (when it's a common position that anyone whose name was recorded is notable, full stop), but still far back enough in history that an A7 tag for the most clear-cut possible cases of non-notability should be held back from. You might want to read Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance, which is a helpful guide to when A7 does and doesn't apply, as well as Wikipedia:Common claims of significance or importance, which lists some cases an article doesn't count as A7, even if it wouldn't survive AfD. Vaticidalprophet 22:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
You declined this request because "You are suggesting a category, not a redirect." However, the person was requesting a category redirect (just a redirect from category namespace), not requesting a category. (I'm not the person who asked for it; I just saw the request.) 74.98.192.38 (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Why did you find it necessary to revert to a ref that points at a "404" page when there's and perfectly good page in the original citation?--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 21:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've come across a few pages where you edited some typos from Typo Team. While it's great and very helpful that you are fixing those, could you also delete those fixed entries/words from the list? That way everyone can see what still needs to be done :) Strickesel (talk) 10:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 15:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 16:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to List of home video companies: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 10:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Message added 06:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
This edit was not constructive - the other IP was correct in their revert. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 04:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 06:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Qwerfjkl,
I was watching that game on TV when Pillar got hit in the face by that ball. Scary for sure! Anyways, thank you for the welcome! I'll look forward to contributing more in the very near future!
The Special Barnstar | |
You are doing a great job! Keep it up. ^_^ QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 20:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC) |
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 20:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Please take a look at this draft. This is an article about the philosophical center of the largest state university in Russia. 2A00:1FA1:127:1EFA:804B:AC36:C933:1054 (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 21:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)These articles should be deleted too:
--Pihamies (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 12:44, 23 May 2021 (UTC)At the Elon Musk article, I had requested only the removal of "energy physics" as a program to which Musk was accepted. It's evident and cited that he was accepted to materials science, so your removal of the whole sentence was immediately reverted. Can you please try again? 73.71.251.64 (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 20:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Category:Unofficial leaders has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Unofficial leaders has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past four months (February through May 2021).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 21st issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
My apologies for this long-overdue issue, and if I missed any scripts.
Hopefully going forward we can go back to monthly releases - any help would be appreciated. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 2401:4900:4463:D333:C4D7:4813:B91D:D13B (talk) 05:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Edited false information on Sejal Kumar page
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Qwerfjkl. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until {{{expiry}}}. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! GirthSummit (blether) 10:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 10:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 10:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to spiteful messages, as you did more than once on my talk page, you may be blocked from editing. 76.160.6.50 (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
This entry on David Mitzi is unneeded & misleading. David Mitzi is only one of 7 researchers. Zero info on CZTS was removed. The same research paper is also cited above: "Device Characteristics of CZTSSe Thin-Film Solar Cells with 12.6% Efficiency" "Wei Wang, Mark T. Winkler , Oki Gunawan , Tayfun Gokmen, Teodor K. Todorov,Yu Zhu, and David B. Mitzi" The lead researcher is usually listed 1st in a research paper, Wei Wang. David Mitzi is listed dead last; IE, least contribution. This reads just like a resume. 71.218.243.31 (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 21:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Device Characteristics of CZTSSe Thin-Film Solar Cells with 12.6% Efficiency Wei Wang, Mark T. Winkler, Oki Gunawan, Tayfun Gokmen, Teodor K. Todorov, Yu Zhu, David B. Mitzi First published: 27 November 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201301465 Citations: 2,006
A 12.6% Cu2ZnSnSxSe4–x (CZTSSe) solar cell is presented with detailed device characteristics. Both short-circuit current density (Jsc) and open circuit voltage (Voc) increase in the 12.6% champion, relative to previous devices, due to better bulk CZTSSe quality and improved optical architecture. The reduction in Voc deficit shows opportunities to push CZTSSe solar cells to higher efficiency. 71.218.243.31 (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 21:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)References
Thanks for showing me the script for getting visual editor everywhere! —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC) |
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 20:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Regarding [1], your edit-summary is about the compound word "stairsteps", but it looks like the only thing your edit did was re-order the hatnotes. DMacks (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 16:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
If you carry out a Google search you will find plenty of references to it. The most recent is at [2]. Please now create the redirect. Thanks. 77.99.37.105 (talk) 19:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
I dont understand whats going on. now my draft is declined due to "not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article" when all along since it was approved the sources were the problem? how can this be and what excatly isnt written in the formal tone? can you explain please since i made sure its written good and a few editors already reviwed it and the pnly problem was the sources ? --Shanisun (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Shanisun (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Hi, I love your user page, I might copy some things into mine. Thanks for having such a great userpage :) -- Justiyaya (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)