add
Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
|
No edit summary
|
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Infobox language family |
{{Infobox language family |
||
| name = Continental Celtic |
| name = Continental Celtic |
||
| acceptance = geographic |
|||
| region = Continental Europe, Anatolia |
| region = Continental Europe, Anatolia |
||
| familycolor = Indo-European |
| familycolor = Indo-European |
||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
| mapcaption = Celtic languages during the Iron Age and classical Antiquity. 1: early Iron Age core region (Hallstatt -H-, early La Tène -L-) 2: assumed Celtic expansion by the 4th century BC L: La Tène site H: Hallstatt site I: Iberia B: British Isles G: Galatia, settled in the 3rd century BC (after 279 BC) |
| mapcaption = Celtic languages during the Iron Age and classical Antiquity. 1: early Iron Age core region (Hallstatt -H-, early La Tène -L-) 2: assumed Celtic expansion by the 4th century BC L: La Tène site H: Hallstatt site I: Iberia B: British Isles G: Galatia, settled in the 3rd century BC (after 279 BC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
[[File:Celtic languages.png|thumb|280px|The tentative Celtic clade, consisting of the proto- language and all the known daughter languages. It is tentative because other languages might be found.]] |
|||
⚫ |
The '''Continental Celtic languages''' are the now-extinct group of the [[Celtic languages]] that were spoken on the continent of Europe and in central [[Anatolia]], as distinguished from the [[Insular Celtic languages]] of the [[British Isles]] and [[Brittany]]. |
||
⚫ | The '''Continental Celtic languages''' are the now-extinct group of the [[Celtic languages]] that were spoken on the continent of Europe and in central [[Anatolia]], as distinguished from the [[Insular Celtic languages]] of the [[British Isles]] and [[Brittany]]. ''Continental Celtic'' is a geographic, rather than linguistic, grouping of the ancient Celtic languages. |
||
Not all the branches, however, are known. There are alternative hypotheses of the exact paths between known branches. For this reason, the late linguist, [[Calvert Watkins]], omits the upper branch lines between Proto-Indo-European and the various major daughter groups in his circular presentation of the tree on the rear fly leaves of the Fourth and other editions of the ''American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'', containing his essay "Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans" and his appendix on Indo-European roots. There are in that edition 15 major groups, some containing only one language. Theorists can connect these major branches according to their groupings. |
|||
⚫ | These languages were spoken by the people known to Roman and Greek writers as the ''Keltoi'', ''Celtae'', ''Galli'', and ''Galatae''.{{citation needed|reason=evidence required for the Greek/Roman names for the peoples|date=June 2021}} They were spoken in an area arcing from the northern half of [[Iberian Peninsula|Iberia]] in the west to north of [[Belgium]], and east to the [[Carpathian basin]] and the [[Balkans]] as [[Noric language|Noric]], and in inner Anatolia (modern day Turkey) as [[Galatian language|Galatian]]. |
||
== The insular and continental branches == |
|||
The branch labelled Celtic is divided into Insular and Continental. As they are branches, and not random groups, it is important to understand what that terminology means. |
|||
Suppose that over time a population P speaking a language L varies its speech so that in place of one population speaking one language are now two populations, P1 and P2, speaking two languages, L1 and L1. The latter are called [[sister language]]s, while L is depending on the speaker's preference a mother language, a parent language, an ancestor language, or a [[proto-language]]. L1 and L2 are daughter languages. Obviously any daughter language can itself be a proto-language, so that over time the degree of branching can become very great, as in [[Ethnologue]]'s language trees.<ref>For example, their tree for Indo-European contains 454 languages as of this date of access: {{cite web | title=Indo-European | publisher=Ethnologue | url=https://www.ethnologue.com/subgroup/3/ | access-date=6 April 2024}}</ref> They might also be very ornate and artistic.<ref>{{cite web | title=Old World Language Families | publisher=TOPPAN | url=https://toppandigital.com/us/blog-us/the-best-language-infographics-interactive-tools-on-the-web/ | access-date=6 April 2006}}</ref> |
|||
== Questions and answers of classification == |
|||
===The double classification of Celtic=== |
|||
<!--''Continental Celtic'' is a geographic, rather than linguistic, grouping of the ancient Celtic languages.--> |
|||
⚫ | The modern term ''Continental Celtic'' is used in contrast to ''[[Insular Celtic languages|Insular Celtic]]''. However, while many researchers agree with the ''Insular Celtic'' hypothesis that the Insular Celtic languages constitute a linguistically distinct branch of Celtic (Cowgill 1975; McCone 1991, 1992; Schrijver 1995) that has undergone common [[linguistics|linguistic]] innovations, there is no evidence that the ''Continental Celtic'' languages can be similarly grouped. Instead, the group called ''Continental Celtic'' is [[paraphyletic]]; the term refers simply to non-Insular Celtic languages and not to any special linguistic relationship between them as a group other than they are Celtic. Since little material has been preserved of any of the Continental Celtic languages, [[historical linguistics|historical linguistic]] analysis based on the [[comparative method]] is difficult to perform. Meanwhile, under the P/Q hypothesis, other researchers see the Brittonic languages and Gaulish as forming part of a subgroup of the Celtic languages that is known as [[P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages|P-Celtic]].{{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=17}} Under this hypothesis, Continental languages are P-Celtic except for Celtiberian and Gallaecian, which are Q-Celtic. The Continental Celtic languages have had a definite influence on all of the [[Romance languages]]. |
||
Even though [[Breton language|Breton]] has been spoken in [[Continental Europe]] since at least the 6th century AD, it is not considered one of the Continental Celtic languages, as it is a [[Brittonic languages|Brittonic language]], like [[Cornish language|Cornish]] and [[Welsh language|Welsh]]. A Gaulish substratum in Breton has been suggested, but that is debated. |
Even though [[Breton language|Breton]] has been spoken in [[Continental Europe]] since at least the 6th century AD, it is not considered one of the Continental Celtic languages, as it is a [[Brittonic languages|Brittonic language]], like [[Cornish language|Cornish]] and [[Welsh language|Welsh]]. A Gaulish substratum in Breton has been suggested, but that is debated. |
||
⚫ | |||
===Eliminating the doubt with hearsay and conjecture=== |
|||
⚫ | It is likely that [[Celts]] spoke dozens of different languages and [[dialects]] across Europe in pre-[[Roman Empire|Roman]] times, but only a small number are [[attested language|attested]]: |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | These languages were spoken by the people known to Roman and Greek writers as the ''Keltoi'', ''Celtae'', ''Galli'', and ''Galatae''.{{citation needed|reason=evidence required for the Greek/Roman names for the peoples|date=June 2021}} They were spoken in an area arcing from the northern half of [[Iberian Peninsula|Iberia]] in the west to north of [[Belgium]], and east to the [[Carpathian basin]] and the [[Balkans]] as [[Noric language|Noric]], and in inner Anatolia (modern day Turkey) as [[Galatian language|Galatian]]. |
||
⚫ |
It is likely that [[Celts]] spoke dozens of different languages and [[dialects]] across Europe in pre-[[Roman Empire|Roman]] times, but only a small number are |
||
* '''[[Lepontic language|Lepontic]]''' (6th to 4th century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was spoken on the southern side of the Alps. It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names. |
* '''[[Lepontic language|Lepontic]]''' (6th to 4th century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was spoken on the southern side of the Alps. It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names. |
||
* '''[[Gaulish]]''' (3rd century BC to 5th (?) century AD){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was the main language spoken in greater [[Gaul]]. This is often considered to be divided into two dialects, [[Cisalpine Gaulish|Cisalpine]] (spoken in what is now Italy) and [[Gaulish|Transalpine]] (spoken in what is now France). It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names and tribal names in writings of classical authors. It may have been a [[Stratum (linguistics)#Substratum|substratum]] to Breton (see below). |
* '''[[Gaulish]]''' (3rd century BC to 5th (?) century AD){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was the main language spoken in greater [[Gaul]]. This is often considered to be divided into two dialects, [[Cisalpine Gaulish|Cisalpine]] (spoken in what is now Italy) and [[Gaulish|Transalpine]] (spoken in what is now France). It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names and tribal names in writings of classical authors. It may have been a [[Stratum (linguistics)#Substratum|substratum]] to Breton (see below). |
||
Line 47: | Line 33: | ||
* '''[[Celtiberian language|Celtiberian]]''' or '''Northeastern Hispano-Celtic''' (3rd to 1st century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} is the name given to the language in northeast Iberia, between the headwaters of the [[Douro]], [[Tagus]], [[Júcar]] and [[Turía (river)|Turía]] rivers and the [[Ebro]] river. It is attested in some 200 inscriptions as well as place names. It is distinct from [[Iberian language|Iberian]]. |
* '''[[Celtiberian language|Celtiberian]]''' or '''Northeastern Hispano-Celtic''' (3rd to 1st century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} is the name given to the language in northeast Iberia, between the headwaters of the [[Douro]], [[Tagus]], [[Júcar]] and [[Turía (river)|Turía]] rivers and the [[Ebro]] river. It is attested in some 200 inscriptions as well as place names. It is distinct from [[Iberian language|Iberian]]. |
||
* '''[[Gallaecian language|Gallaecian]]''' also called '''Gallaic''' or '''Northwestern Hispano-Celtic''', attested in a set (corpus) of Latin inscriptions containing isolated words and sentences that are unmistakably Celtic.<ref>{{cite book|quote=In the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, and more specifically between the west and north Atlantic coasts and an imaginary line running north-south and linking Oviedo and Merida, there is a corpus of Latin inscriptions with particular characteristics of its own. This corpus contains some linguistic features that are clearly Celtic and others that in our opinion are not Celtic. The former we shall group, for the moment, under the label northwestern Hispano-Celtic. The latter are the same features found in well-documented contemporary inscriptions in the region occupied by the Lusitanians, and therefore belonging to the variety known as LUSITANIAN, or more broadly as GALLO-LUSITANIAN. As we have already said, we do not consider this variety to belong to the Celtic language family. |first=Jordán |last=Colera |date=2007 |pages=750}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Prósper |first=B.M. |date=2005 |chapter=Estudios sobre la fonética y la morfología de la lengua celtibérica |language=es |trans-chapter=Studies on the phonetics and morphology of the Celtiberian language |title=Vascos, celtas e indoeuropeos. Genes y lenguas |trans-title=Basques, Celts and Indo-Europeans. Genes and languages |editor1-last=Villar Liebana |editor1-first=Francisco |editor1-link=Francisco Villar Liebana |editor2-last=Prósper |editor2-first=B.M. |publisher=Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca |pages=333–350 |isbn=84-7800-530-7}}</ref> It was spoken in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula comprising today's Spanish regions of [[Galicia (Spain)|Galicia]], western [[Asturias]] and western [[Castile and León]], and the [[Norte Region, Portugal|Norte Region]] in northern Portugal. |
* '''[[Gallaecian language|Gallaecian]]''' also called '''Gallaic''' or '''Northwestern Hispano-Celtic''', attested in a set (corpus) of Latin inscriptions containing isolated words and sentences that are unmistakably Celtic.<ref>{{cite book|quote=In the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, and more specifically between the west and north Atlantic coasts and an imaginary line running north-south and linking Oviedo and Merida, there is a corpus of Latin inscriptions with particular characteristics of its own. This corpus contains some linguistic features that are clearly Celtic and others that in our opinion are not Celtic. The former we shall group, for the moment, under the label northwestern Hispano-Celtic. The latter are the same features found in well-documented contemporary inscriptions in the region occupied by the Lusitanians, and therefore belonging to the variety known as LUSITANIAN, or more broadly as GALLO-LUSITANIAN. As we have already said, we do not consider this variety to belong to the Celtic language family. |first=Jordán |last=Colera |date=2007 |pages=750}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Prósper |first=B.M. |date=2005 |chapter=Estudios sobre la fonética y la morfología de la lengua celtibérica |language=es |trans-chapter=Studies on the phonetics and morphology of the Celtiberian language |title=Vascos, celtas e indoeuropeos. Genes y lenguas |trans-title=Basques, Celts and Indo-Europeans. Genes and languages |editor1-last=Villar Liebana |editor1-first=Francisco |editor1-link=Francisco Villar Liebana |editor2-last=Prósper |editor2-first=B.M. |publisher=Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca |pages=333–350 |isbn=84-7800-530-7}}</ref> It was spoken in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula comprising today's Spanish regions of [[Galicia (Spain)|Galicia]], western [[Asturias]] and western [[Castile and León]], and the [[Norte Region, Portugal|Norte Region]] in northern Portugal. |
||
== Use of term == |
|||
⚫ | The modern term ''Continental Celtic'' is used in contrast to ''[[Insular Celtic languages|Insular Celtic]]''. However, while many researchers agree with the ''Insular Celtic'' hypothesis that the Insular Celtic languages constitute a linguistically distinct branch of Celtic (Cowgill 1975; McCone 1991, 1992; Schrijver 1995) that has undergone common [[linguistics|linguistic]] innovations, there is no evidence that the ''Continental Celtic'' languages can be similarly grouped. Instead, the group called ''Continental Celtic'' is [[paraphyletic]]; the term refers simply to non-Insular Celtic languages and not to any special linguistic relationship between them as a group other than they are Celtic. Since little material has been preserved of any of the Continental Celtic languages, [[historical linguistics|historical linguistic]] analysis based on the [[comparative method]] is difficult to perform. Meanwhile, under the P/Q hypothesis, other researchers see the Brittonic languages and Gaulish as forming part of a subgroup of the Celtic languages that is known as [[P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages|P-Celtic]].{{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=17}} Under this hypothesis, Continental languages are P-Celtic except for Celtiberian and Gallaecian, which are Q-Celtic. The Continental Celtic languages have had a definite influence on all of the [[Romance languages]]. |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
Continental Celtic | |
---|---|
Geographic distribution | Continental Europe, Anatolia |
Linguistic classification | Indo-European
|
Subdivisions | |
Glottolog | None |
Celtic languages during the Iron Age and classical Antiquity. 1: early Iron Age core region (Hallstatt -H-, early La Tène -L-) 2: assumed Celtic expansion by the 4th century BC L: La Tène site H: Hallstatt site I: Iberia B: British Isles G: Galatia, settled in the 3rd century BC (after 279 BC) |
The Continental Celtic languages are the now-extinct group of the Celtic languages that were spoken on the continent of Europe and in central Anatolia, as distinguished from the Insular Celtic languages of the British Isles and Brittany. Continental Celtic is a geographic, rather than linguistic, grouping of the ancient Celtic languages.
These languages were spoken by the people known to Roman and Greek writers as the Keltoi, Celtae, Galli, and Galatae.[citation needed] They were spoken in an area arcing from the northern half of Iberia in the west to north of Belgium, and east to the Carpathian basin and the BalkansasNoric, and in inner Anatolia (modern day Turkey) as Galatian.
Even though Breton has been spoken in Continental Europe since at least the 6th century AD, it is not considered one of the Continental Celtic languages, as it is a Brittonic language, like Cornish and Welsh. A Gaulish substratum in Breton has been suggested, but that is debated.
It is likely that Celts spoke dozens of different languages and dialects across Europe in pre-Roman times, but only a small number are attested:
The modern term Continental Celtic is used in contrast to Insular Celtic. However, while many researchers agree with the Insular Celtic hypothesis that the Insular Celtic languages constitute a linguistically distinct branch of Celtic (Cowgill 1975; McCone 1991, 1992; Schrijver 1995) that has undergone common linguistic innovations, there is no evidence that the Continental Celtic languages can be similarly grouped. Instead, the group called Continental Celticisparaphyletic; the term refers simply to non-Insular Celtic languages and not to any special linguistic relationship between them as a group other than they are Celtic. Since little material has been preserved of any of the Continental Celtic languages, historical linguistic analysis based on the comparative method is difficult to perform. Meanwhile, under the P/Q hypothesis, other researchers see the Brittonic languages and Gaulish as forming part of a subgroup of the Celtic languages that is known as P-Celtic.[4] Under this hypothesis, Continental languages are P-Celtic except for Celtiberian and Gallaecian, which are Q-Celtic. The Continental Celtic languages have had a definite influence on all of the Romance languages.
In the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, and more specifically between the west and north Atlantic coasts and an imaginary line running north-south and linking Oviedo and Merida, there is a corpus of Latin inscriptions with particular characteristics of its own. This corpus contains some linguistic features that are clearly Celtic and others that in our opinion are not Celtic. The former we shall group, for the moment, under the label northwestern Hispano-Celtic. The latter are the same features found in well-documented contemporary inscriptions in the region occupied by the Lusitanians, and therefore belonging to the variety known as LUSITANIAN, or more broadly as GALLO-LUSITANIAN. As we have already said, we do not consider this variety to belong to the Celtic language family.
{{cite book}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(help)
| |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reconstructed |
| ||||||||||||
Continental Celtic |
| ||||||||||||
Insular Celtic |
| ||||||||||||
Unknown |
| ||||||||||||
Mixed |
| ||||||||||||
Celtic-speaking areas |
| ||||||||||||
Immersive education |
| ||||||||||||
Italics indicate extinct or ancestor languages |
Authority control databases: National ![]() |
|
---|