Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Attested languages  





2 Use of term  





3 See also  





4 References  





5 Bibliography  














Continental Celtic languages: Difference between revisions






Afrikaans
Asturianu
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
Boarisch
Català
Cymraeg
Deutsch
Español
فارسی
Français
Frysk
Gaeilge
Gaelg
Galego

Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
Kurdî
Latina
Lietuvių
Македонски
Nederlands

Norsk bokmål
Norsk nynorsk
Polski
Română
Русский
Slovenščina
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Svenska

Українська

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
add
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:

{{Infobox language family

{{Infobox language family

| name = Continental Celtic

| name = Continental Celtic

| acceptance = geographic

| region = Continental Europe, Anatolia

| region = Continental Europe, Anatolia

| familycolor = Indo-European

| familycolor = Indo-European

Line 19: Line 18:

| mapcaption = Celtic languages during the Iron Age and classical Antiquity. 1: early Iron Age core region (Hallstatt -H-, early La Tène -L-) 2: assumed Celtic expansion by the 4th century BC L: La Tène site H: Hallstatt site I: Iberia B: British Isles G: Galatia, settled in the 3rd century BC (after 279 BC)

| mapcaption = Celtic languages during the Iron Age and classical Antiquity. 1: early Iron Age core region (Hallstatt -H-, early La Tène -L-) 2: assumed Celtic expansion by the 4th century BC L: La Tène site H: Hallstatt site I: Iberia B: British Isles G: Galatia, settled in the 3rd century BC (after 279 BC)

}}

}}

[[File:Celtic languages.png|thumb|280px|The tentative Celtic clade, consisting of the proto- language and all the known daughter languages. It is tentative because other languages might be found.]]

The '''Continental Celtic languages''' are the now-extinct group of the [[Celtic languages]] that were spoken on the continent of Europe and in central [[Anatolia]], as distinguished from the [[Insular Celtic languages]] of the [[British Isles]] and [[Brittany]]. In the field of [[historical linguistics]], Continental and Insular Celtic are put forward as the main branches of the group, whichis itselfabranch of the [[Indo-European languages]]. As the word branch implies, this field primarily makes use of the [[family tree]] analogy. Indo-European is a tree with all the different groups as branches. No branches, no tree, and vice versa.



The '''Continental Celtic languages''' are the now-extinct group of the [[Celtic languages]] that were spoken on the continent of Europe and in central [[Anatolia]], as distinguished from the [[Insular Celtic languages]] of the [[British Isles]] and [[Brittany]]. ''Continental Celtic'' is a geographic, rather than linguistic, grouping of the ancient Celtic languages.

Not all the branches, however, are known. There are alternative hypotheses of the exact paths between known branches. For this reason, the late linguist, [[Calvert Watkins]], omits the upper branch lines between Proto-Indo-European and the various major daughter groups in his circular presentation of the tree on the rear fly leaves of the Fourth and other editions of the ''American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'', containing his essay "Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans" and his appendix on Indo-European roots. There are in that edition 15 major groups, some containing only one language. Theorists can connect these major branches according to their groupings.



These languages were spoken by the people known to Roman and Greek writers as the ''Keltoi'', ''Celtae'', ''Galli'', and ''Galatae''.{{citation needed|reason=evidence required for the Greek/Roman names for the peoples|date=June 2021}} They were spoken in an area arcing from the northern half of [[Iberian Peninsula|Iberia]] in the west to north of [[Belgium]], and east to the [[Carpathian basin]] and the [[Balkans]] as [[Noric language|Noric]], and in inner Anatolia (modern day Turkey) as [[Galatian language|Galatian]].

== The insular and continental branches ==

The branch labelled Celtic is divided into Insular and Continental. As they are branches, and not random groups, it is important to understand what that terminology means.



Suppose that over time a population P speaking a language L varies its speech so that in place of one population speaking one language are now two populations, P1 and P2, speaking two languages, L1 and L1. The latter are called [[sister language]]s, while L is depending on the speaker's preference a mother language, a parent language, an ancestor language, or a [[proto-language]]. L1 and L2 are daughter languages. Obviously any daughter language can itself be a proto-language, so that over time the degree of branching can become very great, as in [[Ethnologue]]'s language trees.<ref>For example, their tree for Indo-European contains 454 languages as of this date of access: {{cite web | title=Indo-European | publisher=Ethnologue | url=https://www.ethnologue.com/subgroup/3/ | access-date=6 April 2024}}</ref> They might also be very ornate and artistic.<ref>{{cite web | title=Old World Language Families | publisher=TOPPAN | url=https://toppandigital.com/us/blog-us/the-best-language-infographics-interactive-tools-on-the-web/ | access-date=6 April 2006}}</ref>


== Questions and answers of classification ==

===The double classification of Celtic===

<!--''Continental Celtic'' is a geographic, rather than linguistic, grouping of the ancient Celtic languages.-->

The modern term ''Continental Celtic'' is used in contrast to ''[[Insular Celtic languages|Insular Celtic]]''. However, while many researchers agree with the ''Insular Celtic'' hypothesis that the Insular Celtic languages constitute a linguistically distinct branch of Celtic (Cowgill 1975; McCone 1991, 1992; Schrijver 1995) that has undergone common [[linguistics|linguistic]] innovations, there is no evidence that the ''Continental Celtic'' languages can be similarly grouped. Instead, the group called ''Continental Celtic'' is [[paraphyletic]]; the term refers simply to non-Insular Celtic languages and not to any special linguistic relationship between them as a group other than they are Celtic. Since little material has been preserved of any of the Continental Celtic languages, [[historical linguistics|historical linguistic]] analysis based on the [[comparative method]] is difficult to perform. Meanwhile, under the P/Q hypothesis, other researchers see the Brittonic languages and Gaulish as forming part of a subgroup of the Celtic languages that is known as [[P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages|P-Celtic]].{{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=17}} Under this hypothesis, Continental languages are P-Celtic except for Celtiberian and Gallaecian, which are Q-Celtic. The Continental Celtic languages have had a definite influence on all of the [[Romance languages]].

Even though [[Breton language|Breton]] has been spoken in [[Continental Europe]] since at least the 6th century AD, it is not considered one of the Continental Celtic languages, as it is a [[Brittonic languages|Brittonic language]], like [[Cornish language|Cornish]] and [[Welsh language|Welsh]]. A Gaulish substratum in Breton has been suggested, but that is debated.

Even though [[Breton language|Breton]] has been spoken in [[Continental Europe]] since at least the 6th century AD, it is not considered one of the Continental Celtic languages, as it is a [[Brittonic languages|Brittonic language]], like [[Cornish language|Cornish]] and [[Welsh language|Welsh]]. A Gaulish substratum in Breton has been suggested, but that is debated.



== Attested languages ==

===Eliminating the doubt with hearsay and conjecture===

It is likely that [[Celts]] spoke dozens of different languages and [[dialects]] across Europe in pre-[[Roman Empire|Roman]] times, but only a small number are [[attested language|attested]]:


== Hypothetical languages ==

These languages were spoken by the people known to Roman and Greek writers as the ''Keltoi'', ''Celtae'', ''Galli'', and ''Galatae''.{{citation needed|reason=evidence required for the Greek/Roman names for the peoples|date=June 2021}} They were spoken in an area arcing from the northern half of [[Iberian Peninsula|Iberia]] in the west to north of [[Belgium]], and east to the [[Carpathian basin]] and the [[Balkans]] as [[Noric language|Noric]], and in inner Anatolia (modern day Turkey) as [[Galatian language|Galatian]].


It is likely that [[Celts]] spoke dozens of different languages and [[dialects]] across Europe in pre-[[Roman Empire|Roman]] times, but only a small number are either [[attested language|attested]] or infered from circumstantial evidence. The exact list varies according to the theorist and the state of the evidence. Currently there is evidence (not necessarily from comparative linguistics) for these branches:

* '''[[Lepontic language|Lepontic]]''' (6th to 4th century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was spoken on the southern side of the Alps. It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names.

* '''[[Lepontic language|Lepontic]]''' (6th to 4th century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was spoken on the southern side of the Alps. It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names.

* '''[[Gaulish]]''' (3rd century BC to 5th (?) century AD){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was the main language spoken in greater [[Gaul]]. This is often considered to be divided into two dialects, [[Cisalpine Gaulish|Cisalpine]] (spoken in what is now Italy) and [[Gaulish|Transalpine]] (spoken in what is now France). It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names and tribal names in writings of classical authors. It may have been a [[Stratum (linguistics)#Substratum|substratum]] to Breton (see below).

* '''[[Gaulish]]''' (3rd century BC to 5th (?) century AD){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} was the main language spoken in greater [[Gaul]]. This is often considered to be divided into two dialects, [[Cisalpine Gaulish|Cisalpine]] (spoken in what is now Italy) and [[Gaulish|Transalpine]] (spoken in what is now France). It is evidenced in a number of inscriptions as well as place names and tribal names in writings of classical authors. It may have been a [[Stratum (linguistics)#Substratum|substratum]] to Breton (see below).

Line 47: Line 33:

* '''[[Celtiberian language|Celtiberian]]''' or '''Northeastern Hispano-Celtic''' (3rd to 1st century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} is the name given to the language in northeast Iberia, between the headwaters of the [[Douro]], [[Tagus]], [[Júcar]] and [[Turía (river)|Turía]] rivers and the [[Ebro]] river. It is attested in some 200 inscriptions as well as place names. It is distinct from [[Iberian language|Iberian]].

* '''[[Celtiberian language|Celtiberian]]''' or '''Northeastern Hispano-Celtic''' (3rd to 1st century BC){{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=14}} is the name given to the language in northeast Iberia, between the headwaters of the [[Douro]], [[Tagus]], [[Júcar]] and [[Turía (river)|Turía]] rivers and the [[Ebro]] river. It is attested in some 200 inscriptions as well as place names. It is distinct from [[Iberian language|Iberian]].

* '''[[Gallaecian language|Gallaecian]]''' also called '''Gallaic''' or '''Northwestern Hispano-Celtic''', attested in a set (corpus) of Latin inscriptions containing isolated words and sentences that are unmistakably Celtic.<ref>{{cite book|quote=In the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, and more specifically between the west and north Atlantic coasts and an imaginary line running north-south and linking Oviedo and Merida, there is a corpus of Latin inscriptions with particular characteristics of its own. This corpus contains some linguistic features that are clearly Celtic and others that in our opinion are not Celtic. The former we shall group, for the moment, under the label northwestern Hispano-Celtic. The latter are the same features found in well-documented contemporary inscriptions in the region occupied by the Lusitanians, and therefore belonging to the variety known as LUSITANIAN, or more broadly as GALLO-LUSITANIAN. As we have already said, we do not consider this variety to belong to the Celtic language family. |first=Jordán |last=Colera |date=2007 |pages=750}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Prósper |first=B.M. |date=2005 |chapter=Estudios sobre la fonética y la morfología de la lengua celtibérica |language=es |trans-chapter=Studies on the phonetics and morphology of the Celtiberian language |title=Vascos, celtas e indoeuropeos. Genes y lenguas |trans-title=Basques, Celts and Indo-Europeans. Genes and languages |editor1-last=Villar Liebana |editor1-first=Francisco |editor1-link=Francisco Villar Liebana |editor2-last=Prósper |editor2-first=B.M. |publisher=Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca |pages=333–350 |isbn=84-7800-530-7}}</ref> It was spoken in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula comprising today's Spanish regions of [[Galicia (Spain)|Galicia]], western [[Asturias]] and western [[Castile and León]], and the [[Norte Region, Portugal|Norte Region]] in northern Portugal.

* '''[[Gallaecian language|Gallaecian]]''' also called '''Gallaic''' or '''Northwestern Hispano-Celtic''', attested in a set (corpus) of Latin inscriptions containing isolated words and sentences that are unmistakably Celtic.<ref>{{cite book|quote=In the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, and more specifically between the west and north Atlantic coasts and an imaginary line running north-south and linking Oviedo and Merida, there is a corpus of Latin inscriptions with particular characteristics of its own. This corpus contains some linguistic features that are clearly Celtic and others that in our opinion are not Celtic. The former we shall group, for the moment, under the label northwestern Hispano-Celtic. The latter are the same features found in well-documented contemporary inscriptions in the region occupied by the Lusitanians, and therefore belonging to the variety known as LUSITANIAN, or more broadly as GALLO-LUSITANIAN. As we have already said, we do not consider this variety to belong to the Celtic language family. |first=Jordán |last=Colera |date=2007 |pages=750}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Prósper |first=B.M. |date=2005 |chapter=Estudios sobre la fonética y la morfología de la lengua celtibérica |language=es |trans-chapter=Studies on the phonetics and morphology of the Celtiberian language |title=Vascos, celtas e indoeuropeos. Genes y lenguas |trans-title=Basques, Celts and Indo-Europeans. Genes and languages |editor1-last=Villar Liebana |editor1-first=Francisco |editor1-link=Francisco Villar Liebana |editor2-last=Prósper |editor2-first=B.M. |publisher=Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca |pages=333–350 |isbn=84-7800-530-7}}</ref> It was spoken in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula comprising today's Spanish regions of [[Galicia (Spain)|Galicia]], western [[Asturias]] and western [[Castile and León]], and the [[Norte Region, Portugal|Norte Region]] in northern Portugal.


== Use of term ==

The modern term ''Continental Celtic'' is used in contrast to ''[[Insular Celtic languages|Insular Celtic]]''. However, while many researchers agree with the ''Insular Celtic'' hypothesis that the Insular Celtic languages constitute a linguistically distinct branch of Celtic (Cowgill 1975; McCone 1991, 1992; Schrijver 1995) that has undergone common [[linguistics|linguistic]] innovations, there is no evidence that the ''Continental Celtic'' languages can be similarly grouped. Instead, the group called ''Continental Celtic'' is [[paraphyletic]]; the term refers simply to non-Insular Celtic languages and not to any special linguistic relationship between them as a group other than they are Celtic. Since little material has been preserved of any of the Continental Celtic languages, [[historical linguistics|historical linguistic]] analysis based on the [[comparative method]] is difficult to perform. Meanwhile, under the P/Q hypothesis, other researchers see the Brittonic languages and Gaulish as forming part of a subgroup of the Celtic languages that is known as [[P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages|P-Celtic]].{{sfn|Lambert|1994|p=17}} Under this hypothesis, Continental languages are P-Celtic except for Celtiberian and Gallaecian, which are Q-Celtic. The Continental Celtic languages have had a definite influence on all of the [[Romance languages]].



== See also ==

== See also ==


Latest revision as of 03:21, 2 June 2024

Continental Celtic
Geographic
distribution
Continental Europe, Anatolia
Linguistic classificationIndo-European
Subdivisions
GlottologNone

Celtic languages during the Iron Age and classical Antiquity. 1: early Iron Age core region (Hallstatt -H-, early La Tène -L-) 2: assumed Celtic expansion by the 4th century BC L: La Tène site H: Hallstatt site I: Iberia B: British Isles G: Galatia, settled in the 3rd century BC (after 279 BC)

The Continental Celtic languages are the now-extinct group of the Celtic languages that were spoken on the continent of Europe and in central Anatolia, as distinguished from the Insular Celtic languages of the British Isles and Brittany. Continental Celtic is a geographic, rather than linguistic, grouping of the ancient Celtic languages.

These languages were spoken by the people known to Roman and Greek writers as the Keltoi, Celtae, Galli, and Galatae.[citation needed] They were spoken in an area arcing from the northern half of Iberia in the west to north of Belgium, and east to the Carpathian basin and the BalkansasNoric, and in inner Anatolia (modern day Turkey) as Galatian.

Even though Breton has been spoken in Continental Europe since at least the 6th century AD, it is not considered one of the Continental Celtic languages, as it is a Brittonic language, like Cornish and Welsh. A Gaulish substratum in Breton has been suggested, but that is debated.

Attested languages[edit]

It is likely that Celts spoke dozens of different languages and dialects across Europe in pre-Roman times, but only a small number are attested:

Use of term[edit]

The modern term Continental Celtic is used in contrast to Insular Celtic. However, while many researchers agree with the Insular Celtic hypothesis that the Insular Celtic languages constitute a linguistically distinct branch of Celtic (Cowgill 1975; McCone 1991, 1992; Schrijver 1995) that has undergone common linguistic innovations, there is no evidence that the Continental Celtic languages can be similarly grouped. Instead, the group called Continental Celticisparaphyletic; the term refers simply to non-Insular Celtic languages and not to any special linguistic relationship between them as a group other than they are Celtic. Since little material has been preserved of any of the Continental Celtic languages, historical linguistic analysis based on the comparative method is difficult to perform. Meanwhile, under the P/Q hypothesis, other researchers see the Brittonic languages and Gaulish as forming part of a subgroup of the Celtic languages that is known as P-Celtic.[4] Under this hypothesis, Continental languages are P-Celtic except for Celtiberian and Gallaecian, which are Q-Celtic. The Continental Celtic languages have had a definite influence on all of the Romance languages.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Lambert 1994, p. 14.
  • ^ Colera, Jordán (2007). p. 750. In the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, and more specifically between the west and north Atlantic coasts and an imaginary line running north-south and linking Oviedo and Merida, there is a corpus of Latin inscriptions with particular characteristics of its own. This corpus contains some linguistic features that are clearly Celtic and others that in our opinion are not Celtic. The former we shall group, for the moment, under the label northwestern Hispano-Celtic. The latter are the same features found in well-documented contemporary inscriptions in the region occupied by the Lusitanians, and therefore belonging to the variety known as LUSITANIAN, or more broadly as GALLO-LUSITANIAN. As we have already said, we do not consider this variety to belong to the Celtic language family. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • ^ Prósper, B.M. (2005).『Estudios sobre la fonética y la morfología de la lengua celtibérica』[Studies on the phonetics and morphology of the Celtiberian language]. In Villar Liebana, Francisco; Prósper, B.M. (eds.). Vascos, celtas e indoeuropeos. Genes y lenguas [Basques, Celts and Indo-Europeans. Genes and languages] (in Spanish). Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. pp. 333–350. ISBN 84-7800-530-7.
  • ^ Lambert 1994, p. 17.
  • Bibliography[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Continental_Celtic_languages&oldid=1226833510"

    Categories: 
    Continental Celtic languages
    Extinct Celtic languages
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 errors: missing title
    CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Families rejected by Glottolog
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from June 2021
    CS1 French-language sources (fr)
    Articles containing Breton-language text
    Articles containing Cornish-language text
    Articles containing Irish-language text
    Articles containing Manx-language text
    Articles containing Scottish Gaelic-language text
    Articles containing Welsh-language text
    Articles with GND identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 2 June 2024, at 03:21 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki