edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Two transclusions Painting17 (talk) 19:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Keep Almost all the characters on this template are main or supporting at some point in the universe. Although only two characters have their own pages, the rest are en masse at List of Fast & Furious Characters. If the tree template is removed, it should at least be recreated on the aforementioned list/link as a way to visualize the link between characters. CBassett1 (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
MergetoList of Fast & Furious characters, and it can be split if more pages are made/undraftified for the characters. MONET chou (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Three transclusions Painting17 (talk) 19:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Created by blocked user. Almost entirely cruft. Painting17 (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relistedon2023 July 12. ✗plicit 00:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Southland Bowling League's operations have been folded into Conference USA; that conference's navbox contains all of these links, as well as a link to the Southland Bowling League page, rendering this template redundant. fuzzy510 (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was mergetoTemplate:British Virgin Islands topics. ✗plicit 10:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:British Virgin Islands with Template:British Virgin Islands topics.
Both navboxes are covering the same subject. There should only be one main BVI navbox, British Virgin Islands topics. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Possible fork of Template:Gazetted officers ranks and insignias of Kerala Police, same Ref names which appear as errors here. Not experienced in looking at forks (and even whether they are or not), so happy to concede to others' thinking on this. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Keep These seem like meaningfully-distinct templates, not content forking, to me, and the fact that the creator failed to copy the reference syntax properly does not inherently turn these into forks. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure this is even a template - should it become an actual article and go to mainspace? Or should it just be deleted? Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Delete. It's content and should be in an article directly as content. Its presence is a failure somewhere to write correct WP:SUMMARY articles that could be pointed to for specific articles. Izno (talk) 05:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Keep: NBOMe toxicology is to be included in multiple articles in compounds derived from the 25x-NBx series which have their own Wikipedia page, and is meant to be included via transclusion. Using substitution doesn't serve this purpose as it is not transcluded, and using a template is the only method AFAIK for transclusion and avoiding duplicating content by copying and pasting within Wikipedia. --WikiLinuz {talk} 20:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
-
Comment: I think I may have misunderstood that material should be placed in "template" namespace if it were to be used for transclusion. I will consult the helpdesk for assistance. --WikiLinuz {talk} 04:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Content transcluded through WP:SELECTIVETRANSCLUSION. --WikiLinuz {talk} 00:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
