Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 

















Editing Campus sexual assault

















Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 
















Appearance
   

 










You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log inorcreate an account, your edits will be attributed to a username, among other benefits.

 Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.


Latest revision Your text
Line 195: Line 195:

* In July 2015 a California court ruled that the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) acted improperly by using a deeply flawed system to adjudicate a sexual assault allegation and sanctioning the accused based on a process that violated his rights. The student was not given adequate opportunity to challenge the accusations and the panel relied on information deliberately withheld from the student despite repeated requests. The judge also admonished a dean who had punitively increased the student's penalty without explanation each time he appealed, while the student's counsel criticized the dean for a perceived conflict of interest.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Moyer|first1=Justin Wm.|title=University unfair to student accused of sexual assault, says California judge|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/14/judge-ucsd-used-unfair-procedures-when-it-found-male-student-responsible-for-sexual-misconduct/|access-date=22 July 2015|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=14 July 2015}}</ref>

* In July 2015 a California court ruled that the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) acted improperly by using a deeply flawed system to adjudicate a sexual assault allegation and sanctioning the accused based on a process that violated his rights. The student was not given adequate opportunity to challenge the accusations and the panel relied on information deliberately withheld from the student despite repeated requests. The judge also admonished a dean who had punitively increased the student's penalty without explanation each time he appealed, while the student's counsel criticized the dean for a perceived conflict of interest.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Moyer|first1=Justin Wm.|title=University unfair to student accused of sexual assault, says California judge|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/14/judge-ucsd-used-unfair-procedures-when-it-found-male-student-responsible-for-sexual-misconduct/|access-date=22 July 2015|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=14 July 2015}}</ref>

* In August 2015, a Tennessee judge ruled against the [[University of Tennessee-Chattanooga]] who expelled a student for rape under a "yes-means-yes" policy. The student had been cleared by the school which later reversed its opinion on appeal using an affirmative consent policy. The judge found the school had no evidence the accuser did not consent, and found the school had "improperly shifted the burden of proof and imposed an untenable standard upon" the student "to disprove the accusation" that he assaulted a classmate.<ref name="Affirmative3">{{cite news|last1=Anderson|first1=Kendi|title=Judge rules former UTC wrestler accused of rape shouldn't have been expelled|url=http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2015/aug/12/judge-rules-favor-utc-student-accused-rape/319413/|access-date=14 August 2015|newspaper=[[Chattanooga Times Free Press]]|date=12 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Schow|first1=Asche|title=Judge rules university can't shift burden of proof onto the accused|url=http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-rules-university-cant-shift-burden-of-proof-onto-accused/article/2569953|access-date=14 August 2015|magazine=[[Washington Examiner]]|date=10 August 2015}}</ref>

* In August 2015, a Tennessee judge ruled against the [[University of Tennessee-Chattanooga]] who expelled a student for rape under a "yes-means-yes" policy. The student had been cleared by the school which later reversed its opinion on appeal using an affirmative consent policy. The judge found the school had no evidence the accuser did not consent, and found the school had "improperly shifted the burden of proof and imposed an untenable standard upon" the student "to disprove the accusation" that he assaulted a classmate.<ref name="Affirmative3">{{cite news|last1=Anderson|first1=Kendi|title=Judge rules former UTC wrestler accused of rape shouldn't have been expelled|url=http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2015/aug/12/judge-rules-favor-utc-student-accused-rape/319413/|access-date=14 August 2015|newspaper=[[Chattanooga Times Free Press]]|date=12 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Schow|first1=Asche|title=Judge rules university can't shift burden of proof onto the accused|url=http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-rules-university-cant-shift-burden-of-proof-onto-accused/article/2569953|access-date=14 August 2015|magazine=[[Washington Examiner]]|date=10 August 2015}}</ref>

* In June 2017, a divided panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit]] found that the [[University of Houston]] did not violate the Constitution's [[Due Process Clause]] or [[Title IX]] when it expelled a student for committing sexual assault in a dorm room then abandoning the nude victim in a dorm elevator, as well as his girlfriend, who had recorded the assault and shared the video on social media.<ref>{{Bluebook journal |last=Note| title=Fifth Circuit Holds that Due Process Standards May Be Lowered in the Presence of "Overwhelming" Video and Photographic Evidence of Guilt| volume=131 | journal=[[Harvard Law Review|Harv. L. Rev.]] | page=634 | url=https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/634-641_Online.pdf| year=2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite court |litigants=Plummer v. University of Houston|vol=860|reporter=F.3d |opinion=767 |court=5th Cir.|date=2017|url= https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6012165481783480076 }}</ref>

* In June 2017, a divided panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit]] found that the [[University of Houston]] did not violate the Constitution's [[Due Process Clause]] or [[Title IX]] when it expelled a student for committing sexual assault in a dorm room then abandoning the nude victim in a dorm elevator, as well as his girlfriend, who had recorded the assault and shared the video on social media.<ref>{{Bluebook journal |last=Note| title=Fifth Circuit Holds that Due Process Standards May Be Lowered in the Presence of "Overwhelming" Video and Photographic Evidence of Guilt| volume=131 | journal=[[Harvard Law Review|Harv. L. Rev.]] | page=634 | url=https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/634-641_Online.pdf| year=2017}}.</ref><ref>{{cite court |litigants=Plummer v. University of Houston|vol=860|reporter=F.3d |opinion=767 |court=5th Cir.|date=2017|url= https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6012165481783480076 }}</ref>

*A former Boston College student has won more than $100,000 from his alma mater after a federal jury found the private nonprofit institution mishandled sexual assault allegations against him. The case is significant in that it is the first sex assault lawsuit against a university to reach a jury trial since 2011, when the Obama administration rewrote the rules for how college officials should investigate and arbitrate sexual violence on campuses.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Jury sides with former Boston College student accused of sexual assault|language=en|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/09/25/jury-sides-former-boston-college-student-accused-sexual-assault|access-date=2021-10-25}}</ref>

*A former Boston College student has won more than $100,000 from his alma mater after a federal jury found the private nonprofit institution mishandled sexual assault allegations against him. The case is significant in that it is the first sex assault lawsuit against a university to reach a jury trial since 2011, when the Obama administration rewrote the rules for how college officials should investigate and arbitrate sexual violence on campuses.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Jury sides with former Boston College student accused of sexual assault|language=en|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/09/25/jury-sides-former-boston-college-student-accused-sexual-assault|access-date=2021-10-25}}</ref>

* In February 2022, The University of California agreed to pay almost $250m to over 200 women who were allegedly sexually assaulted by a campus gynecologist.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60313101|title=US university in $250m payout for doctor's sex abuse|work=BBC News |date=9 February 2022}}</ref>

* In February 2022, The University of California agreed to pay almost $250m to over 200 women who were allegedly sexually assaulted by a campus gynecologist.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60313101|title=US university in $250m payout for doctor's sex abuse|work=BBC News |date=9 February 2022}}</ref>

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Copy and paste: – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · §   Cite your sources: <ref></ref>


{{}}   {{{}}}   |   []   [[]]   [[Category:]]   #REDIRECT [[]]   &nbsp;   <s></s>   <sup></sup>   <sub></sub>   <code></code>   <pre></pre>   <blockquote></blockquote>   <ref></ref> <ref name="" />   {{Reflist}}   <references />   <includeonly></includeonly>   <noinclude></noinclude>   {{DEFAULTSORT:}}   <nowiki></nowiki>   <!-- -->   <span class="plainlinks"></span>


Symbols: ~ | ¡ ¿ † ‡ ↔ ↑ ↓ • ¶   # ∞   ‹› «»   ¤ ₳ ฿ ₵ ¢ ₡ ₢ $ ₫ ₯ € ₠ ₣ ƒ ₴ ₭ ₤ ℳ ₥ ₦ № ₧ ₰ £ ៛ ₨ ₪ ৳ ₮ ₩ ¥   ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦   𝄫 ♭ ♮ ♯ 𝄪   © ® ™
Latin: A a Á á À à  â Ä ä Ǎ ǎ Ă ă Ā ā à ã Å å Ą ą Æ æ Ǣ ǣ   B b   C c Ć ć Ċ ċ Ĉ ĉ Č č Ç ç   D d Ď ď Đ đ Ḍ ḍ Ð ð   E e É é È è Ė ė Ê ê Ë ë Ě ě Ĕ ĕ Ē ē Ẽ ẽ Ę ę Ẹ ẹ Ɛ ɛ Ǝ ǝ Ə ə   F f   G g Ġ ġ Ĝ ĝ Ğ ğ Ģ ģ   H h Ĥ ĥ Ħ ħ Ḥ ḥ   I i İ ı Í í Ì ì Î î Ï ï Ǐ ǐ Ĭ ĭ Ī ī Ĩ ĩ Į į Ị ị   J j Ĵ ĵ   K k Ķ ķ   L l Ĺ ĺ Ŀ ŀ Ľ ľ Ļ ļ Ł ł Ḷ ḷ Ḹ ḹ   M m Ṃ ṃ   N n Ń ń Ň ň Ñ ñ Ņ ņ Ṇ ṇ Ŋ ŋ   O o Ó ó Ò ò Ô ô Ö ö Ǒ ǒ Ŏ ŏ Ō ō Õ õ Ǫ ǫ Ọ ọ Ő ő Ø ø Œ œ   Ɔ ɔ   P p   Q q   R r Ŕ ŕ Ř ř Ŗ ŗ Ṛ ṛ Ṝ ṝ   S s Ś ś Ŝ ŝ Š š Ş ş Ș ș Ṣ ṣ ß   T t Ť ť Ţ ţ Ț ț Ṭ ṭ Þ þ   U u Ú ú Ù ù Û û Ü ü Ǔ ǔ Ŭ ŭ Ū ū Ũ ũ Ů ů Ų ų Ụ ụ Ű ű Ǘ ǘ Ǜ ǜ Ǚ ǚ Ǖ ǖ   V v   W w Ŵ ŵ   X x   Y y Ý ý Ŷ ŷ Ÿ ÿ Ỹ ỹ Ȳ ȳ   Z z Ź ź Ż ż Ž ž   ß Ð ð Þ þ Ŋ ŋ Ə ə
Greek: Ά ά Έ έ Ή ή Ί ί Ό ό Ύ ύ Ώ ώ   Α α Β β Γ γ Δ δ   Ε ε Ζ ζ Η η Θ θ   Ι ι Κ κ Λ λ Μ μ   Ν ν Ξ ξ Ο ο Π π   Ρ ρ Σ σ ς Τ τ Υ υ   Φ φ Χ χ Ψ ψ Ω ω   {{Polytonic|}}
Cyrillic: А а Б б В в Г г   Ґ ґ Ѓ ѓ Д д Ђ ђ   Е е Ё ё Є є Ж ж   З з Ѕ ѕ И и І і   Ї ї Й й Ј ј К к   Ќ ќ Л л Љ љ М м   Н н Њ њ О о П п   Р р С с Т т Ћ ћ   У у Ў ў Ф ф Х х   Ц ц Ч ч Џ џ Ш ш   Щ щ Ъ ъ Ы ы Ь ь   Э э Ю ю Я я   ́
IPA: t̪ d̪ ʈ ɖ ɟ ɡ ɢ ʡ ʔ   ɸ β θ ð ʃ ʒ ɕ ʑ ʂ ʐ ç ʝ ɣ χ ʁ ħ ʕ ʜ ʢ ɦ   ɱ ɳ ɲ ŋ ɴ   ʋ ɹ ɻ ɰ   ʙ ⱱ ʀ ɾ ɽ   ɫ ɬ ɮ ɺ ɭ ʎ ʟ   ɥ ʍ ɧ   ʼ   ɓ ɗ ʄ ɠ ʛ   ʘ ǀ ǃ ǂ ǁ   ɨ ʉ ɯ   ɪ ʏ ʊ   ø ɘ ɵ ɤ   ə ɚ   ɛ œ ɜ ɝ ɞ ʌ ɔ   æ   ɐ ɶ ɑ ɒ   ʰ ʱ ʷ ʲ ˠ ˤ ⁿ ˡ   ˈ ˌ ː ˑ ̪   {{IPA|}}

Wikidata entities used in this page

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

This page is a member of 8 hidden categories (help):


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campus_sexual_assault"







Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki