Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 

















Editing Campus sexual assault

















Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 
















Appearance
   

 










You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log inorcreate an account, your edits will be attributed to a username, among other benefits.

 Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.


Latest revision Your text
Line 14: Line 14:

There is currently no evidence that women who attend college are at a higher risk of being sexually assaulted than women of the same age who do not attend college.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Muehlenhard |first1=Charlene L. |last2=Peterson |first2=Zoe D. |last3=Humphreys |first3=Terry P. |last4=Jozkowski |first4=Kristen N. |title=Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women's Risk of Sexual Assault While in College |journal=The Journal of Sex Research |date=16 May 2017 |volume=54 |issue=4 |doi=10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014 |pmid=28375675 |page=565|s2cid=3853369 |quote=As discussed, evidence does not support the assumption that college students experience more sexual assault than nonstudents}}</ref> A review of the published research in 2017 found that about 1 in 5 women was "a reasonably accurate average across women and campuses" for the percentage of women who are sexually assaulted during their time in college.<ref name="1in5_2017">{{cite journal |last1=Muehlenhard |first1=Charlene L. |last2=Peterson |first2=Zoe D. |last3=Humphreys |first3=Terry P. |last4=Jozkowski |first4=Kristen N. |title=Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women's Risk of Sexual Assault While in College |journal=The Journal of Sex Research |date=16 May 2017 |volume=54 |issue=4 |doi=10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014 |pmid=28375675 |pages=549–576|s2cid=3853369 }}</ref>

There is currently no evidence that women who attend college are at a higher risk of being sexually assaulted than women of the same age who do not attend college.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Muehlenhard |first1=Charlene L. |last2=Peterson |first2=Zoe D. |last3=Humphreys |first3=Terry P. |last4=Jozkowski |first4=Kristen N. |title=Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women's Risk of Sexual Assault While in College |journal=The Journal of Sex Research |date=16 May 2017 |volume=54 |issue=4 |doi=10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014 |pmid=28375675 |page=565|s2cid=3853369 |quote=As discussed, evidence does not support the assumption that college students experience more sexual assault than nonstudents}}</ref> A review of the published research in 2017 found that about 1 in 5 women was "a reasonably accurate average across women and campuses" for the percentage of women who are sexually assaulted during their time in college.<ref name="1in5_2017">{{cite journal |last1=Muehlenhard |first1=Charlene L. |last2=Peterson |first2=Zoe D. |last3=Humphreys |first3=Terry P. |last4=Jozkowski |first4=Kristen N. |title=Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women's Risk of Sexual Assault While in College |journal=The Journal of Sex Research |date=16 May 2017 |volume=54 |issue=4 |doi=10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014 |pmid=28375675 |pages=549–576|s2cid=3853369 }}</ref>



Studies that have examined sexual assault experiences among college students in western countries other than the U.S. have found results similar to those found by American researchers. A 1993 study of a nationally representative sample of Canadian College students found that 28% of women had experienced some form of sexual assault in the preceding year, and 45% of women had experienced some form of sexual assault since entering college.<ref name=DeKeseredy>{{cite journal | last1 = DeKeseredy | first1 = Walter | last2 = Kelly| first2 = Katharine | title = The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Canadian university and college dating relationships | journal = [[Canadian Journal of Sociology]] | volume = 18 | issue = 2 | pages = 137–159 | jstor = 3341255 | doi = 10.2307/3341255 | date = 1993 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.457.8310 }}</ref> A 1991 study of 347 undergraduates in New Zealand found that 25.3% had experienced rape or attempted rape, and 51.6% had experienced some form of sexual victimization.<ref name=Gavey_new_zealand>{{cite journal | last = Gavey | author-link1=Nicola Gavey|first = Nicola | title = Sexual victimization prevalence among New Zealand university students | journal = [[Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology]] | volume = 59 | issue = 3 | pages = 464–466 | doi = 10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.464 | date = June 1991 | pmid=2071732}}</ref> A 2011 study of students in the United Kingdom found that 25% of women had experienced some type of sexual assault while attending university and 7% of women had experienced rape or attempted rape as college students.<ref name=NUS_britain>{{cite book | last = NUS | author-link = National Union of Students (United Kingdom) | title = Hidden Marks: A study of women student's experiences of harassment, stalking, violence, and sexual assault | url = http://www.nus.org.uk/Global/NUS_hidden_marks_report_2nd_edition_web.pdf | publisher = [[National Union of Students (United Kingdom)|National Union of Students]] | location = London, UK | date = 2011 | edition = 2nd | access-date = 10 January 2015 | archive-date = 17 September 2019 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190917054416/https://www.nus.org.uk/Global/NUS_hidden_marks_report_2nd_edition_web.pdf | url-status = dead }}</ref>

Studies that have examined sexual assault experiences among college students in western countries other than the U.S. have found results similar to those found by American researchers. A 1993 study of a nationally representative sample of Canadian College students found that 28% of women had experienced some form of sexual assault in the preceding year, and 45% of women had experienced some form of sexual assault since entering college.<ref name=DeKeseredy>{{cite journal | last1 = DeKeseredy | first1 = Walter | last2 = Kelly| first2 = Katharine | title = The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Canadian university and college dating relationships | journal = [[Canadian Journal of Sociology]] | volume = 18 | issue = 2 | pages = 137–159 | jstor = 3341255 | doi = 10.2307/3341255 | date = 1993 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.457.8310 }}</ref> A 1991 study of 347 undergraduates in New Zealand found that 25.3% had experienced rape or attempted rape, and 51.6% had experienced some form of sexual victimization.<ref name=Gavey_new_zealand>{{cite journal | last = Gavey | author-link1=Nicola Gavey|first = Nicola | title = Sexual victimization prevalence among New Zealand university students | journal = [[Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology]] | volume = 59 | issue = 3 | pages = 464–466 | doi = 10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.464 | date = June 1991 | pmid=2071732}}</ref> A 2011 study of students in the United Kingdom found that 25% of women had experienced some type of sexual assault while attending university and 7% of women had experienced rape or attempted rape as college students.<ref name=NUS_britain>{{cite book | last = NUS | author-link = National Union of Students (United Kingdom) |title=Hidden Marks: A study of women student's experiences of harassment, stalking, violence, and sexual assault | url = http://www.nus.org.uk/Global/NUS_hidden_marks_report_2nd_edition_web.pdf | publisher = [[National Union of Students (United Kingdom)|National Union of Students]] | location = London, UK | date = 2011| edition = 2nd |access-date=10 January 2015}}</ref>



===Reporting===

===Reporting===

Line 166: Line 166:

The Department of Education's approach toward adjudicating sexual assault accusations has been criticized for failing to consider the possibility of false accusations, mistaken identity, or errors by investigators. Critics claim that the "preponderance of the evidence" standard required by Title IX is not an appropriate basis for determining guilt or innocence, and can lead to students being wrongfully expelled. Campus hearings have also been criticized for failing to provide many of the due process protections that the United States Constitution guarantees in criminal trials, such as the right to be represented by an attorney and the right to cross-examine witnesses.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/02/12/disagreement-campus-judicial-systems|last=Grasgreen|first=Allie|title=Classrooms, Courts or Neither?|date=12 February 2014|website=Inside Higher Ed}}Other Sources:

The Department of Education's approach toward adjudicating sexual assault accusations has been criticized for failing to consider the possibility of false accusations, mistaken identity, or errors by investigators. Critics claim that the "preponderance of the evidence" standard required by Title IX is not an appropriate basis for determining guilt or innocence, and can lead to students being wrongfully expelled. Campus hearings have also been criticized for failing to provide many of the due process protections that the United States Constitution guarantees in criminal trials, such as the right to be represented by an attorney and the right to cross-examine witnesses.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/02/12/disagreement-campus-judicial-systems|last=Grasgreen|first=Allie|title=Classrooms, Courts or Neither?|date=12 February 2014|website=Inside Higher Ed}}Other Sources:

*{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303615304579157900127017212|last=Taranto|first=James|title=An Education in College Justice|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=6 December 2013}}

*{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303615304579157900127017212|last=Taranto|first=James|title=An Education in College Justice|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=6 December 2013}}

*{{cite journal|url=http://www.phillymag.com/articles/the-new-rules-of-college-sex|last=Hingston|first=Sandy|title=The New Rules of College Sex|journal=Philadelphia|date=22 August 2011|access-date=10 May 2014|archive-date=7 July 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140707110154/http://www.phillymag.com/articles/the-new-rules-of-college-sex/|url-status=dead}}

*{{cite journal|url=http://www.phillymag.com/articles/the-new-rules-of-college-sex|last=Hingston|first=Sandy|title=The New Rules of College Sex|journal=Philadelphia|date=22 August 2011}}

*{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510|last=Grossman|first=Judith|title=A Mother, a Feminist, Aghast|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=16 April 2013}}

*{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510|last=Grossman|first=Judith|title=A Mother, a Feminist, Aghast|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|date=16 April 2013}}

*{{cite web|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/28/on_college_campuses_a_presumption_of_guilt.html|last=Berkowitz|first=Peter|title=On College Campuses, a Presumption of Guilt|website=Real Clear Politics|date=28 February 2014}}

*{{cite web|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/02/28/on_college_campuses_a_presumption_of_guilt.html|last=Berkowitz|first=Peter|title=On College Campuses, a Presumption of Guilt|website=Real Clear Politics|date=28 February 2014}}

Line 174: Line 174:

The [[Foundation for Individual Rights in Education]] (FIRE) has been critical of university definitions of consent that it considers overly broad. In 2011, FIRE criticized [[Stanford University]] after it held a male student responsible for a sexual assault for an incident where both parties had been drinking. FIRE said that Stanford's definition of consent, quoted as follows "A person is legally incapable of giving consent if under age 18 years; if intoxicated by drugs and/or alcohol;", was so broad that sexual contact at any level of intoxication could be considered non-consensual.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Post Staff|title=The feds' mad assault on campus sex|url=https://nypost.com/2011/07/20/the-feds-mad-assault-on-campus-sex/#ixzz1SlVnjvdt|access-date=22 July 2015|work=[[The New York Post]]|date=20 July 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Taranto|first1=James|title=Drunkenness and Double Standards|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304558804579374844067975558|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=24 July 2015|date=10 February 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Admin|title=Stanford Trains Student Jurors That 'Acting Persuasive and Logical' is Sign of Guilt; Story of Student Judicial Nightmare in Today's 'New York Post'|url=https://www.thefire.org/stanford-trains-student-jurors-that-acting-persuasive-and-logical-is-sign-of-guilt-story-of-student-judicial-nightmare-in-todays-new-york-post-2/|website=TheFire.org|access-date=22 July 2015|date=20 June 2014}}</ref> Writing for ''[[The Atlantic]]'' magazine, [[Conor Friedersdorf]] noted that a Stanford male who alleges he was sexually assaulted in 2015 and was advised against reporting it by on-campus sexual assault services, could have been subjected to a counterclaim based on Stanford policy by his female attacker who was drunk at the time.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Friedersdorf|first1=Conor|title=On a Stanford Man Who Alleged a Sexual Assault|website=[[The Atlantic]]|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/on-the-stanford-man-who-alleged-sexual-assault/384853/|access-date=24 July 2015|date=28 January 2015}}</ref> FIRE was also critical of a poster at [[Coastal Carolina University]], which stated that sex is only consensual if both parties are completely sober and if consent is not only present, but also enthusiastic. The FIRE argued that this standard converted ordinary lawful sexual encounters into sexual assault even while drinking is very common at most institutions.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Schow|first1=Ashe|title=Ever had drunk sex? That's rape, according to this university|url=http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ever-had-drunk-sex-thats-rape-according-to-this-university/article/2568742|access-date=24 July 2015|date=22 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Soave|first1=Robby|title=Coastal Carolina University Thinks All Drunk Sex Is Rape: Requires Sobriety, Enthusiasm|url=http://reason.com/blog/2015/07/21/coastal-carolina-university-thinks-all-d|access-date=24 July 2015|date=21 July 2015}}</ref>

The [[Foundation for Individual Rights in Education]] (FIRE) has been critical of university definitions of consent that it considers overly broad. In 2011, FIRE criticized [[Stanford University]] after it held a male student responsible for a sexual assault for an incident where both parties had been drinking. FIRE said that Stanford's definition of consent, quoted as follows "A person is legally incapable of giving consent if under age 18 years; if intoxicated by drugs and/or alcohol;", was so broad that sexual contact at any level of intoxication could be considered non-consensual.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Post Staff|title=The feds' mad assault on campus sex|url=https://nypost.com/2011/07/20/the-feds-mad-assault-on-campus-sex/#ixzz1SlVnjvdt|access-date=22 July 2015|work=[[The New York Post]]|date=20 July 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Taranto|first1=James|title=Drunkenness and Double Standards|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304558804579374844067975558|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=24 July 2015|date=10 February 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Admin|title=Stanford Trains Student Jurors That 'Acting Persuasive and Logical' is Sign of Guilt; Story of Student Judicial Nightmare in Today's 'New York Post'|url=https://www.thefire.org/stanford-trains-student-jurors-that-acting-persuasive-and-logical-is-sign-of-guilt-story-of-student-judicial-nightmare-in-todays-new-york-post-2/|website=TheFire.org|access-date=22 July 2015|date=20 June 2014}}</ref> Writing for ''[[The Atlantic]]'' magazine, [[Conor Friedersdorf]] noted that a Stanford male who alleges he was sexually assaulted in 2015 and was advised against reporting it by on-campus sexual assault services, could have been subjected to a counterclaim based on Stanford policy by his female attacker who was drunk at the time.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Friedersdorf|first1=Conor|title=On a Stanford Man Who Alleged a Sexual Assault|website=[[The Atlantic]]|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/on-the-stanford-man-who-alleged-sexual-assault/384853/|access-date=24 July 2015|date=28 January 2015}}</ref> FIRE was also critical of a poster at [[Coastal Carolina University]], which stated that sex is only consensual if both parties are completely sober and if consent is not only present, but also enthusiastic. The FIRE argued that this standard converted ordinary lawful sexual encounters into sexual assault even while drinking is very common at most institutions.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Schow|first1=Ashe|title=Ever had drunk sex? That's rape, according to this university|url=http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ever-had-drunk-sex-thats-rape-according-to-this-university/article/2568742|access-date=24 July 2015|date=22 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Soave|first1=Robby|title=Coastal Carolina University Thinks All Drunk Sex Is Rape: Requires Sobriety, Enthusiasm|url=http://reason.com/blog/2015/07/21/coastal-carolina-university-thinks-all-d|access-date=24 July 2015|date=21 July 2015}}</ref>



In May 2014, the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, a law firm that advises colleges on liability issues, issued an open letter to all parties involved in the issue of rape on campus.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncherm.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/An-Open-Letter-from-The-NCHERM-Group.pdf|last=Sokolow|first=Brett A.|title=An Open Letter to Higher Education about Sexual Violence from Brett A. Sokolow, Esq. and The NCHERM Group Partners|publisher=The NCHERM Group, LLC|date=27 May 2014|access-date=24 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140602095539/http://www.ncherm.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/An-Open-Letter-from-The-NCHERM-Group.pdf|archive-date=2 June 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> In it, NCHERM expressed praise for Obama's initiatives to end sexual assault on college campuses, and called attention to several areas of concern they hoped to help address. While acknowledging appreciation for the complexities involved in changing campus culture, the letter offered direct advice to each party involved in campus hearings, outlining the improvements NCHERM considers necessary to continue the progress achieved since the issuance of the "Dear Colleague" letter in 2011. In early 2014, the group [[RAINN]] (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network) wrote an open letter to the White House calling for campus hearings to be de-emphasized due to their lack of accountability for survivors and victims of sexual violence. According to RAINN, "The crime of rape does not fit the capabilities of such boards. They often offer the worst of both worlds: they lack protections for the accused while often tormenting victims."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rainn.org/news-room/rainn-urges-white-house-task-force-to-overhaul-colleges-treatment-of-rape|title=RAINN Urges White House Task Force to Overhaul Colleges' Treatment of Rape|publisher=Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network|date=6 March 2014|access-date=10 May 2014|archive-date=6 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160606043335/https://rainn.org/news-room/rainn-urges-white-house-task-force-to-overhaul-colleges-treatment-of-rape|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In May 2014, the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, a law firm that advises colleges on liability issues, issued an open letter to all parties involved in the issue of rape on campus.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncherm.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/An-Open-Letter-from-The-NCHERM-Group.pdf|last=Sokolow|first=Brett A.|title=An Open Letter to Higher Education about Sexual Violence from Brett A. Sokolow, Esq. and The NCHERM Group Partners|publisher=The NCHERM Group, LLC|date=27 May 2014|access-date=24 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140602095539/http://www.ncherm.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/An-Open-Letter-from-The-NCHERM-Group.pdf|archive-date=2 June 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> In it, NCHERM expressed praise for Obama's initiatives to end sexual assault on college campuses, and called attention to several areas of concern they hoped to help address. While acknowledging appreciation for the complexities involved in changing campus culture, the letter offered direct advice to each party involved in campus hearings, outlining the improvements NCHERM considers necessary to continue the progress achieved since the issuance of the "Dear Colleague" letter in 2011. In early 2014, the group [[RAINN]] (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network) wrote an open letter to the White House calling for campus hearings to be de-emphasized due to their lack of accountability for survivors and victims of sexual violence. According to RAINN, "The crime of rape does not fit the capabilities of such boards. They often offer the worst of both worlds: they lack protections for the accused while often tormenting victims."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rainn.org/news-room/rainn-urges-white-house-task-force-to-overhaul-colleges-treatment-of-rape|title=RAINN Urges White House Task Force to Overhaul Colleges' Treatment of Rape|publisher=Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network|date=6 March 2014}}</ref>



Many institutions today are facing Title IX investigations due to the alleged lack of response on their campus to sexual assault. New policies by colleges have spawned "a cottage industry" of experts to address sexual assault on their campuses. "The Federal Education Department urges colleges to make sure their discipline policies do not discourage students from coming forward to report sexual assaults."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/us/rape-victims-brigham-young-university-honor-code-suspensions.html?_r=0|title=At Brigham Young, a Cost in Reporting a Rape|last=Healy|first=Jack|date=26 April 2016|work=The New York Times}}</ref> Colleges need to be away of their policies in order to not [[victim blame]] their students and provide them with the adequate support that is need for the student. Many campuses are facing the same challenges on how to address the problem of sexual assault and are taking measures to do so, by hiring teams for addressing Title IX complaints.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/us/colleges-beef-up-bureaucracies-to-deal-with-sexual-misconduct.html|title=Colleges Spending Millions to Deal with Sexual Misconduct Complaints|last=Hartocollis|first=Anemona|date=29 March 2016|work=The New York Times}}</ref>

Many institutions today are facing Title IX investigations due to the alleged lack of response on their campus to sexual assault. New policies by colleges have spawned "a cottage industry" of experts to address sexual assault on their campuses. "The Federal Education Department urges colleges to make sure their discipline policies do not discourage students from coming forward to report sexual assaults."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/us/rape-victims-brigham-young-university-honor-code-suspensions.html?_r=0|title=At Brigham Young, a Cost in Reporting a Rape|last=Healy|first=Jack|date=26 April 2016|work=The New York Times}}</ref> Colleges need to be away of their policies in order to not [[victim blame]] their students and provide them with the adequate support that is need for the student. Many campuses are facing the same challenges on how to address the problem of sexual assault and are taking measures to do so, by hiring teams for addressing Title IX complaints.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/us/colleges-beef-up-bureaucracies-to-deal-with-sexual-misconduct.html|title=Colleges Spending Millions to Deal with Sexual Misconduct Complaints|last=Hartocollis|first=Anemona|date=29 March 2016|work=The New York Times}}</ref>

Line 187: Line 187:

Since the issuance of the "Dear Colleague" letter, a number of lawsuits have been filed against colleges and universities by male students alleging that their universities violated their rights over the course of adjudicating sexual assault accusations.<ref name = "Schow">Schow, Ashe, "[http://washingtonexaminer.com/backlash-college-men-challenge-guilty-until-proven-innocent-standard-for-sex-assault-cases/article/2551863 Backlash: College men challenge 'guilty until proven innocent' standard for sex assault cases]", ''[[Washington Examiner]]'', 11 August 2014 | Other Sources:

Since the issuance of the "Dear Colleague" letter, a number of lawsuits have been filed against colleges and universities by male students alleging that their universities violated their rights over the course of adjudicating sexual assault accusations.<ref name = "Schow">Schow, Ashe, "[http://washingtonexaminer.com/backlash-college-men-challenge-guilty-until-proven-innocent-standard-for-sex-assault-cases/article/2551863 Backlash: College men challenge 'guilty until proven innocent' standard for sex assault cases]", ''[[Washington Examiner]]'', 11 August 2014 | Other Sources:

*{{cite journal|url=http://www.phillymag.com/news/2014/02/11/expelled-swarthmore-student-sues-college-sexual-assault-allegations|last=Van Zuylen-Wood|first=Simon|title=Expelled Swarthmore Student Sues College Over Sexual Assault Allegations|journal=Philadelphia|date=11 February 2014}}

*{{cite journal|url=http://www.phillymag.com/news/2014/02/11/expelled-swarthmore-student-sues-college-sexual-assault-allegations|last=Van Zuylen-Wood|first=Simon|title=Expelled Swarthmore Student Sues College Over Sexual Assault Allegations|journal=Philadelphia|date=11 February 2014}}

*{{cite news|url=http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20131217/NEWS01/312170088/DSU-student-who-cleared-rape-charges-sues-school|last=Parra|first=Esteban|title=DSU student who was cleared of rape charges sues school|newspaper=The News Journal|date=17 December 2013|access-date=10 May 2014|archive-date=23 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923223532/http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20131217/NEWS01/312170088/DSU-student-who-cleared-rape-charges-sues-school|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Xavier University]] entered into a settlement in one such lawsuit in April 2014.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://bigstory.ap.org/article/basketball-star-wells-settles-suit-against-xavier|last=Myers|first=Amanda Lee|title=Basketball star Wells settles suit against Xavier|agency=Associated Press|date=24 April 2014}}</ref>

*{{cite news|url=http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20131217/NEWS01/312170088/DSU-student-who-cleared-rape-charges-sues-school|last=Parra|first=Esteban|title=DSU student who was cleared of rape charges sues school|newspaper=The News Journal|date=17 December 2013}}</ref> [[Xavier University]] entered into a settlement in one such lawsuit in April 2014.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://bigstory.ap.org/article/basketball-star-wells-settles-suit-against-xavier|last=Myers|first=Amanda Lee|title=Basketball star Wells settles suit against Xavier|agency=Associated Press|date=24 April 2014}}</ref>



Other examples include:

Other examples include:

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Copy and paste: – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · §   Cite your sources: <ref></ref>


{{}}   {{{}}}   |   []   [[]]   [[Category:]]   #REDIRECT [[]]   &nbsp;   <s></s>   <sup></sup>   <sub></sub>   <code></code>   <pre></pre>   <blockquote></blockquote>   <ref></ref> <ref name="" />   {{Reflist}}   <references />   <includeonly></includeonly>   <noinclude></noinclude>   {{DEFAULTSORT:}}   <nowiki></nowiki>   <!-- -->   <span class="plainlinks"></span>


Symbols: ~ | ¡ ¿ † ‡ ↔ ↑ ↓ • ¶   # ∞   ‹› «»   ¤ ₳ ฿ ₵ ¢ ₡ ₢ $ ₫ ₯ € ₠ ₣ ƒ ₴ ₭ ₤ ℳ ₥ ₦ № ₧ ₰ £ ៛ ₨ ₪ ৳ ₮ ₩ ¥   ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦   𝄫 ♭ ♮ ♯ 𝄪   © ® ™
Latin: A a Á á À à  â Ä ä Ǎ ǎ Ă ă Ā ā à ã Å å Ą ą Æ æ Ǣ ǣ   B b   C c Ć ć Ċ ċ Ĉ ĉ Č č Ç ç   D d Ď ď Đ đ Ḍ ḍ Ð ð   E e É é È è Ė ė Ê ê Ë ë Ě ě Ĕ ĕ Ē ē Ẽ ẽ Ę ę Ẹ ẹ Ɛ ɛ Ǝ ǝ Ə ə   F f   G g Ġ ġ Ĝ ĝ Ğ ğ Ģ ģ   H h Ĥ ĥ Ħ ħ Ḥ ḥ   I i İ ı Í í Ì ì Î î Ï ï Ǐ ǐ Ĭ ĭ Ī ī Ĩ ĩ Į į Ị ị   J j Ĵ ĵ   K k Ķ ķ   L l Ĺ ĺ Ŀ ŀ Ľ ľ Ļ ļ Ł ł Ḷ ḷ Ḹ ḹ   M m Ṃ ṃ   N n Ń ń Ň ň Ñ ñ Ņ ņ Ṇ ṇ Ŋ ŋ   O o Ó ó Ò ò Ô ô Ö ö Ǒ ǒ Ŏ ŏ Ō ō Õ õ Ǫ ǫ Ọ ọ Ő ő Ø ø Œ œ   Ɔ ɔ   P p   Q q   R r Ŕ ŕ Ř ř Ŗ ŗ Ṛ ṛ Ṝ ṝ   S s Ś ś Ŝ ŝ Š š Ş ş Ș ș Ṣ ṣ ß   T t Ť ť Ţ ţ Ț ț Ṭ ṭ Þ þ   U u Ú ú Ù ù Û û Ü ü Ǔ ǔ Ŭ ŭ Ū ū Ũ ũ Ů ů Ų ų Ụ ụ Ű ű Ǘ ǘ Ǜ ǜ Ǚ ǚ Ǖ ǖ   V v   W w Ŵ ŵ   X x   Y y Ý ý Ŷ ŷ Ÿ ÿ Ỹ ỹ Ȳ ȳ   Z z Ź ź Ż ż Ž ž   ß Ð ð Þ þ Ŋ ŋ Ə ə
Greek: Ά ά Έ έ Ή ή Ί ί Ό ό Ύ ύ Ώ ώ   Α α Β β Γ γ Δ δ   Ε ε Ζ ζ Η η Θ θ   Ι ι Κ κ Λ λ Μ μ   Ν ν Ξ ξ Ο ο Π π   Ρ ρ Σ σ ς Τ τ Υ υ   Φ φ Χ χ Ψ ψ Ω ω   {{Polytonic|}}
Cyrillic: А а Б б В в Г г   Ґ ґ Ѓ ѓ Д д Ђ ђ   Е е Ё ё Є є Ж ж   З з Ѕ ѕ И и І і   Ї ї Й й Ј ј К к   Ќ ќ Л л Љ љ М м   Н н Њ њ О о П п   Р р С с Т т Ћ ћ   У у Ў ў Ф ф Х х   Ц ц Ч ч Џ џ Ш ш   Щ щ Ъ ъ Ы ы Ь ь   Э э Ю ю Я я   ́
IPA: t̪ d̪ ʈ ɖ ɟ ɡ ɢ ʡ ʔ   ɸ β θ ð ʃ ʒ ɕ ʑ ʂ ʐ ç ʝ ɣ χ ʁ ħ ʕ ʜ ʢ ɦ   ɱ ɳ ɲ ŋ ɴ   ʋ ɹ ɻ ɰ   ʙ ⱱ ʀ ɾ ɽ   ɫ ɬ ɮ ɺ ɭ ʎ ʟ   ɥ ʍ ɧ   ʼ   ɓ ɗ ʄ ɠ ʛ   ʘ ǀ ǃ ǂ ǁ   ɨ ʉ ɯ   ɪ ʏ ʊ   ø ɘ ɵ ɤ   ə ɚ   ɛ œ ɜ ɝ ɞ ʌ ɔ   æ   ɐ ɶ ɑ ɒ   ʰ ʱ ʷ ʲ ˠ ˤ ⁿ ˡ   ˈ ˌ ː ˑ ̪   {{IPA|}}

Wikidata entities used in this page

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

This page is a member of 8 hidden categories (help):


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campus_sexual_assault"







Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki