Jump to content

Democratic Progressive Party: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added IPA transcription.
No edit summary
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:

| [[Progressivism]]

| [[Progressivism]]

| [[Social liberalism]]

| [[Social liberalism]]

| [[Taiwanese nationalism]]{{cref|a}}

| [[Taiwanese nationalism]]{{cref|A}}

| [[Anti-communism]]

| [[Anti-communism]]

| [[Anti-imperialism]]<ref>{{cite book |author=Chih-ming Wang |title=Transpacific Articulations: Study Abroad and the Making of Asia/America |date=2006 |publisher=University of California, Santa Cruz |pages=204}}</ref>

}}

}}

| headquarters = {{nowrap|10F-30, Beiping East Rd.}}<br>[[Zhongzheng District]], [[Taipei]], [[Taiwan]]<br>10049<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/about|title=DPP governance, committed to excellence|website=www.dpp.org.tw|access-date=25 July 2020|archive-date=29 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200729200450/https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/about|url-status=live}}</ref>

| headquarters = {{nowrap|10F-30, Beiping East Rd.}}<br>[[Zhongzheng District]], [[Taipei]], [[Taiwan]]<br>10049<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/about|title=DPP governance, committed to excellence|website=www.dpp.org.tw|access-date=25 July 2020|archive-date=29 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200729200450/https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/about|url-status=live}}</ref>

Line 28: Line 29:

| abbreviation = {{lang|en|DPP}}

| abbreviation = {{lang|en|DPP}}

| flag = Flag of Democratic Progressive Party.svg{{!}}border

| flag = Flag of Democratic Progressive Party.svg{{!}}border

| think_tank = [https://www.dppnff.tw/ New Frontier Foundation]

| think_tank = {{ill|New Frontier Foundation|zh|新境界文教基金會}}

| membership_year = 2023

| membership_year = 2023

| membership = {{decrease}} 238,664<ref>{{cite web |title=民主進步黨第十七屆黨主席補選結果新聞稿 |url=https://www.dpp.org.tw/media/contents/9936 |website=Democratic Progressive Party |access-date=24 May 2023 |date=15 January 2023 }}</ref>

| membership = {{decrease}} 238,664<ref>{{cite web |title=民主進步黨第十七屆黨主席補選結果新聞稿 |url=https://www.dpp.org.tw/media/contents/9936 |website=Democratic Progressive Party |access-date=24 May 2023 |date=15 January 2023 }}</ref>

| position = [[Centrism|Centre]] to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]]{{cref|b}}

| position = [[Centrism|Centre]] to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]]{{cref|B}}

| national = [[Pan-Green Coalition]]

| national = [[Pan-Green Coalition]]

| regional = [[Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats]]<ref>{{URL|http://cald.org/member-parties/democratic-progressive-party-of-taiwan/}}</ref>

| regional = [[Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats]]<ref>{{URL|http://cald.org/member-parties/democratic-progressive-party-of-taiwan/}}</ref>

Line 45: Line 46:

| seats5_title = [[Township (Taiwan)|Township]]/[[County-administered city|city]] mayors

| seats5_title = [[Township (Taiwan)|Township]]/[[County-administered city|city]] mayors

| seats5 = {{composition bar|40|204|hex={{party color|Democratic Progressive Party}}}}

| seats5 = {{composition bar|40|204|hex={{party color|Democratic Progressive Party}}}}

| footnotes = {{cnote|a|Taiwan independence is written in the DPP platform, but main DPP politicians support ''[[Huadu (Taiwan)|Huadu]]'' (ROC independence) position.}}

| footnotes = {{cnote|A|Taiwan independence is written in the DPP platform, but main DPP politicians support ''[[Huadu (Taiwan)|Huadu]]'' (ROC independence) position.}}

{{cnote|b|The DPP has also been characterized as [[centrism|centrist]]<ref>{{bulleted list

{{cnote|B|The DPP has also been characterized as [[centrism|centrist]]<ref>{{bulleted list

|{{cite book|last1=Derbyshire|first1=J. Denis|last2=Derbyshire|first2=Ian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RyAGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA108|volume=1|title=Encyclopedia of World Political Systems|page=108|publisher=Routledge|date=15 April 2016|isbn=978-1-3174-7156-1|access-date=10 January 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115115/https://books.google.com/books?id=RyAGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA108|url-status=live}}

|{{cite book|last1=Derbyshire|first1=J. Denis|last2=Derbyshire|first2=Ian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RyAGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA108|volume=1|title=Encyclopedia of World Political Systems|page=108|publisher=Routledge|date=15 April 2016|isbn=978-1-3174-7156-1|access-date=10 January 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115115/https://books.google.com/books?id=RyAGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA108|url-status=live}}

|{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nFjPNItB6kAC|title=The Economist|page=58|publisher=Economist Newspaper Limited|date=2011|access-date=10 January 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115106/https://books.google.com/books?id=nFjPNItB6kAC|url-status=live}}

|{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nFjPNItB6kAC|title=The Economist|page=58|publisher=Economist Newspaper Limited|date=2011|access-date=10 January 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115106/https://books.google.com/books?id=nFjPNItB6kAC|url-status=live}}

Line 63: Line 64:

| s = {{linktext|民主进步党}}

| s = {{linktext|民主进步党}}

| bpmf = ㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄓㄨˇ ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄅㄨˋ ㄉㄤˇ

| bpmf = ㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄓㄨˇ ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄅㄨˋ ㄉㄤˇ

| w = {{tone superscript|Min2-chu3 Chin4-pu4 Tang3}}

| w = Min²-chu³ Chin⁴-pu⁴ Tang³

| p = Mínzhǔ Jìnbù Dǎng

| p = Mínzhǔ Jìnbù Dǎng

| tp = Mínjhǔ Jìnbù Dǎng

| tp = Mín-jhǔ Jìn-bù Dǎng

| mps = Mínjǔ Jìnbù Dǎng

| mps = Mínjǔ Jìnbù Dǎng

| gr = Minjuu Jinnbuh Daang

| gr = Minjuu Jinnbuh Daang

Line 75: Line 76:

| s2 = {{linktext|民进党}}

| s2 = {{linktext|民进党}}

| bpmf2 = ㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄉㄤˇ

| bpmf2 = ㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄉㄤˇ

| w2 = {{tone superscript|Min2-chin4 Tang3}}

| w2 = Min²-chin⁴ Tang³

| p2 = Mínjìn Dǎng

| p2 = Mínjìn Dǎng

| tp2 = Mínjìn Dǎng

| tp2 = Mín-jìn Dǎng

| mps2 = Mínjìn Dǎng

| mps2 = Mínjìn Dǎng

| gr2 = Minjinn Daang

| gr2 = Minjinn Daang

Line 88: Line 89:

{{Politics of Taiwan footer}}

{{Politics of Taiwan footer}}



The '''Democratic Progressive Party'''{{efn native lang|tw|name=word1 |t=民主進步黨 |p=Mínzhǔ Jìnbù Dǎng |m=Bîn-tsú Tsìn-pōo Tóng |s=Mìn-chú Chin-phu Tóng}} ('''DPP'''){{efn native lang|tw|name=abbr |t=民進黨 |p=Mínjìndǎng}} is a [[Taiwanese nationalism|Taiwanese nationalist]] and [[Centrism|centre]] to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]] [[political party]] in [[Taiwan]].<ref name="economist">{{cite news |date=26 May 2018 |title=Hurry up: Taiwan's president has upset both business and workers |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |url=https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/05/26/taiwans-president-has-upset-both-business-and-workers |url-access=registration |access-date=25 June 2018 |archive-date=25 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180625075829/https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/05/26/taiwans-president-has-upset-both-business-and-workers |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=解嚴後臺灣政黨的競爭策略:Downs 理論的再檢視 |url=http://www2.scu.edu.tw/politics/journal/doc/j323/1.pdf |website=Soochow University |access-date=31 August 2019 |date=5 June 2014 |archive-date=31 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190831110132/http://www2.scu.edu.tw/politics/journal/doc/j323/1.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=藍與綠 台灣選民的意識型態初探 |url=https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/files/paper/117_09747810.pdf |website=Election Study Center National Chengchi University |access-date=31 August 2019 |date=May 2003 |archive-date=29 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200729213830/https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/files/paper/117_09747810.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> It is currently the major [[ruling party]] in Taiwan, controlling both the [[President of the Republic of China|presidency]] and the [[Government of the Republic of China|central government]], also the dominant party in the [[Pan-Green Coalition]].

The '''Democratic Progressive Party'''{{efn native lang|tw|name=word1 |t=民主進步黨 |p=Mínzhǔ Jìnbù Dǎng |m=Bîn-tsú Tsìn-pōo Tóng |s=Mìn-chú Chin-phu Tóng}} ('''DPP'''){{efn native lang|tw|name=abbr |t=民進黨 |p=Mínjìndǎng |m=Bîn-chìn Tóng |s=Mìn-chin Tóng}} is a [[Taiwanese nationalism|Taiwanese nationalist]] and [[Centrism|centre]] to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]] [[political party]] in [[Taiwan]].<ref name="economist">{{cite news |date=26 May 2018 |title=Hurry up: Taiwan's president has upset both business and workers |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |url=https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/05/26/taiwans-president-has-upset-both-business-and-workers |url-access=registration |access-date=25 June 2018 |archive-date=25 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180625075829/https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/05/26/taiwans-president-has-upset-both-business-and-workers |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=解嚴後臺灣政黨的競爭策略:Downs 理論的再檢視 |url=http://www2.scu.edu.tw/politics/journal/doc/j323/1.pdf |website=Soochow University |access-date=31 August 2019 |date=5 June 2014 |archive-date=31 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190831110132/http://www2.scu.edu.tw/politics/journal/doc/j323/1.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=藍與綠 台灣選民的意識型態初探 |url=https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/files/paper/117_09747810.pdf |website=Election Study Center National Chengchi University |access-date=31 August 2019 |date=May 2003 |archive-date=29 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200729213830/https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/files/paper/117_09747810.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> It is currently the major [[ruling party]] in Taiwan, controlling both the [[President of the Republic of China|presidency]] and the [[Government of the Republic of China|central government]], also the dominant party in the [[Pan-Green Coalition]].



Founded in 1986 by [[Hsu Hsin-liang]], [[Roger Hsieh|Hsieh Tsung-min]] and Lin Shui-chuan,<ref>{{Cite news |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=1986-09-25 |title=EXILES FROM TAIWAN OPPOSITION |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/25/world/exiles-from-taiwan-opposition.html |access-date=2022-08-27 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=27 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220827010035/https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/25/world/exiles-from-taiwan-opposition.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Three prominent Taiwan dissident politicians arrived in Tokyo today... |url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/11/29/Three-prominent-Taiwan-dissident-politicians-arrived-in-Tokyo-today/7019533624400/ |access-date=2022-08-27 |website=UPI |language=en}}</ref> a year prior to the end of [[Martial law in Taiwan|martial law]], the DPP is one of two [[Major party|major parties]] in Taiwan, the other being the historically dominant [[Kuomintang]] (KMT), which previously ruled the country as a [[one-party state]]. It has traditionally been associated with a strong advocacy of [[human rights]], emerging against the authoritarian [[White Terror (Taiwan)|White Terror]] that was initiated by the KMT, as well as the promotion of [[Taiwanese nationalism]] and [[Taiwanese identity|identity]]. [[Tsai Ing-wen]], who is a three-time [[Chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party|chairperson of the DPP]], serves as the incumbent [[President of the Republic of China|President]] and the [[List of presidents of the Republic of China|second]] member of the DPP to hold the presidency.<ref name="chinapost.com.tw">[http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/presidential-election/2012/01/14/329044/Tsai-steps.htm "Tsai steps down as DPP chair after defeat in presidential poll"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170430092405/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/presidential-election/2012/01/14/329044/Tsai-steps.htm |date=30 April 2017 }} (14 January 2012). ''The China Post''. Retrieved 6 April 2018.</ref>

Founded in 1986 by [[Hsu Hsin-liang]], [[Roger Hsieh|Hsieh Tsung-min]] and Lin Shui-chuan,<ref>{{Cite news |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=1986-09-25 |title=EXILES FROM TAIWAN OPPOSITION |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/25/world/exiles-from-taiwan-opposition.html |access-date=2022-08-27 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=27 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220827010035/https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/25/world/exiles-from-taiwan-opposition.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Three prominent Taiwan dissident politicians arrived in Tokyo today... |url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/11/29/Three-prominent-Taiwan-dissident-politicians-arrived-in-Tokyo-today/7019533624400/ |access-date=2022-08-27 |website=UPI |language=en}}</ref> a year prior to the end of [[Martial law in Taiwan|martial law]], the DPP is one of two [[Major party|major parties]] in Taiwan, the other being the historically dominant [[Kuomintang]] (KMT), which previously ruled the country as a [[one-party state]]. It has traditionally been associated with a strong advocacy of [[human rights]], emerging against the authoritarian [[White Terror (Taiwan)|White Terror]] that was initiated by the KMT, as well as the promotion of [[Taiwanese nationalism]] and [[Taiwanese identity|identity]]. [[Lai Ching-te]] is the current [[Chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party|chairperson of the DPP]] from 2023, who also serves as the incumbent [[President of the Republic of China|President]] and is the [[List of presidents of the Republic of China|third]] member of the DPP to hold the presidency.



The DPP is a longtime member of [[Liberal International]] and a founding member of the [[Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats]]. It represented Taiwan in the [[Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization]] (UNPO). The DPP is widely classified as [[Cultural liberalism|socially liberal]] having been founded as a party for human rights, including factions within the party supporting [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|same-sex marriage]] and [[LGBT rights in Taiwan|other LGBT rights]]. On foreign policy, the DPP is more willing to increase military expenditures to prevent military intimidation from the [[China|People's Republic of China]] (PRC) owing to the ambiguous [[political status of Taiwan]]. It favors closer ties with democratic nations such as [[Japan]] and the [[United States]], as well as the nations of [[ASEAN]] as part of its [[New Southbound Policy]]. The party is frequently accused by the [[Government of China|PRC government]] of being a primary force in Taiwan to "prevent the Chinese nation from achieving [[Chinese unification|complete reunification]]" and "halt the process of national rejuvenation"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Full Text: The Taiwan Question and China's Reunification in the New Era |url=http://ae.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/dshd/202208/t20220810_10740525.htm |access-date=2023-04-17 |website=ae.china-embassy.gov.cn}}</ref> due to the party's outspoken advocacy of the [[Taiwanese nationalism]], its supportive attitude to Taiwanese enjoying [[Self-determination|the right to decide their own future]],<ref>{{Cite web |title= Resolution on Taiwan's Future |url=https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/upload/download/Resolutions.pdf|access-date=2023-07-29 |website=www.dpp.org.tw/en/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= MOFA rebuts China's false claims concerning Taiwan's sovereignty |url=https://en.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1328&s=97750 |publisher=[[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Taiwan)]] |date=2022-04-26 |access-date=2023-07-29 |website=en.mofa.gov.tw}}</ref> and its firm opposition to the notion of "[[One China]]", including the alleged "[[1992 Consensus]]" narratives by both the [[Chinese Communist Party]] (CCP) and KMT.

The DPP is a longtime member of [[Liberal International]] and a founding member of the [[Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats]]. It represented Taiwan in the [[Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization]] (UNPO). The DPP is widely classified as [[Cultural liberalism|socially liberal]] having been founded as a party for human rights, including factions within the party supporting [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|same-sex marriage]] and [[LGBT rights in Taiwan|other LGBT rights]]. On foreign policy, the DPP is more willing to increase military expenditures to prevent military intimidation from the [[China|People's Republic of China]] (PRC) owing to the ambiguous [[political status of Taiwan]]. It favors closer ties with democratic nations such as [[Japan]] and the [[United States]], as well as the nations of [[ASEAN]] as part of its [[New Southbound Policy]]. The party is frequently accused by the [[Government of China|PRC government]] of being a primary force in Taiwan to "prevent the Chinese nation from achieving [[Chinese unification|complete reunification]]" and "halt the process of national rejuvenation"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Full Text: The Taiwan Question and China's Reunification in the New Era |url=http://ae.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/dshd/202208/t20220810_10740525.htm |access-date=2023-04-17 |website=ae.china-embassy.gov.cn}}</ref> due to the party's outspoken advocacy of the [[Taiwanese nationalism]], its supportive attitude to Taiwanese enjoying [[Self-determination|the right to decide their own future]],<ref>{{Cite web |title= Resolution on Taiwan's Future |url=https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/upload/download/Resolutions.pdf|access-date=2023-07-29 |website=www.dpp.org.tw/en/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= MOFA rebuts China's false claims concerning Taiwan's sovereignty |url=https://en.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1328&s=97750 |publisher=[[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Taiwan)]] |date=2022-04-26 |access-date=2023-07-29 |website=en.mofa.gov.tw}}</ref> and its firm opposition to the notion of "[[One China]]", including the alleged "[[1992 Consensus]]" narratives by both the [[Chinese Communist Party]] (CCP) and KMT.

Line 99: Line 100:

The ''tangwai'' were not a unified political unit and consisted of factions which carried over into the early DPP. At its founding the DPP consisted of three factions: the Kang group ,a moderate faction led by [[Kang Ning-hsiang]], [[New Tide faction]], consisting of intellectuals and social activists led by [[Wu Nai-ren]] and [[Chiou I-jen]], and the Progress Faction led by [[Lin Cheng-chieh]], a ''[[waishengren]]'' opposed to independence. Moderates would later coalesce around the Formosa faction, founded by those arrested during the [[Formosa Incident]] after their release from prison. In the early days of the party, the Formosa faction focused on winning elections by wielding the star power of its leaders, while New Tide would focus on ideological mobilization and developing grassroots support for social movements. As a result, the Formosa faction would become more moderate, often bending to public opinion, while New Tide would become more ideologically cohesive. By 1988 the Formosa Faction would dominate high-level positions within the party.<ref>{{cite book|author1-link=Shelley Rigger |last1=Rigger |first1=Shelley |title=From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party |date=1 May 2001 |publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers |isbn=978-1555879693| pages=21–27}}</ref>

The ''tangwai'' were not a unified political unit and consisted of factions which carried over into the early DPP. At its founding the DPP consisted of three factions: the Kang group ,a moderate faction led by [[Kang Ning-hsiang]], [[New Tide faction]], consisting of intellectuals and social activists led by [[Wu Nai-ren]] and [[Chiou I-jen]], and the Progress Faction led by [[Lin Cheng-chieh]], a ''[[waishengren]]'' opposed to independence. Moderates would later coalesce around the Formosa faction, founded by those arrested during the [[Formosa Incident]] after their release from prison. In the early days of the party, the Formosa faction focused on winning elections by wielding the star power of its leaders, while New Tide would focus on ideological mobilization and developing grassroots support for social movements. As a result, the Formosa faction would become more moderate, often bending to public opinion, while New Tide would become more ideologically cohesive. By 1988 the Formosa Faction would dominate high-level positions within the party.<ref>{{cite book|author1-link=Shelley Rigger |last1=Rigger |first1=Shelley |title=From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party |date=1 May 2001 |publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers |isbn=978-1555879693| pages=21–27}}</ref>



The party did not at the outset give explicit support to an independent Taiwanese national identity, partially because moderates such as [[Hsu Hsin-liang]] were concerned that such a move that could have invited a violent crackdown by the Kuomintang and alienate voters, but also because some members such as [[Lin Cheng-chieh]] supported unification. Partially due to their waning influence within the party and partially due to their ideological commitment, between 1988 and 1991 the New Tide Faction would push the independence issue, bolstered by the return of pro-independence activists from overseas who were previously barred from Taiwan. In 1991, in order to head off the New Tide, party chairman [[Hsu Hsin-liang]] of the moderate Formosa faction agreed to include language in the party charter which advocated for the drafting of a new constitution as well as declaration of a new Republic of Taiwan via referendum (which resulted in many pro-unification members leaving the party).<ref name="rigger27-32">{{cite book |last1=Rigger |first1=Shelley |title=From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party |date=1 May 2001 |publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers |isbn=978-1555879693 |pages=27–35}}</ref><ref name="1991article">{{cite journal |last1=Fell |first1=Dafydd |author1-link=Dafydd Fell |title=Measuring and Explaining Party Change in Taiwan: 1991–2004 |journal=Journal of East Asian Studies |date=2005 |volume=5 |issue=1 |page=112 |doi=10.1017/S1598240800006275 |jstor=23417889 |s2cid=153572606 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23417889 |access-date=18 December 2020 |archive-date=2 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210402125514/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23417889 |url-status=live }}</ref> However, the party would quickly begin to walk back on this language, and eventually in 1999 the party congress passed a [[Resolution on Taiwan's Future|resolution]] that Taiwan was already an independent country, under the official name "Republic of China," and that any constitutional changes should be approved by the people via referendum, while emphasizing the use of the name "Taiwan" in international settings.<ref name="resolution">{{cite web |title=DPP Party Convention |url=http://www.taiwandc.org/nws-9920.htm |access-date=18 December 2020 |archive-date=10 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610173456/http://www.taiwandc.org/nws-9920.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>

The party did not at the outset give explicit support to an independent Taiwanese national identity, partially because moderates such as [[Hsu Hsin-liang]] were concerned that such a move that could have invited a violent crackdown by the Kuomintang and alienate voters, but also because some members such as [[Lin Cheng-chieh]] supported unification. Partially due to their waning influence within the party and partially due to their ideological commitment, between 1988 and 1991 the New Tide Faction would push the independence issue, bolstered by the return of pro-independence activists from overseas who were previously barred from Taiwan. In 1991, in order to head off the New Tide, party chairman [[Hsu Hsin-liang]] of the moderate Formosa faction agreed to include language in the party charter which advocated for the drafting of a new constitution as well as declaration of a new Republic of Taiwan via referendum (which resulted in many pro-unification members leaving the party).<ref name="rigger27-32">{{cite book |last1=Rigger |first1=Shelley |title=From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party |date=1 May 2001 |publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers |isbn=978-1555879693 |pages=27–35}}</ref><ref name="1991article">{{cite journal |last1=Fell |first1=Dafydd |author1-link=Dafydd Fell |title=Measuring and Explaining Party Change in Taiwan: 1991–2004 |journal=Journal of East Asian Studies |date=2005 |volume=5 |issue=1 |page=112 |doi=10.1017/S1598240800006275 |jstor=23417889 |s2cid=153572606 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23417889 |access-date=18 December 2020 |archive-date=2 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210402125514/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23417889 |url-status=live }}</ref> However, the party would quickly begin to walk back on this language, and eventually in 1999 the party congress passed a [[Resolution on Taiwan's Future|resolution]] that Taiwan was already an independent country, under the official name "Republic of China", and that any constitutional changes should be approved by the people via referendum, while emphasizing the use of the name "Taiwan" in international settings.<ref name="resolution">{{cite web |title=DPP Party Convention |url=http://www.taiwandc.org/nws-9920.htm |access-date=18 December 2020 |archive-date=10 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610173456/http://www.taiwandc.org/nws-9920.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>



Despite its lack of electoral success, the pressure that the DPP created on the ruling KMT via its demands are widely credited in the political reforms of the 1990s, most notably the [[direct popular election]] of Republic of China's [[President of the Republic of China|president]] and all representatives in the [[National Assembly of the Republic of China|National Assembly]] and [[Legislative Yuan]], as well the ability to open discuss events from the past such as the [[February 28 Incident]] and its long aftermath of [[White Terror (Taiwan)|martial law]], and space for a greater variety of political views and advocacy. Once the DPP had representation in the [[Legislative Yuan]], the party used the legislature as a forum to challenge the ruling KMT.

Despite its lack of electoral success, the pressure that the DPP created on the ruling KMT via its demands are widely credited in the political reforms of the 1990s, most notably the [[direct popular election]] of Republic of China's [[President of the Republic of China|president]] and all representatives in the [[National Assembly of the Republic of China|National Assembly]] and [[Legislative Yuan]], as well the ability to open discuss events from the past such as the [[February 28 Incident]] and its long aftermath of [[White Terror (Taiwan)|martial law]], and space for a greater variety of political views and advocacy. Once the DPP had representation in the [[Legislative Yuan]], the party used the legislature as a forum to challenge the ruling KMT.

Line 113: Line 114:

The DPP won the presidency with the [[2000 Taiwan presidential election|election]] of [[Chen Shui-bian]] in March 2000 with a plurality, due to [[Pan-Blue]] voters splitting their vote between the Kuomintang and independent candidate [[James Soong]], ending 91 years of KMT rule in the Republic of China. Chen softened the party's stance on independence to appeal to moderate voters, appease the United States, and placate China. He also promised not to [[Four Noes and One Without|change the ROC state symbols or declare formal independence]] as long as the [[China|People's Republic of China]] did not attack Taiwan. Further, he advocated for economic exchange with China as well as the establishment of transportation links.<ref name="rigger-39-49" />

The DPP won the presidency with the [[2000 Taiwan presidential election|election]] of [[Chen Shui-bian]] in March 2000 with a plurality, due to [[Pan-Blue]] voters splitting their vote between the Kuomintang and independent candidate [[James Soong]], ending 91 years of KMT rule in the Republic of China. Chen softened the party's stance on independence to appeal to moderate voters, appease the United States, and placate China. He also promised not to [[Four Noes and One Without|change the ROC state symbols or declare formal independence]] as long as the [[China|People's Republic of China]] did not attack Taiwan. Further, he advocated for economic exchange with China as well as the establishment of transportation links.<ref name="rigger-39-49" />



In 2002 the DPP became the first party other than the KMT to reach a plurality in the Legislative Yuan following the [[2001 Taiwan legislative election|2001 legislative election]]. However, a majority coalition between the KMT, [[People First Party (Republic of China)|People First Party]], and [[New Party (Republic of China)|New Party]] prevented it from taking control of the chamber. This coalition was at odds with the presidency from the beginning, and led to President Chen's abandonment of the centrist positions that he ran his campaign on.<ref name="rigger-39-49" />

In 2002, the DPP became the first party other than the KMT to reach a plurality in the Legislative Yuan following the [[2001 Taiwan legislative election|2001 legislative election]]. However, a majority coalition between the KMT, [[People First Party (Republic of China)|People First Party]], and [[New Party (Republic of China)|New Party]] prevented it from taking control of the chamber. This coalition was at odds with the presidency from the beginning, and led to President Chen's abandonment of the centrist positions that he ran his campaign on.<ref name="rigger-39-49" />



In 2003, Chen announced a campaign to draft a referendum law as well as a new constitution, a move which appealed to the fundamentalist wing of the DPP. By now, the New Tide faction had begun to favor pragmatic approaches to their pro-independence goals and dominated decision-making positions within the party. By contrast, grassroots support was divided largely between moderate and fundamentalist wings. Though Chen's plans for a referendum on a new constitution were scuttled by the legislature, he did manage to include a largely symbolic [[2004 Taiwanese cross-Strait relations referendum|referendum on the PRC military threat]] to coincide with the [[2004 Taiwan presidential election|2004 presidential election]].<ref name="rigger-39-49" /> [[President of the Republic of China|President]] Chen Shui-bian would be narrowly re-elected in 2004 after an [[3-19 shooting incident|assassination attempt]] the day before the election, and in the [[2004 Taiwan legislative election|later legislative election]], the pan-blue coalition opposition retained control of the chamber.

In 2003, Chen announced a campaign to draft a referendum law as well as a new constitution, a move which appealed to the fundamentalist wing of the DPP. By now, the New Tide faction had begun to favor pragmatic approaches to their pro-independence goals and dominated decision-making positions within the party. By contrast, grassroots support was divided largely between moderate and fundamentalist wings. Though Chen's plans for a referendum on a new constitution were scuttled by the legislature, he did manage to include a largely symbolic [[2004 Taiwanese cross-Strait relations referendum|referendum on the PRC military threat]] to coincide with the [[2004 Taiwan presidential election|2004 presidential election]].<ref name="rigger-39-49" /> [[President of the Republic of China|President]] Chen Shui-bian would be narrowly re-elected in 2004 after an [[3-19 shooting incident|assassination attempt]] the day before the election, and in the [[2004 Taiwan legislative election|later legislative election]], the pan-blue coalition opposition retained control of the chamber.

Line 145: Line 146:


=== 2024–present: return to minority government ===

=== 2024–present: return to minority government ===

The January 13, 2024 [[2024 Taiwanese presidential election|presidential election]] and [[2024 Taiwanese legislative election|legislative elections]] led to the election of [[Lai Ching-te]] who won with 40.1% of the votes, while his opponents, [[Hou Yu-ih]] of the KMT had 33.5% of the votes, and [[Ko Wen-je]] of the [[Taiwan People's Party]] with 26.5% of the vote. In addition, this election made the DPP the first party to win three consecutive presidential terms since direct elections were introduced in [[1996 Taiwanese presidential election|1996]]. The DPP was unable to retain its majority in the Legislative Yuan, losing ten seats.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Chen|last2=Sam|last3=Lin|first1=Spe|first2=Cedric|first3=Jeremy C.F.|date=January 13, 2024|title=Taiwan Election Live Results|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/|work=Bloomberg|access-date=13 January 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240113045015/https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/|archive-date=13 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Tan|first=Clement|date=13 January 2024|title=China skeptic Lai Ching-te wins Taiwan's presidential election|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/13/taiwan-2024-election-dpps-lai-ching-te-wins.html|access-date=13 January 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240113122917/https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/13/taiwan-2024-election-dpps-lai-ching-te-wins.html|archive-date=13 January 2024|work=CNBC}}</ref>

The 13 January 2024 [[2024 Taiwanese presidential election|presidential election]] and [[2024 Taiwanese legislative election|legislative elections]] led to the election of [[Lai Ching-te]] who won with 40.1% of the votes, while his opponents, [[Hou Yu-ih]] of the KMT had 33.5% of the votes, and [[Ko Wen-je]] of the [[Taiwan People's Party]] with 26.5% of the vote. In addition, this election made the DPP the first party to win three consecutive presidential terms since direct elections were introduced in [[1996 Taiwanese presidential election|1996]]. The DPP was unable to retain its majority in the Legislative Yuan, losing ten seats.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Chen|last2=Sam|last3=Lin|first1=Spe|first2=Cedric|first3=Jeremy C.F.|date=January 13, 2024|title=Taiwan Election Live Results|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/|work=Bloomberg|access-date=13 January 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240113045015/https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/|archive-date=13 January 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Tan|first=Clement|date=13 January 2024|title=China skeptic Lai Ching-te wins Taiwan's presidential election|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/13/taiwan-2024-election-dpps-lai-ching-te-wins.html|access-date=13 January 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240113122917/https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/13/taiwan-2024-election-dpps-lai-ching-te-wins.html|archive-date=13 January 2024|work=CNBC}}</ref>



=={{anchor|Policies|Ideology|Political views|Political positions|Political ideology}}Ideology and policies==

=={{anchor|Policies|Ideology|Political views|Political positions|Political ideology}}Ideology and policies==

{{Taiwan independence movement|Extant parties}}

The DPP is a [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]] party<ref name="anticom">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PecLEAAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+Democratic+Progressive+Party&pg=PT129 |title=Introducing East Asia: History, Politics, Economy and Society |date=2020 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=9781317409922 |editor=Carin Holroyd |quote=Launched in 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is one of the two main political parties in Taiwan. The DPP is a centre-left, pan-Green party with a Taiwanese nationalist, strongly antiCommunist focus.}}</ref><ref>{{bulleted list|{{cite book|editor=Stephen Mills |title=The Australian Financial Review Asian Business Insight |quote=... the charade that Taiwan is simply a province of China-such as the centre-left Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ...|date=1994 |page=80 }}|{{cite journal|first=Dongtao|last=Qi|quote=Furthermore, the studies also suggest that the DPP, as a center-left party opposed to the center-right KMT, has been the leading force in addressing Taiwan's various social justice issues.|doi=10.1017/S0305741013001124|title=Globalization, Social Justice Issues, Political and Economic Nationalism in Taiwan: An Explanation of the Limited Resurgence of the DPP during 2008–2012|date=11 November 2013|journal=[[The China Quarterly]]|volume=216|pages=1018&ndash;1044|s2cid=154336295}}|{{cite journal|issn=1932-8036|url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2820|title=Celebrity Political Endorsement Effects: A Perspective on the Social Distance of Political Parties|first=Hsuan-Yi|last=Chou|volume=9|journal=[[International Journal of Communication]]|access-date=26 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191226031653/https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2820|archive-date=26 December 2019|url-status=dead}}|{{cite web |url=http://jppgnet.com/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/11.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200321074013/http://jppgnet.com/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/11.pdf |archive-date=2020-03-21 |url-status=live |title=The Heuristic Value of the Left—Right Schema in East Asia |author=W Jou |work=American Research Institute for Policy Development |quote=KMT voters in 2001 scored both the left-wing Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and center-left Democratic Progressive Party above 5.0, ... |date=2010 }}|{{cite journal|url=http://www.sppir.uav.ro/?p=53|title=Taiwanese consciousness vs. Chinese consciousness: The national identity and the dilemma of polarizing society in Taiwan|first=Li-Li|last=Huang|pages=119–132|volume=1|issue=1|journal=Societal and Political Psychology International Review|access-date=26 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200216001942/http://www.sppir.uav.ro/?p=53|archive-date=16 February 2020|url-status=dead}}|{{cite book |editor=Dongtao Qi |title=The Taiwan Independence Movement In And Out Power |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=82jFCwAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+DPP&pg=PA245 |quote=... two party-dominated system, with the center-right KMT and the center-left DPP, has been institutionalized in Taiwan. |date=2016 |page=245 |publisher=[[World Scientific]] |isbn=9789814689441 |access-date=3 May 2021 |archive-date=12 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115117/https://books.google.com/books?id=82jFCwAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+DPP&pg=PA245 |url-status=live }}|{{cite book |editor=Catherine Jones Finer |title=Comparing the Social Policy Experience of Britain and Taiwan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vn10DwAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+Democratic+Progressive+Party&pg=PT16 |quote=Taiwan's main, centre-left, party of opposition (the Democratic Progressive Party) has been committed to securing formal independence for Taiwan from the communist mainland, for all that its latest election success (March 2000) ... |date=2020 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=9781351793971 }}|{{cite web |url=https://theconversation.com/populism-comes-to-taiwan-in-election-focused-on-future-relationship-with-china-129198 |website=The Conversation |title=Populism comes to Taiwan in election focused on future relationship with China |quote=The DPP, on the other hand, is a centre-left party that pushes for Taiwanese autonomy from China and stays closer to the Americans. |date=10 January 2020 |access-date=19 June 2020 |archive-date=20 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200620072519/https://theconversation.com/populism-comes-to-taiwan-in-election-focused-on-future-relationship-with-china-129198 |url-status=live }}}}</ref><ref name="economist" /><ref name="Jacobin magazine">{{cite news |date=10 January 2020 |title=Viewing Taiwan From the Left |work=[[Jacobin magazine]] |url=https://jacobinmag.com/2020/01/taiwan-elections-hong-kong-protests-china-dpp-kmt |access-date=6 May 2020 |archive-date=26 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201226000501/https://jacobinmag.com/2020/01/taiwan-elections-hong-kong-protests-china-dpp-kmt |url-status=live }}</ref> generally described as progressive.<ref>{{cite web |date=12 January 2020 |title=Democracy prevails in Taiwan |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3855810 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114142120/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3855810 |archive-date=14 January 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020 |publisher=[[Taiwan News]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=21 May 2020 |title=With Tsai's Inauguration Over – The Work Begins |url=https://thetaiwantimes.com/with-tsais-inauguration-over-the-work-begins/2762 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200716124225/https://thetaiwantimes.com/with-tsais-inauguration-over-the-work-begins/2762 |archive-date=16 July 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020 |work=[[Taiwan Times]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=20 November 2019 |title=Why Do Taiwanese Empathize With Hong Kong Protesters? |url=https://international.thenewslens.com/article/127768 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707102214/https://international.thenewslens.com/article/127768 |archive-date=7 July 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020 |work=[[The News Lens]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=9 January 2020 |title=Progressives: Taiwan Would Like Your Attention |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/taiwan-china-election-progressive/ |access-date=7 July 2020 |work=[[The Nation]] |archive-date=7 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707164843/https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/taiwan-china-election-progressive/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="progressive" /> It has also been described as liberal,<ref name="progressive">{{cite book |title=Policy Analysis in Taiwan |date=2018 |publisher=Policy Press |editor=Kuo, Yu-Ying |quote=The Democratic Progressive Party, founded in 1986 by [[Hsu Hsin-liang]], [[Hsieh Tsung-min]] and [[Lin Shui-chuan]], is a progressive and liberal political party in Taiwan.}}</ref><ref name="SD">{{cite book |title=Taiwan International Review, Volume 5 |date=1999 |publisher=Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan, Mission in the United States |page=13 |quote=The DPP resembles a cross - mix of Western social democratic and liberal values .}}</ref> as well as social democratic.<ref name="SD" /><ref>{{cite news |date=20 May 2020 |title=Terry Glavin: Taiwan and its courageous leader a rare bright spot in our dreary COVID world |newspaper=National Post |url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/terry-glavin-taiwan-and-its-courageous-leader-a-rare-bright-spot-in-our-dreary-covid-world |access-date=19 June 2020 |quote=President Tsai went into Wednesday's ceremony with an approval rating of 70.3 per cent after besting her opponents in a landslide re-election in January, all the while quietly enduring Beijing's subversive efforts to unseat her and Xi Jinping's constant threats of war and occupation.The Taiwanese have been blessed with four years of Tsai's avowedly liberal, mildly social-democratic and happily free-enterprise government. |url-status=live |archive-url= https://archive.is/KPvkP |archive-date= 20 May 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4c1a1fKz4YkC&dq=Taiwan%27s+Democracy+on+Trial%3A+Political+Change+During+the+Chen+Shui-bian+Era+and+Beyond.+University+Press+of+America+socialist+DPP&pg=PA37 |title=Taiwan's Democracy on Trial: Political Change During the Chen Shui-bian Era and Beyond |date=2012 |publisher=University Press of America |isbn=9780761853206 |editor=John Franklin Copper |page=37 |quote=The DPP advanced a socialist agenda; the KMT copied much of it in order to preempt the DPP's program and weaken the DPP's political appeal. As it did this Taiwan became more and more a Western (social) democracy. |access-date=8 December 2021 |archive-date=12 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115121/https://books.google.com/books?id=4c1a1fKz4YkC&dq=Taiwan%27s+Democracy+on+Trial%3A+Political+Change+During+the+Chen+Shui-bian+Era+and+Beyond.+University+Press+of+America+socialist+DPP&pg=PA37 |url-status=live }}</ref> The party takes a [[Taiwanese nationalism|Taiwanese nationalist]] position, advocating for strengthening Taiwanese identity.<ref name="anticom" /> Programs supported by the party include moderate [[social welfare]] policies involving the rights of women, senior citizens, children, young people, labor, minorities, indigenous peoples, farmers, and other disadvantaged sectors of the society. Furthermore, its platform includes a legal and political order based on human rights and democracy; balanced economic and financial administration; fair and open social welfare; educational and cultural reform; and, independent defense and peaceful foreign policy with closer ties to United States and Japan. The party is socially liberal<ref name="SD" /><ref name="casey">{{cite web |last=Casey |first=Michael |date=12 June 2016 |title=Time to Start Worrying about Taiwan |url=http://nationalinterest.org/feature/time-start-worrying-about-taiwan-16551 |access-date=9 February 2018 |website=The National Interest |quote=The DPP's ideology emphasizes Taiwanese nationalism and the notion of a Taiwan that is politically and culturally distinct from mainland China. It also advocates social liberalism and is commonly associated with small- to medium-sized companies and organized labor. While the DPP wishes for greater independence from mainland China, the party is divided on the nature of that independence. |archive-date=9 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209182244/http://nationalinterest.org/feature/time-start-worrying-about-taiwan-16551 |url-status=live }}</ref> and has a progressive stance that includes support for [[gender equality]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|same-sex marriage]] under Tsai's leadership, and also has a conservative base that includes support from the [[Presbyterian Church in Taiwan]].

The DPP is a [[Centrism|centre]]<ref>{{bulleted list|{{cite book|last1=Derbyshire|first1=J. Denis|last2=Derbyshire|first2=Ian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RyAGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA108|volume=1|title=Encyclopedia of World Political Systems|page=108|publisher=Routledge|date=15 April 2016|isbn=978-1-3174-7156-1|access-date=10 January 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115115/https://books.google.com/books?id=RyAGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA108|url-status=live}}|{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nFjPNItB6kAC|title=The Economist|page=58|publisher=Economist Newspaper Limited|date=2011|access-date=10 January 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115106/https://books.google.com/books?id=nFjPNItB6kAC|url-status=live}}|{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nLAgAQAAMAAJ&q=dpp+centrist|title=Business Asia|page=40|publisher=[[Business International Corporation]]|date=2001|access-date=24 December 2020|archive-date=12 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115120/https://books.google.com/books?id=nLAgAQAAMAAJ&q=dpp+centrist|url-status=live}}|{{cite web|url=https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2002/taiwan|title=Taiwan|work=[[Freedom in the World]] 2002|publisher=[[Freedom House]]|date=2002|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191226012925/https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2002/taiwan|archive-date=26 December 2019|access-date=26 December 2019}}}}</ref> to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]] party<ref name="anticom">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PecLEAAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+Democratic+Progressive+Party&pg=PT129 |title=Introducing East Asia: History, Politics, Economy and Society |date=2020 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=9781317409922 |editor=Carin Holroyd |quote=Launched in 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is one of the two main political parties in Taiwan. The DPP is a centre-left, pan-Green party with a Taiwanese nationalist, strongly antiCommunist focus.}}</ref><ref>{{bulleted list|{{cite book|editor=Stephen Mills |title=The Australian Financial Review Asian Business Insight |quote=... the charade that Taiwan is simply a province of China-such as the centre-left Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ...|date=1994 |page=80 }}|{{cite journal|first=Dongtao|last=Qi|quote=Furthermore, the studies also suggest that the DPP, as a center-left party opposed to the center-right KMT, has been the leading force in addressing Taiwan's various social justice issues.|doi=10.1017/S0305741013001124|title=Globalization, Social Justice Issues, Political and Economic Nationalism in Taiwan: An Explanation of the Limited Resurgence of the DPP during 2008–2012|date=11 November 2013|journal=[[The China Quarterly]]|volume=216|pages=1018&ndash;1044|s2cid=154336295}}|{{cite journal|issn=1932-8036|url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2820|title=Celebrity Political Endorsement Effects: A Perspective on the Social Distance of Political Parties|first=Hsuan-Yi|last=Chou|volume=9|journal=[[International Journal of Communication]]|access-date=26 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191226031653/https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2820|archive-date=26 December 2019|url-status=dead}}|{{cite web |url=http://jppgnet.com/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/11.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200321074013/http://jppgnet.com/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/11.pdf |archive-date=2020-03-21 |url-status=live |title=The Heuristic Value of the Left—Right Schema in East Asia |author=W Jou |work=American Research Institute for Policy Development |quote=KMT voters in 2001 scored both the left-wing Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and center-left Democratic Progressive Party above 5.0, ... |date=2010 }}|{{cite journal|url=http://www.sppir.uav.ro/?p=53|title=Taiwanese consciousness vs. Chinese consciousness: The national identity and the dilemma of polarizing society in Taiwan|first=Li-Li|last=Huang|pages=119–132|volume=1|issue=1|journal=Societal and Political Psychology International Review|access-date=26 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200216001942/http://www.sppir.uav.ro/?p=53|archive-date=16 February 2020|url-status=dead}}|{{cite book |editor=Dongtao Qi |title=The Taiwan Independence Movement In And Out Power |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=82jFCwAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+DPP&pg=PA245 |quote=... two party-dominated system, with the center-right KMT and the center-left DPP, has been institutionalized in Taiwan. |date=2016 |page=245 |publisher=[[World Scientific]] |isbn=9789814689441 |access-date=3 May 2021 |archive-date=12 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115117/https://books.google.com/books?id=82jFCwAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+DPP&pg=PA245 |url-status=live }}|{{cite book |editor=Catherine Jones Finer |title=Comparing the Social Policy Experience of Britain and Taiwan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vn10DwAAQBAJ&q=taiwan+centre-left+Democratic+Progressive+Party&pg=PT16 |quote=Taiwan's main, centre-left, party of opposition (the Democratic Progressive Party) has been committed to securing formal independence for Taiwan from the communist mainland, for all that its latest election success (March 2000) ... |date=2020 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=9781351793971 }}|{{cite web |url=https://theconversation.com/populism-comes-to-taiwan-in-election-focused-on-future-relationship-with-china-129198 |website=The Conversation |title=Populism comes to Taiwan in election focused on future relationship with China |quote=The DPP, on the other hand, is a centre-left party that pushes for Taiwanese autonomy from China and stays closer to the Americans. |date=10 January 2020 |access-date=19 June 2020 |archive-date=20 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200620072519/https://theconversation.com/populism-comes-to-taiwan-in-election-focused-on-future-relationship-with-china-129198 |url-status=live }}}}</ref><ref name="economist" /><ref name="Jacobin magazine">{{cite news |date=10 January 2020 |title=Viewing Taiwan From the Left |work=[[Jacobin magazine]] |url=https://jacobinmag.com/2020/01/taiwan-elections-hong-kong-protests-china-dpp-kmt |access-date=6 May 2020 |archive-date=26 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201226000501/https://jacobinmag.com/2020/01/taiwan-elections-hong-kong-protests-china-dpp-kmt |url-status=live }}</ref> generally described as [[Progressivism|progressive]].<ref>{{cite web |date=12 January 2020 |title=Democracy prevails in Taiwan |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3855810 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114142120/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3855810 |archive-date=14 January 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020 |publisher=[[Taiwan News]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=21 May 2020 |title=With Tsai's Inauguration Over – The Work Begins |url=https://thetaiwantimes.com/with-tsais-inauguration-over-the-work-begins/2762 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200716124225/https://thetaiwantimes.com/with-tsais-inauguration-over-the-work-begins/2762 |archive-date=16 July 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020 |work=[[Taiwan Times]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=20 November 2019 |title=Why Do Taiwanese Empathize With Hong Kong Protesters? |url=https://international.thenewslens.com/article/127768 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707102214/https://international.thenewslens.com/article/127768 |archive-date=7 July 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020 |work=[[The News Lens]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=9 January 2020 |title=Progressives: Taiwan Would Like Your Attention |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/taiwan-china-election-progressive/ |access-date=7 July 2020 |work=[[The Nation]] |archive-date=7 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707164843/https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/taiwan-china-election-progressive/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="progressive" /> It has also been described as [[Liberalism|liberal]],<ref name="progressive">{{cite book |title=Policy Analysis in Taiwan |date=2018 |publisher=Policy Press |editor=Kuo, Yu-Ying |quote=The Democratic Progressive Party, founded in 1986 by [[Hsu Hsin-liang]], [[Hsieh Tsung-min]] and [[Lin Shui-chuan]], is a progressive and liberal political party in Taiwan.}}</ref><ref name="SD">{{cite book |title=Taiwan International Review, Volume 5 |date=1999 |publisher=Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan, Mission in the United States |page=13 |quote=The DPP resembles a cross - mix of Western social democratic and liberal values .}}</ref> as well as [[Social democracy|social democratic]].<ref name="SD" /><ref>{{cite news |date=20 May 2020 |title=Terry Glavin: Taiwan and its courageous leader a rare bright spot in our dreary COVID world |newspaper=National Post |url=https://nationalpost.com/opinion/terry-glavin-taiwan-and-its-courageous-leader-a-rare-bright-spot-in-our-dreary-covid-world |access-date=19 June 2020 |quote=President Tsai went into Wednesday's ceremony with an approval rating of 70.3 per cent after besting her opponents in a landslide re-election in January, all the while quietly enduring Beijing's subversive efforts to unseat her and Xi Jinping's constant threats of war and occupation.The Taiwanese have been blessed with four years of Tsai's avowedly liberal, mildly social-democratic and happily free-enterprise government. |url-status=live |archive-url= https://archive.today/20200520192115/https://nationalpost.com/opinion/terry-glavin-taiwan-and-its-courageous-leader-a-rare-bright-spot-in-our-dreary-covid-world |archive-date= 20 May 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4c1a1fKz4YkC&dq=Taiwan%27s+Democracy+on+Trial%3A+Political+Change+During+the+Chen+Shui-bian+Era+and+Beyond.+University+Press+of+America+socialist+DPP&pg=PA37 |title=Taiwan's Democracy on Trial: Political Change During the Chen Shui-bian Era and Beyond |date=2012 |publisher=University Press of America |isbn=9780761853206 |editor=John Franklin Copper |page=37 |quote=The DPP advanced a socialist agenda; the KMT copied much of it in order to preempt the DPP's program and weaken the DPP's political appeal. As it did this Taiwan became more and more a Western (social) democracy. |access-date=8 December 2021 |archive-date=12 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115121/https://books.google.com/books?id=4c1a1fKz4YkC&dq=Taiwan%27s+Democracy+on+Trial%3A+Political+Change+During+the+Chen+Shui-bian+Era+and+Beyond.+University+Press+of+America+socialist+DPP&pg=PA37 |url-status=live }}</ref> The party takes a [[Taiwanese nationalism|Taiwanese nationalist]] position, advocating for strengthening Taiwanese identity.<ref name="anticom" /> Programs supported by the party include moderate [[social welfare]] policies involving the rights of women, senior citizens, children, young people, labor, minorities, indigenous peoples, farmers, and other disadvantaged sectors of the society. Furthermore, its platform includes a legal and political order based on human rights and democracy; balanced economic and financial administration; fair and open social welfare; educational and cultural reform; and, independent defense and peaceful foreign policy with closer ties to United States and Japan. The party is socially liberal<ref name="SD" /><ref name="casey">{{cite web |last=Casey |first=Michael |date=12 June 2016 |title=Time to Start Worrying about Taiwan |url=http://nationalinterest.org/feature/time-start-worrying-about-taiwan-16551 |access-date=9 February 2018 |website=The National Interest |quote=The DPP's ideology emphasizes Taiwanese nationalism and the notion of a Taiwan that is politically and culturally distinct from mainland China. It also advocates social liberalism and is commonly associated with small- to medium-sized companies and organized labor. While the DPP wishes for greater independence from mainland China, the party is divided on the nature of that independence. |archive-date=9 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209182244/http://nationalinterest.org/feature/time-start-worrying-about-taiwan-16551 |url-status=live }}</ref> and has a progressive stance that includes support for [[gender equality]] and [[Same-sex marriage in Taiwan|same-sex marriage]] under Tsai's leadership, and also has a conservative base that includes support from the [[Presbyterian Church in Taiwan]].



=== Stance on Taiwanese independence ===

=== Stance on Taiwanese independence ===

Line 158: Line 160:

By contrast, the KMT or pan-blue coalition agrees that the Republic of China is an independent and sovereign country that is not part of the PRC, but argues that a one China principle (with different definitions across the strait) can be used as the basis for talks with China. The KMT also opposes Taiwan independence and argues that efforts to establish a Taiwanese national identity separated from the Chinese national identity are unnecessary and needlessly provocative. Some KMT conservative officials have called efforts from DPP "[[anti-China]]" (opposing migrants from mainland China, who DPP officials did not recognize as Taiwanese, but Chinese). At the other end of the political spectrum, the acceptance by the DPP of the symbols of the Republic of China is opposed by the [[Taiwan Solidarity Union]].

By contrast, the KMT or pan-blue coalition agrees that the Republic of China is an independent and sovereign country that is not part of the PRC, but argues that a one China principle (with different definitions across the strait) can be used as the basis for talks with China. The KMT also opposes Taiwan independence and argues that efforts to establish a Taiwanese national identity separated from the Chinese national identity are unnecessary and needlessly provocative. Some KMT conservative officials have called efforts from DPP "[[anti-China]]" (opposing migrants from mainland China, who DPP officials did not recognize as Taiwanese, but Chinese). At the other end of the political spectrum, the acceptance by the DPP of the symbols of the Republic of China is opposed by the [[Taiwan Solidarity Union]].



The first years of the DPP as the ruling party drew accusations from the opposition that, as a self-styled Taiwanese nationalist party, the DPP was itself inadequately sensitive to the ethnographic diversity of Taiwan's population. Where the KMT had been guilty of Chinese [[chauvinism]], the critics charged, the DPP might offer nothing more as a remedy than [[Hoklo people|Hoklo]] chauvinism.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Island the Left Neglected |url=https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/island-left-neglected-taiwan-dppp-tsai |access-date=2022-09-11 |website=Dissent Magazine |archive-date=11 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220911040435/https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/island-left-neglected-taiwan-dppp-tsai |url-status=live }}</ref> The DPP argues that its efforts to promote a Taiwanese national identity are merely an effort to normalize a Taiwanese identity repressed during years of authoritarian Kuomintang rule.

The first years of the DPP as the ruling party drew accusations from the opposition as a self-styled Taiwanese nationalist party, the DPP was itself inadequately sensitive to the ethnographic diversity of Taiwan's population. Where the KMT had been guilty of Chinese [[chauvinism]], the critics charged, the DPP might offer nothing more as a remedy than [[Hoklo people|Hoklo]] chauvinism.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Island the Left Neglected |url=https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/island-left-neglected-taiwan-dppp-tsai |access-date=2022-09-11 |website=Dissent Magazine |archive-date=11 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220911040435/https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/island-left-neglected-taiwan-dppp-tsai |url-status=live }}</ref> The DPP argues that its efforts to promote a Taiwanese national identity are merely an effort to normalize a Taiwanese identity repressed during years of authoritarian Kuomintang rule.



=== Support ===

=== Support ===



Since the democratization of Taiwan in the 1990s, the DPP has had its strongest performance in the [[Hokkien]]-speaking counties and cities of Taiwan, compared with the predominantly [[Hakka Chinese|Hakka]] and [[Mandarin Chinese|Mandarin]]-speaking counties, that tend to support the [[Kuomintang]].

Since the democratization of Taiwan in the 1990s, the DPP has had its strongest performance in the [[Taiwanese Hokkien|Hokkien]]-speaking counties and cities of Taiwan, compared with the predominantly [[Taiwanese Hakka|Hakka]] and [[Taiwanese Mandarin|Mandarin]]-speaking counties, that tend to support the [[Kuomintang]].



The deep-rooted hostility between [[Taiwanese aborigines]] and (Taiwanese) Hoklo, and the effective KMT networks within aboriginal communities contribute to aboriginal skepticism against the DPP and the aboriginals‘ tendency to vote for the KMT.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Damm|first1=Jens|editor1-last=Damm|editor1-first=Jens|editor2-last=Lim|editor2-first=Paul|title=European perspectives on Taiwan|date=2012|publisher=Springer VS|location=Wiesbaden|isbn=9783531943039|page=95|chapter=Multiculturalism in Taiwan and the Influence of Europe}}</ref> Aboriginals have criticized politicians for abusing the "indigenization" movement for political gains, such as aboriginal opposition to the DPP's "rectification" by recognizing the Truku for political reasons, where the Atayal and Seediq slammed the Truku for their name rectification.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=0t_CU9gmi8cC&dq=truku&pg=PA220 ed. Vinding 2004] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115332/https://books.google.com/books?id=0t_CU9gmi8cC&dq=truku&pg=PA220 |date=12 April 2023 }}, p. 220.</ref> In 2008, the majority of mountain townships voted for [[Ma Ying-jeou]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOusAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA28 Simon 2011] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115102/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOusAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA28 |date=12 April 2023 }}, p. 28.</ref> However, the DPP share of the aboriginal vote has been rising.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://frozengarlic.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/dpp-vote-share-in-aboriginal-townships/|title=DPP vote share in Aboriginal townships|date=30 November 2014|website=Frozen Garlic|access-date=10 April 2017|archive-date=11 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170411060055/https://frozengarlic.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/dpp-vote-share-in-aboriginal-townships/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.nationalia.info/new/10792/taiwan-president-to-apologize-to-aboriginal-people-promises-law-on-autonomy|title=Taiwan president to apologize to Aboriginal people, promises law on autonomy|work=Nationalia|access-date=10 April 2017|language=ca|archive-date=11 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170411055828/http://www.nationalia.info/new/10792/taiwan-president-to-apologize-to-aboriginal-people-promises-law-on-autonomy|url-status=live}}</ref>

The deep-rooted hostility between [[Taiwanese aborigines]] and (Taiwanese) Hoklo, and the effective KMT networks within aboriginal communities contribute to aboriginal skepticism against the DPP and the aboriginals‘ tendency to vote for the KMT.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Damm|first1=Jens|editor1-last=Damm|editor1-first=Jens|editor2-last=Lim|editor2-first=Paul|title=European perspectives on Taiwan|date=2012|publisher=Springer VS|location=Wiesbaden|isbn=9783531943039|page=95|chapter=Multiculturalism in Taiwan and the Influence of Europe}}</ref> Aboriginals have criticized politicians for abusing the "indigenization" movement for political gains, such as aboriginal opposition to the DPP's "rectification" by recognizing the Truku for political reasons, where the Atayal and Seediq slammed the Truku for their name rectification.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=0t_CU9gmi8cC&dq=truku&pg=PA220 ed. Vinding 2004] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115332/https://books.google.com/books?id=0t_CU9gmi8cC&dq=truku&pg=PA220 |date=12 April 2023 }}, p. 220.</ref> In 2008, the majority of mountain townships voted for [[Ma Ying-jeou]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOusAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA28 Simon 2011] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412115102/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOusAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA28 |date=12 April 2023 }}, p. 28.</ref> However, the DPP share of the aboriginal vote has been rising.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://frozengarlic.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/dpp-vote-share-in-aboriginal-townships/|title=DPP vote share in Aboriginal townships|date=30 November 2014|website=Frozen Garlic|access-date=10 April 2017|archive-date=11 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170411060055/https://frozengarlic.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/dpp-vote-share-in-aboriginal-townships/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.nationalia.info/new/10792/taiwan-president-to-apologize-to-aboriginal-people-promises-law-on-autonomy|title=Taiwan president to apologize to Aboriginal people, promises law on autonomy|work=Nationalia|access-date=10 April 2017|language=ca|archive-date=11 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170411055828/http://www.nationalia.info/new/10792/taiwan-president-to-apologize-to-aboriginal-people-promises-law-on-autonomy|url-status=live}}</ref>

Line 170: Line 172:

The DPP National Party Congress selects, for two-year terms, the 30 members of the Central Executive Committee and the 11 members of the Central Review Committee. The Central Executive Committee, in turn, chooses the 10 members of the Central Standing Committee. Since 2012, the DPP has had a "China Affairs Committee" to deal with [[Cross-Strait relations]]; the name caused some controversy within the party and in the Taiwan media, with critics suggesting that "Mainland Affairs Committee" or "Cross-Strait Affairs Committee" would show less of a hostile "[[One Country on Each Side]]" attitude.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90785/8031251.html|title=China Focus: "China Affairs Committee" negative to Taiwan opposition party: Taiwan media|agency=Xinhua|location=Taipei|date=22 November 2012|access-date=22 November 2012|archive-date=3 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130603005408/http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90785/8031251.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

The DPP National Party Congress selects, for two-year terms, the 30 members of the Central Executive Committee and the 11 members of the Central Review Committee. The Central Executive Committee, in turn, chooses the 10 members of the Central Standing Committee. Since 2012, the DPP has had a "China Affairs Committee" to deal with [[Cross-Strait relations]]; the name caused some controversy within the party and in the Taiwan media, with critics suggesting that "Mainland Affairs Committee" or "Cross-Strait Affairs Committee" would show less of a hostile "[[One Country on Each Side]]" attitude.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90785/8031251.html|title=China Focus: "China Affairs Committee" negative to Taiwan opposition party: Taiwan media|agency=Xinhua|location=Taipei|date=22 November 2012|access-date=22 November 2012|archive-date=3 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130603005408/http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90785/8031251.html|url-status=live}}</ref>



=== Factions ===

For many years the DPP officially recognized several factions within its membership, such as the [[New Tide faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|新潮流系}}), the [[Formosa faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|美麗島系}}), the [[Justice Alliance faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|正義連線系}}) and [[Welfare State Alliance faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|福利國系}}). Different factions endorse slightly different policies and are often generationally identifiable, representing individuals who had entered the party at different times. In 2006, the party ended recognition of factions.<ref name="fractions">{{cite news |first=Jewel |last=Huang |date=24 July 2006 |url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/07/24/2003320124 |newspaper=Taipei Times |title=DPP votes to do away with factions |page=1 |access-date=22 September 2006 |archive-date=29 September 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929155641/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/07/24/2003320124 |url-status=live }}</ref> The factions have since stated that they will comply with the resolution. However, the factions are still referred to by name in national media.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Engbarth|first1=Dennis|title=DPP campaign aims to bring people 'Happiness and Pride'|url=http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1322395&lang=eng_news&cate_img=logo_taiwan&cate_rss=TAIWAN_eng|access-date=30 January 2016|work=Taiwan News|date=19 July 2010|archive-date=2 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160202080606/http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1322395&lang=eng_news&cate_img=logo_taiwan&cate_rss=TAIWAN_eng|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Su|first1=Justin|last2=Yeh|first2=Sophia|last3=Wen|first3=Kui-hsiang|last4=Chang|first4=S. C.|title=New Tide remains largest faction inside DPP|url=http://focustaiwan.tw/search/201207150023.aspx?q=bear|access-date=31 January 2016|agency=Central News Agency|date=15 July 2012|archive-date=24 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160224152321/http://focustaiwan.tw/search/201207150023.aspx?q=bear|url-status=live}}</ref>


For many years the DPP officially recognized several factions within its membership, such as the [[New Tide faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|新潮流系}}), the [[Formosa faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|美麗島系}}), the [[Justice Alliance faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|正義連線系}}) and [[Welfare State Alliance faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|福利國系}}). Different factions endorse slightly different policies and are often generationally identifiable, representing individuals who had entered the party at different times. In 2006, the party ended recognition of factions.<ref name="fractions">{{cite news |first=Jewel |last=Huang |date=24 July 2006 |url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/07/24/2003320124 |newspaper=Taipei Times |title=DPP votes to do away with factions |page=1 |access-date=22 September 2006 |archive-date=29 September 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929155641/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/07/24/2003320124 |url-status=live }}</ref> The factions have since stated that they will comply with the resolution. However, the factions are still referred to by name in national media.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Engbarth|first1=Dennis|title=DPP campaign aims to bring people 'Happiness and Pride'|url=http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1322395&lang=eng_news&cate_img=logo_taiwan&cate_rss=TAIWAN_eng|access-date=30 January 2016|work=Taiwan News|date=19 July 2010|archive-date=2 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160202080606/http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1322395&lang=eng_news&cate_img=logo_taiwan&cate_rss=TAIWAN_eng|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Su|first1=Justin|last2=Yeh|first2=Sophia|last3=Wen|first3=Kui-hsiang|last4=Chang|first4=S. C.|title=New Tide remains largest faction inside DPP|url=http://focustaiwan.tw/search/201207150023.aspx?q=bear|access-date=31 January 2016|agency=Central News Agency|date=15 July 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160224152321/http://focustaiwan.tw/search/201207150023.aspx?q=bear|archive-date=24 February 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>


As of 2022, ''[[Taiwan News]]'' identified at least 7 factions within the party:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4605745 | title=The who and what on the DPP factions vying to shape Taiwan's future|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220727155651/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4605745|archive-date=27 July 2022|url-status=dead }}</ref>


* [[New Tide faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|新潮流系}}) - [[Lai Ching-te|William Lai]], [[Chen Chu]] , [[Tsai Chi-chang]], [[Chiu Tai-san]], [[Pan Men-an]] , [[Lai Pin-yu]]

* [[TNCPA]] ({{Script|Hanb|正國會}}) - [[Lin Chia-lung]], [[Chen Ting-fei|Fifi Chen Ting-fei]] , [[Lin Yu-chang|Lin You-chang]]

* [[Green Fellowship Association]] ({{Script|Hanb|綠色友誼系統}}) - [[Ho Chih-wei]]

* [[Taiwan Forward]]({{Script|Hanb|湧言會}}) - [[Lin Kun-hai]], [[Hsu Kuo-yung]]

* [[Su Faction]]({{Script|Hanb|蘇系}}) - [[Su Tseng-chang]]

* [[Ing Faction]] ({{Script|Hanb|英系}})- [[Tsai Ing-wen]], [[Chen Ming-wen]] , [[Kuan Bi-ling]]

* [[Democracy Living Water Connection]]({{Script|Hanb|民主活水連線}}) - [[Cho Jung-tai]], [[Luo Wen-jia]] , [[Lin Fei-fan]]



===Chair===

===Chair===

Line 204: Line 218:

|-

|-

![[2000 Taiwan presidential election|2000]]

![[2000 Taiwan presidential election|2000]]

|[[Chen Shui-bian]]

| rowspan="2" |[[Chen Shui-bian]]

|[[Annette Lu|Annette Lu Hsiu-lien]]

| rowspan="2" |[[Annette Lu|Annette Lu Hsiu-lien]]

| 4,977,737

| 4,977,737

| 39.30%

| 39.30%

Line 211: Line 225:

|-

|-

![[2004 Taiwan presidential election|2004]]

![[2004 Taiwan presidential election|2004]]

|[[Chen Shui-bian]]

|[[Annette Lu|Annette Lu Hsiu-lien]]

| 6,446,900

| 6,446,900

| 50.11%

| 50.11%

Line 218: Line 230:

|-

|-

![[2008 Taiwan presidential election|2008]]

![[2008 Taiwan presidential election|2008]]

|[[Frank Hsieh|Frank Hsieh Chang-ting]]

|Frank Hsieh Chang-ting

|[[Su Tseng-chang]]

|[[Su Tseng-chang]]

| 5,445,239

| 5,445,239

Line 225: Line 237:

|-

|-

![[2012 Taiwan presidential election|2012]]

![[2012 Taiwan presidential election|2012]]

|[[Tsai Ing-wen]]

| rowspan="3" |[[Tsai Ing-wen]]

|[[Su Jia-chyuan]]

|[[Su Jia-chyuan]]

| 6,093,578

| 6,093,578

Line 232: Line 244:

|-

|-

![[2016 Taiwan presidential election|2016]]

![[2016 Taiwan presidential election|2016]]

|[[Tsai Ing-wen]]

|[[Chen Chien-jen]] ([[File:Black-nill.png|15x15px]] {{small|[[Independent politician|Ind.]]}})

|[[Chen Chien-jen]] ([[File:Black-nill.png|15x15px]] {{small|[[Independent politician|Ind.]]}})

| 6,894,744

| 6,894,744

Line 239: Line 250:

|-

|-

![[2020 Taiwan presidential election|2020]]

![[2020 Taiwan presidential election|2020]]

|[[Tsai Ing-wen]]

|[[William Lai|Lai Ching‑te]]

|[[William Lai|Lai Ching‑te]]

|8,170,231

|8,170,231

Line 246: Line 256:

|-

|-

![[2024 Taiwanese presidential election|2024]]

![[2024 Taiwanese presidential election|2024]]

|[[Lai Ching-te]]

|Lai Ching-te

|[[Hsiao Bi-khim]]

|[[Hsiao Bi-khim]]

|5,586,019

|5,586,019

Line 497: Line 507:


==See also==

==See also==

{{portal|Taiwan}}

{{col div|colwidth=25em}}

* [[Progressivism in Taiwan]]

* [[Progressivism in Taiwan]]

* [[Human rights in Taiwan]]

* [[Human rights in Taiwan]]

Line 502: Line 514:

* [[Culture of Taiwan]]

* [[Culture of Taiwan]]

* [[Taiwan independence movement]]

* [[Taiwan independence movement]]

** [[Taiwan the Formosa]]

* [[Taiwan consensus]]

* [[Taiwanese people]]

* [[Taiwanese people]]

* [[Taiwanese identity]]

* [[Resolution on Taiwan's Future]]

* [[Resolution on Taiwan's Future]]

* [[Referendums in Taiwan]]

* [[Referendums in Taiwan]]

Line 510: Line 523:

* [[Formosa Incident]]

* [[Formosa Incident]]

* [[Sunflower Student Movement]]

* [[Sunflower Student Movement]]

{{Div col end}}



== Notes ==

== Notes ==

Line 533: Line 547:

[[Category:1986 establishments in Taiwan]]

[[Category:1986 establishments in Taiwan]]

[[Category:Anti-communist parties]]

[[Category:Anti-communist parties]]

[[Category:Anti-imperialist organizations]]

[[Category:Centre-left parties in Asia]]

[[Category:Centre-left parties in Asia]]

[[Category:Formerly banned political parties]]

[[Category:Formerly banned political parties]]


Latest revision as of 11:45, 20 June 2024

Democratic Progressive Party
民主進步黨
AbbreviationDPP
ChairpersonLai Ching-te
Secretary-GeneralYang Yi-shan (acting)
Founded28 September 1986; 37 years ago (1986-09-28)
Split fromTangwai
Headquarters10F-30, Beiping East Rd.
Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan
10049[1]
Think tankNew Frontier Foundation [zh]
Membership (2023)Decrease 238,664[2]
Ideology
Political positionCentre to centre-left[B]
National affiliationPan-Green Coalition
Regional affiliationCouncil of Asian Liberals and Democrats[4]
International affiliationLiberal International
Colors  Green
Legislative Yuan
51 / 113

Municipal mayors
2 / 6

Magistrates/mayors
3 / 16

Councilors
277 / 910

Township/city mayors
40 / 204

Party flag
Website
www.dpp.org.tw Edit this at Wikidata

^ A: Taiwan independence is written in the DPP platform, but main DPP politicians support Huadu (ROC independence) position.
^ B: The DPP has also been characterized as centrist[5] on an international political spectrum because of its historical positioning as the major big tent opposition party supporting democracy. It is also sometimes described as right-wing by pro-China or pro-communism media outlets owing to its anti-communism.[6]
Democratic Progressive Party
Traditional Chinese民主進步黨
Simplified Chinese民主进步党
DPP
Traditional Chinese民進黨
Simplified Chinese民进党

The Democratic Progressive Party[I] (DPP)[II] is a Taiwanese nationalist and centre to centre-left political party in Taiwan.[7][8][9] It is currently the major ruling party in Taiwan, controlling both the presidency and the central government, also the dominant party in the Pan-Green Coalition.

Founded in 1986 by Hsu Hsin-liang, Hsieh Tsung-min and Lin Shui-chuan,[10][11] a year prior to the end of martial law, the DPP is one of two major parties in Taiwan, the other being the historically dominant Kuomintang (KMT), which previously ruled the country as a one-party state. It has traditionally been associated with a strong advocacy of human rights, emerging against the authoritarian White Terror that was initiated by the KMT, as well as the promotion of Taiwanese nationalism and identity. Lai Ching-te is the current chairperson of the DPP from 2023, who also serves as the incumbent President and is the third member of the DPP to hold the presidency.

The DPP is a longtime member of Liberal International and a founding member of the Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats. It represented Taiwan in the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO). The DPP is widely classified as socially liberal having been founded as a party for human rights, including factions within the party supporting same-sex marriage and other LGBT rights. On foreign policy, the DPP is more willing to increase military expenditures to prevent military intimidation from the People's Republic of China (PRC) owing to the ambiguous political status of Taiwan. It favors closer ties with democratic nations such as Japan and the United States, as well as the nations of ASEAN as part of its New Southbound Policy. The party is frequently accused by the PRC government of being a primary force in Taiwan to "prevent the Chinese nation from achieving complete reunification" and "halt the process of national rejuvenation"[12] due to the party's outspoken advocacy of the Taiwanese nationalism, its supportive attitude to Taiwanese enjoying the right to decide their own future,[13][14] and its firm opposition to the notion of "One China", including the alleged "1992 Consensus" narratives by both the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and KMT.

History[edit]

The DPP's roots were in the Tangwai movement, which formed in opposition to the Kuomintang's one-party authoritarian rule under the "party-state" system during martial law. This movement culminated in the formation of the DPP as an alternative, but still illegal, party on 28 September 1986 by eighteen organizing members at Grand Hotel Taipei, with a total of 132 people joining the party in attendance. The new party members contested the 1986 election as "nonpartisan" candidates since competing parties would remain illegal until the following year. These early members of the party, like the tangwai, drew heavily from the ranks of family members and defense lawyers of political prisoners, as well as intellectuals and artists who had spent time abroad. These individuals were strongly committed to political change toward democracy and freedom of speech, press, assembly, and association.[15][16]

The tangwai were not a unified political unit and consisted of factions which carried over into the early DPP. At its founding the DPP consisted of three factions: the Kang group ,a moderate faction led by Kang Ning-hsiang, New Tide faction, consisting of intellectuals and social activists led by Wu Nai-ren and Chiou I-jen, and the Progress Faction led by Lin Cheng-chieh, a waishengren opposed to independence. Moderates would later coalesce around the Formosa faction, founded by those arrested during the Formosa Incident after their release from prison. In the early days of the party, the Formosa faction focused on winning elections by wielding the star power of its leaders, while New Tide would focus on ideological mobilization and developing grassroots support for social movements. As a result, the Formosa faction would become more moderate, often bending to public opinion, while New Tide would become more ideologically cohesive. By 1988 the Formosa Faction would dominate high-level positions within the party.[17]

The party did not at the outset give explicit support to an independent Taiwanese national identity, partially because moderates such as Hsu Hsin-liang were concerned that such a move that could have invited a violent crackdown by the Kuomintang and alienate voters, but also because some members such as Lin Cheng-chieh supported unification. Partially due to their waning influence within the party and partially due to their ideological commitment, between 1988 and 1991 the New Tide Faction would push the independence issue, bolstered by the return of pro-independence activists from overseas who were previously barred from Taiwan. In 1991, in order to head off the New Tide, party chairman Hsu Hsin-liang of the moderate Formosa faction agreed to include language in the party charter which advocated for the drafting of a new constitution as well as declaration of a new Republic of Taiwan via referendum (which resulted in many pro-unification members leaving the party).[18][19] However, the party would quickly begin to walk back on this language, and eventually in 1999 the party congress passed a resolution that Taiwan was already an independent country, under the official name "Republic of China", and that any constitutional changes should be approved by the people via referendum, while emphasizing the use of the name "Taiwan" in international settings.[20]

Despite its lack of electoral success, the pressure that the DPP created on the ruling KMT via its demands are widely credited in the political reforms of the 1990s, most notably the direct popular election of Republic of China's president and all representatives in the National Assembly and Legislative Yuan, as well the ability to open discuss events from the past such as the February 28 Incident and its long aftermath of martial law, and space for a greater variety of political views and advocacy. Once the DPP had representation in the Legislative Yuan, the party used the legislature as a forum to challenge the ruling KMT.

In 1996, DPP Chairman Shih Ming-teh united with the New Party to run for the President of the Legislative Yuan, but lost by one vote. The vote that was missing was legislator Chang Chin-cheng's failure to vote for Shih. As a result, Chang was expelled from the DPP.

Post-democratization, the DPP shifted their focus to anti-corruption issues, in particular regarding KMT connections to organized crime as well as "party assets" illegally acquired from the government during martial law.[21] Meanwhile, factions continued to form within the DPP as a mechanism for coalition-building within the party; notably, future President Chen Shui-bian would form the Justice Alliance faction.

2000–2008: in minority government[edit]

Former President Chen Shui-bian, the first DPP President (2000-2008)
Old DPP logo

The DPP won the presidency with the election of Chen Shui-bian in March 2000 with a plurality, due to Pan-Blue voters splitting their vote between the Kuomintang and independent candidate James Soong, ending 91 years of KMT rule in the Republic of China. Chen softened the party's stance on independence to appeal to moderate voters, appease the United States, and placate China. He also promised not to change the ROC state symbols or declare formal independence as long as the People's Republic of China did not attack Taiwan. Further, he advocated for economic exchange with China as well as the establishment of transportation links.[21]

In 2002, the DPP became the first party other than the KMT to reach a plurality in the Legislative Yuan following the 2001 legislative election. However, a majority coalition between the KMT, People First Party, and New Party prevented it from taking control of the chamber. This coalition was at odds with the presidency from the beginning, and led to President Chen's abandonment of the centrist positions that he ran his campaign on.[21]

In 2003, Chen announced a campaign to draft a referendum law as well as a new constitution, a move which appealed to the fundamentalist wing of the DPP. By now, the New Tide faction had begun to favor pragmatic approaches to their pro-independence goals and dominated decision-making positions within the party. By contrast, grassroots support was divided largely between moderate and fundamentalist wings. Though Chen's plans for a referendum on a new constitution were scuttled by the legislature, he did manage to include a largely symbolic referendum on the PRC military threat to coincide with the 2004 presidential election.[21] President Chen Shui-bian would be narrowly re-elected in 2004 after an assassination attempt the day before the election, and in the later legislative election, the pan-blue coalition opposition retained control of the chamber.

President Chen's moves sparked a debate within the party between fundamentalists and moderates who were concerned that voters would abandon their party. The fundamentalists won out, and as a result the DPP would largely follow Chen's lead. The DPP suffered a significant election defeat in nationwide local and county elections in December 2005, while the pan-blue coalition captured 16 of 23 county and city government offices under the leadership of popular Taipei mayor and KMT Party Chairman Ma Ying-jeou. Moderates within the party would blame this loss on the party's fundamentalist turn.[21]

The results led to a shake up of the party leadership. Su Tseng-chang resigned as DPP chairman soon after election results were announced. Su had pledged to step down if the DPP lost either Taipei County or failed to win 10 of the 23 mayor/magistrate positions. Vice President Annette Lu was appointed acting DPP leader. Presidential Office Secretary-General Yu Shyi-kun was elected in a three-way race against legislator Chai Trong-rong and Wong Chin-chu with 54.4% of the vote.

Premier Frank Hsieh, DPP election organizer and former mayor of Kaohsiung twice tendered a verbal resignation immediately following the election, but his resignation was not accepted by President Chen until 17 January 2006 after the DPP chairmanship election had concluded. The former DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang was appointed to replace Hsieh as premier. Hsieh and his cabinet resigned en masse on 24 January to make way for Su and his new cabinet. President Chen had offered the position of Presidential Office Secretary-General (vacated by Su) to the departing premier, but Hsieh declined and left office criticizing President Chen for his tough line on dealing with China.

In 2005, following the passage of the Anti-Secession Law, the Chen administration issued a statement asserting the position that Taiwan's future should be decided by the people on Taiwan only.[22]

Separate identity from China[edit]

On 30 September 2007, the DPP approved a resolution asserting a separate identity from China and called for the enactment of a new constitution for a "normal nation". It struck an accommodating tone by advocating general use of "Taiwan" as the country's name without calling for abandonment of the name Republic of China.[23]

Tsai Ing-wen, the second DPP President (2016–present) and the leader of the DPP (2008–2022). Tsai is the first female leader of the DPP.

2008–2016: return to opposition[edit]

In the national elections held in early months of 2008, the DPP won less than 25% of the seats (38.2% vote share) in the new Legislative Yuan while its presidential candidate, former Kaohsiung mayor Frank Hsieh, lost to KMT candidate Ma Ying-jeou by a wide margin (41.55% vs. 58.45%). In May, the DPP elected moderate Tsai Ing-wen as their new leader over fundamentalist Koo Kwang-ming.[21] Tsai became the first female leader of the DPP and the first female leader to lead a major party in Taiwan.

The first months since backed to the opposition were dominated by press coverage of the travails of Chen Shui-bian and his wife Wu Shu-jen. On 15 August 2008, Chen resigned from the DPP and apologized: "Today I have to say sorry to all of the DPP members and supporters. I let everyone down, caused you humiliation and failed to meet your expectations. My acts have caused irreparable damage to the party. I love the DPP deeply and am proud of being a DPP member. To express my deepest regrets to all DPP members and supporters, I announce my withdrawal from the DPP immediately. My wife Wu Shu-jen is also withdrawing from the party." DPP Chairperson followed with a public statement on behalf of the party: "In regard to Chen and his wife's decision to withdraw from the party and his desire to shoulder responsibility for his actions as well as to undergo an investigation by the party's anti-corruption committee, we respect his decision and accept it."[24]

The DPP vowed to reflect on public misgivings towards the party. Chairperson Tsai insisted on the need for the party to remember its history, defend the Republic of China's sovereignty and national security, and maintain its confidence.[25][26]

The party re-emerged as a voice in Taiwan's political debate when Ma's administration reached the end of its first year in office. The DPP marked the anniversary with massive rallies in Taipei and Kaohsiung. Tsai's address to the crowd in Taipei on 17 May proclaimed a "citizens' movement to protect Republic of China" seeking to "protect our democracy and protect Republic of China."[27]

2016–2024: in majority government[edit]

On 16 January 2016, Taiwan held a general election for its presidency and for the Legislative Yuan. The DPP gained the presidential seat, with the election of Tsai Ing-wen, who received 56.12% of the votes, while her opponent Eric Chu gained 31.2%.[28] In addition, the DPP gained a majority of the Legislative Yuan, winning 68 seats in the 113-seat legislature, up from 40 in 2012 election, thus giving them the majority for the first time in its history.[29]

President Tsai won reelection in the 2020 Taiwanese presidential election on 11 January 2020, and the Democratic Progressive Party retained its legislative majority, winning 61 seats.

2024–present: return to minority government[edit]

The 13 January 2024 presidential election and legislative elections led to the election of Lai Ching-te who won with 40.1% of the votes, while his opponents, Hou Yu-ih of the KMT had 33.5% of the votes, and Ko Wen-je of the Taiwan People's Party with 26.5% of the vote. In addition, this election made the DPP the first party to win three consecutive presidential terms since direct elections were introduced in 1996. The DPP was unable to retain its majority in the Legislative Yuan, losing ten seats.[30][31]

Ideology and policies[edit]

The DPP is a centre[32] to centre-left party[33][34][7][35] generally described as progressive.[36][37][38][39][40] It has also been described as liberal,[40][41] as well as social democratic.[41][42][43] The party takes a Taiwanese nationalist position, advocating for strengthening Taiwanese identity.[33] Programs supported by the party include moderate social welfare policies involving the rights of women, senior citizens, children, young people, labor, minorities, indigenous peoples, farmers, and other disadvantaged sectors of the society. Furthermore, its platform includes a legal and political order based on human rights and democracy; balanced economic and financial administration; fair and open social welfare; educational and cultural reform; and, independent defense and peaceful foreign policy with closer ties to United States and Japan. The party is socially liberal[41][44] and has a progressive stance that includes support for gender equality and same-sex marriage under Tsai's leadership, and also has a conservative base that includes support from the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan.

Stance on Taiwanese independence[edit]

The primary political axis in Taiwan involves the issue of Taiwan independence versus Chinese unification. Although the differences tend to be portrayed in polarized terms, both major coalitions have developed modified, nuanced and often complex positions. Though opposed in the philosophical origins, the practical differences between such positions can sometimes be subtle.

The current official position of the party is that Taiwan is an independent and sovereign country whose territory consists of Taiwan and its surrounding smaller islands and whose sovereignty derives only from the ROC citizens living in Taiwan (similar philosophy of self-determination), based on the 1999 "Resolution on Taiwan's Future". It considers Taiwan an independent nation under the name of Republic of China, making a formal declaration of independence unnecessary.[20] Though calls for drafting a new constitution and a declaration of a Republic of Taiwan was written into the party charter in 1991,[19] the 1999 resolution has practically superseded the earlier charter. The DPP rejects the so-called "One China principle" defined in 1992 as the basis for official diplomatic relations with the PRC and advocates a Taiwanese national identity which is separate from mainland China.[45]

By contrast, the KMT or pan-blue coalition agrees that the Republic of China is an independent and sovereign country that is not part of the PRC, but argues that a one China principle (with different definitions across the strait) can be used as the basis for talks with China. The KMT also opposes Taiwan independence and argues that efforts to establish a Taiwanese national identity separated from the Chinese national identity are unnecessary and needlessly provocative. Some KMT conservative officials have called efforts from DPP "anti-China" (opposing migrants from mainland China, who DPP officials did not recognize as Taiwanese, but Chinese). At the other end of the political spectrum, the acceptance by the DPP of the symbols of the Republic of China is opposed by the Taiwan Solidarity Union.

The first years of the DPP as the ruling party drew accusations from the opposition as a self-styled Taiwanese nationalist party, the DPP was itself inadequately sensitive to the ethnographic diversity of Taiwan's population. Where the KMT had been guilty of Chinese chauvinism, the critics charged, the DPP might offer nothing more as a remedy than Hoklo chauvinism.[46] The DPP argues that its efforts to promote a Taiwanese national identity are merely an effort to normalize a Taiwanese identity repressed during years of authoritarian Kuomintang rule.

Support[edit]

Since the democratization of Taiwan in the 1990s, the DPP has had its strongest performance in the Hokkien-speaking counties and cities of Taiwan, compared with the predominantly Hakka and Mandarin-speaking counties, that tend to support the Kuomintang.

The deep-rooted hostility between Taiwanese aborigines and (Taiwanese) Hoklo, and the effective KMT networks within aboriginal communities contribute to aboriginal skepticism against the DPP and the aboriginals‘ tendency to vote for the KMT.[47] Aboriginals have criticized politicians for abusing the "indigenization" movement for political gains, such as aboriginal opposition to the DPP's "rectification" by recognizing the Truku for political reasons, where the Atayal and Seediq slammed the Truku for their name rectification.[48] In 2008, the majority of mountain townships voted for Ma Ying-jeou.[49] However, the DPP share of the aboriginal vote has been rising.[50][51]

Structure[edit]

DPP headquarters at Huashan Business Building Level 10 in Taipei.[52]

The DPP National Party Congress selects, for two-year terms, the 30 members of the Central Executive Committee and the 11 members of the Central Review Committee. The Central Executive Committee, in turn, chooses the 10 members of the Central Standing Committee. Since 2012, the DPP has had a "China Affairs Committee" to deal with Cross-Strait relations; the name caused some controversy within the party and in the Taiwan media, with critics suggesting that "Mainland Affairs Committee" or "Cross-Strait Affairs Committee" would show less of a hostile "One Country on Each Side" attitude.[53]

Factions[edit]

For many years the DPP officially recognized several factions within its membership, such as the New Tide faction (新潮流系), the Formosa faction (美麗島系), the Justice Alliance faction (正義連線系) and Welfare State Alliance faction (福利國系). Different factions endorse slightly different policies and are often generationally identifiable, representing individuals who had entered the party at different times. In 2006, the party ended recognition of factions.[54] The factions have since stated that they will comply with the resolution. However, the factions are still referred to by name in national media.[55][56]

As of 2022, Taiwan News identified at least 7 factions within the party:[57]

Chair[edit]

Secretary-General[edit]

  • Current Secretary-General: Lin Hsi-yao (since May 2020)

Legislative Yuan leader (caucus leader)[edit]

Election results[edit]

Presidential elections[edit]

Election Candidate Running mate Total votes Share of votes Outcome
1996 Peng Ming-min Frank Hsieh Chang-ting 2,274,586 21.13% Defeated
2000 Chen Shui-bian Annette Lu Hsiu-lien 4,977,737 39.30% Elected
2004 6,446,900 50.11% Elected
2008 Frank Hsieh Chang-ting Su Tseng-chang 5,445,239 41.55% Defeated
2012 Tsai Ing-wen Su Jia-chyuan 6,093,578 45.63% Defeated
2016 Chen Chien-jen ( Ind.) 6,894,744 56.12% Elected
2020 Lai Ching‑te 8,170,231 57.13% Elected
2024 Lai Ching-te Hsiao Bi-khim 5,586,019 40.05% Elected

Legislative elections[edit]

Election Total seats won Total votes Share of votes Changes Party leader Status President
1989
21 / 130

Huang Hsin-chieh Minority Lee Teng-hui
1992
51 / 161

2,944,195 31.0% Increase 30 seats Hsu Hsin-liang Minority
1995
54 / 164

3,132,156 33.2% Increase 3 seats Shih Ming-teh Minority
1998
70 / 225

2,966,834 29.6% Increase 16 seats Lin Yi-hsiung Minority
2001
87 / 225

3,447,740 36.6% Increase 21 seats Chen Shui-bian Minority Chen Shui-bian
2004
89 / 225

3,471,429 37.9% Increase 2 seats Minority
2008
27 / 113

3,775,352 38.2% Decrease 62 seats Minority Ma Ying-jeou
2012
40 / 113

4,556,526 34.6% Increase 13 seats Tsai Ing-wen Minority
2016
68 / 113

5,370,953 44.1% Increase 28 seats Majority Tsai Ing-wen
2020
61 / 113

4,811,241 33.98% Decrease 7 seats Cho Jung-tai Majority
2024
51 / 113

4,981,060 36.16% Decrease 10 seats Lai Ching-te Minority Lai Ching-te

Local elections[edit]

Election Magistrates and mayors Councillors Township/city mayors Township/city council representatives Village chiefs Party leader
1994
provincial
1 / 3

52 / 175

Shih Ming-teh
1997–1998
12 / 23

114 / 886

28 / 319

Hsu Hsin-liang
1998
municipal
1 / 2

28 / 96

Lin Yi-hsiung
2001–2002
9 / 23

147 / 897

28 / 319

Chen Shui-bian
2002
municipal
1 / 2

31 / 96

2005
6 / 23

192 / 901

35 / 319

2006
municipal
1 / 2

33 / 96

2009
4 / 17

128 / 587

34 / 211

Tsai Ing-wen
2010
municipal
2 / 5

130 / 314

220 / 3,757

2014
unified
13 / 22

291 / 906

54 / 204

194 / 2,137

390 / 7,836

2018
unified
6 / 22

238 / 912

40 / 204

151 / 2,148

285 / 7,744

2022
unified
5 / 22

277 / 910

35 / 204

123 / 2,139

226 / 7,748

National Assembly elections[edit]

Election Total seats won Total votes Share of votes Changes Party leader Status President
1991
66 / 325

2,036,271 23.3% Increase66 seats Huang Shin-chieh Minority Lee Teng-hui
1996
127 / 334

3,121,423 29.9% Increase33 seats Shih Ming-teh Minority
2005
127 / 300

1,647,791 42.52% Increase28 seats Annette Lu Hsiu-lien Plurality Chen Shui-bian

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

Words in native languages[edit]

  1. ^

  2. ^

References[edit]

  1. ^ "DPP governance, committed to excellence". www.dpp.org.tw. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
  2. ^ "民主進步黨第十七屆黨主席補選結果新聞稿". Democratic Progressive Party. 15 January 2023. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  3. ^ Chih-ming Wang (2006). Transpacific Articulations: Study Abroad and the Making of Asia/America. University of California, Santa Cruz. p. 204.
  4. ^ cald.org/member-parties/democratic-progressive-party-of-taiwan/
  5. ^

    Derbyshire, J. Denis; Derbyshire, Ian (15 April 2016). Encyclopedia of World Political Systems. Vol. 1. Routledge. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-3174-7156-1. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
    The Economist. Economist Newspaper Limited. 2011. p. 58. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
    Business Asia. Business International Corporation. 2001. p. 40. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
    "Taiwan". Freedom in the World 2002. Freedom House. 2002. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.

    ^ 
    "". The News Lens (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 2 December 2018.
    "".  (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 10 September 2016. 
    "".  (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Retrieved 3 December 2014. [...]
    "". China Times (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 28 November 2017.
    "". China Times (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 28 December 2018. 西
    "". China Times (in Chinese (Taiwan)). 2 December 2022. [...]

    ^ ab"Hurry up: Taiwan's president has upset both business and workers". The Economist. 26 May 2018. Archived from the original on 25 June 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2018.

    ^ "Downs " (PDF). Soochow University. 5 June 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 August 2019. Retrieved 31 August 2019.

    ^ " " (PDF). Election Study Center National Chengchi University. May 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 31 August 2019.

    ^ "EXILES FROM TAIWAN OPPOSITION". The New York Times. 25 September 1986. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 August 2022. Retrieved 27 August 2022.

    ^ "Three prominent Taiwan dissident politicians arrived in Tokyo today..." UPI. Retrieved 27 August 2022.

    ^ "Full Text: The Taiwan Question and China's Reunification in the New Era". ae.china-embassy.gov.cn. Retrieved 17 April 2023.

    ^ "Resolution on Taiwan's Future" (PDF). www.dpp.org.tw/en/. Retrieved 29 July 2023.

    ^ "MOFA rebuts China's false claims concerning Taiwan's sovereignty". en.mofa.gov.tw. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Taiwan). 26 April 2022. Retrieved 29 July 2023.

    ^ Lu, Lu Hsin-hui; Kuo, Chung-han (28 September 2016). "DPP should clarify its cross-strait policy: founding member". Central News Agency. Archived from the original on 1 October 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.

    ^ Chung, Li-hua; Chin, Jonathan (30 September 2016). "DPP members say party must discuss core values". Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2016.

    ^ Rigger, Shelley (1 May 2001). From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party. Lynne Rienner Publishers. pp. 2127. ISBN 978-1555879693.

    ^ Rigger, Shelley (1 May 2001). From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party. Lynne Rienner Publishers. pp. 2735. ISBN 978-1555879693.

    ^ abFell, Dafydd (2005). "Measuring and Explaining Party Change in Taiwan: 19912004". Journal of East Asian Studies. 5(1): 112. doi:10.1017/S1598240800006275. JSTOR 23417889. S2CID 153572606. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 18 December 2020.

    ^ ab"DPP Party Convention". Archived from the original on 10 June 2011. Retrieved 18 December 2020.

    ^ abcdefRigger, Shelley (22 June 2016). Taiwan's Democracy Challenged: The Chen Shui-bian Years. Lynne Rienner Publishers. p. 42. ISBN 978-1626374041.

    ^ "The Official Position of the Republic of China on China's Passing of the Anti-secession (Anti-Separation) Law" (Press release). Mainland Affairs Council, ROC Executive Yuan. 29 March 2005. Archived from the original on 19 December 2016. Retrieved 16 February 2021. Section II-2: "'The Republic of China is an independent and sovereign state. Taiwan's sovereignty belongs to the 23 million people of Taiwan. Only the 23 million citizens of Taiwan may decide on the future of Taiwan.' This statement represents the greatest consensus within Taiwan's society today concerning the issues of national sovereignty and the future of Taiwan. It is also a common position shared by both the ruling and opposition parties in Taiwan. A recent opinion poll shows that more than 90% of the people of Taiwan agree with this position.

    ^ "Taiwan party asserts separate identity from China - USATODAY.com". usatoday30.usatoday.com. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2015.

    ^ "pacificmagazine.net, Former Republic of China President Resigns From Party Over Corruption Charges".[permanent dead link]

    ^ " via Yahoo! News, 調11 ".

    ^ " via Yahoo! News, 11% ".

    ^ "Tsai Ing-wen's Opening Speech at the 517 Rally". 17 May 2009. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 3 June 2009.

    ^ "Taiwan gets first female President as DPP sweeps election". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 16 January 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2016.

    ^ Hsiao, Alison (17 January 2016). "ELECTIONS: DPP to control Legislative Yuan". Taipei Times. p. 6. Archived from the original on 29 November 2022. Retrieved 16 January 2016.

    ^ Chen, Spe; Sam, Cedric; Lin, Jeremy C.F. (13 January 2024). "Taiwan Election Live Results". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 13 January 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2024.

    ^ Tan, Clement (13 January 2024). "China skeptic Lai Ching-te wins Taiwan's presidential election". CNBC. Archived from the original on 13 January 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2024.

    ^ 
    Derbyshire, J. Denis; Derbyshire, Ian (15 April 2016). Encyclopedia of World Political Systems. Vol. 1. Routledge. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-3174-7156-1. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
    The Economist. Economist Newspaper Limited. 2011. p. 58. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
    Business Asia. Business International Corporation. 2001. p. 40. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
    "Taiwan". Freedom in the World 2002. Freedom House. 2002. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.

    ^ abCarin Holroyd, ed. (2020). Introducing East Asia: History, Politics, Economy and Society. Routledge. ISBN 9781317409922. Launched in 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is one of the two main political parties in Taiwan. The DPP is a centre-left, pan-Green party with a Taiwanese nationalist, strongly antiCommunist focus.

    ^ 
    Stephen Mills, ed. (1994). The Australian Financial Review Asian Business Insight. p. 80. ... the charade that Taiwan is simply a province of China-such as the centre-left Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ...
    Qi, Dongtao (11 November 2013). "Globalization, Social Justice Issues, Political and Economic Nationalism in Taiwan: An Explanation of the Limited Resurgence of the DPP during 20082012". The China Quarterly. 216: 10181044. doi:10.1017/S0305741013001124. S2CID 154336295. Furthermore, the studies also suggest that the DPP, as a center-left party opposed to the center-right KMT, has been the leading force in addressing Taiwan's various social justice issues.
    Chou, Hsuan-Yi. "Celebrity Political Endorsement Effects: A Perspective on the Social Distance of Political Parties". International Journal of Communication. 9. ISSN 1932-8036. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
    W Jou (2010). "The Heuristic Value of the LeftRight Schema in East Asia" (PDF). American Research Institute for Policy Development. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 March 2020. KMT voters in 2001 scored both the left-wing Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and center-left Democratic Progressive Party above 5.0, ...
    Huang, Li-Li. "Taiwanese consciousness vs. Chinese consciousness: The national identity and the dilemma of polarizing society in Taiwan". Societal and Political Psychology International Review. 1(1): 119132. Archived from the original on 16 February 2020. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
    Dongtao Qi, ed. (2016). The Taiwan Independence Movement In And Out Power. World Scientific. p. 245. ISBN 9789814689441. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 3 May 2021. ... two party-dominated system, with the center-right KMT and the center-left DPP, has been institutionalized in Taiwan.
    Catherine Jones Finer, ed. (2020). Comparing the Social Policy Experience of Britain and Taiwan. Routledge. ISBN 9781351793971. Taiwan's main, centre-left, party of opposition (the Democratic Progressive Party) has been committed to securing formal independence for Taiwan from the communist mainland, for all that its latest election success (March 2000) ...
    "Populism comes to Taiwan in election focused on future relationship with China". The Conversation. 10 January 2020. Archived from the original on 20 June 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2020. The DPP, on the other hand, is a centre-left party that pushes for Taiwanese autonomy from China and stays closer to the Americans.
  6. ^ "Viewing Taiwan From the Left". Jacobin magazine. 10 January 2020. Archived from the original on 26 December 2020. Retrieved 6 May 2020.
  7. ^ "Democracy prevails in Taiwan". Taiwan News. 12 January 2020. Archived from the original on 14 January 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  8. ^ "With Tsai's Inauguration Over – The Work Begins". Taiwan Times. 21 May 2020. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  9. ^ "Why Do Taiwanese Empathize With Hong Kong Protesters?". The News Lens. 20 November 2019. Archived from the original on 7 July 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  10. ^ "Progressives: Taiwan Would Like Your Attention". The Nation. 9 January 2020. Archived from the original on 7 July 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  11. ^ a b Kuo, Yu-Ying, ed. (2018). Policy Analysis in Taiwan. Policy Press. The Democratic Progressive Party, founded in 1986 by Hsu Hsin-liang, Hsieh Tsung-min and Lin Shui-chuan, is a progressive and liberal political party in Taiwan.
  12. ^ a b c Taiwan International Review, Volume 5. Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan, Mission in the United States. 1999. p. 13. The DPP resembles a cross - mix of Western social democratic and liberal values .
  13. ^ "Terry Glavin: Taiwan and its courageous leader a rare bright spot in our dreary COVID world". National Post. 20 May 2020. Archived from the original on 20 May 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2020. President Tsai went into Wednesday's ceremony with an approval rating of 70.3 per cent after besting her opponents in a landslide re-election in January, all the while quietly enduring Beijing's subversive efforts to unseat her and Xi Jinping's constant threats of war and occupation.The Taiwanese have been blessed with four years of Tsai's avowedly liberal, mildly social-democratic and happily free-enterprise government.
  14. ^ John Franklin Copper, ed. (2012). Taiwan's Democracy on Trial: Political Change During the Chen Shui-bian Era and Beyond. University Press of America. p. 37. ISBN 9780761853206. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 8 December 2021. The DPP advanced a socialist agenda; the KMT copied much of it in order to preempt the DPP's program and weaken the DPP's political appeal. As it did this Taiwan became more and more a Western (social) democracy.
  15. ^ Casey, Michael (12 June 2016). "Time to Start Worrying about Taiwan". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 9 February 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2018. The DPP's ideology emphasizes Taiwanese nationalism and the notion of a Taiwan that is politically and culturally distinct from mainland China. It also advocates social liberalism and is commonly associated with small- to medium-sized companies and organized labor. While the DPP wishes for greater independence from mainland China, the party is divided on the nature of that independence.
  16. ^ "DPP denies existence of '1992 consensus'". Taipei Times. 25 December 2010. Archived from the original on 2 August 2021. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  17. ^ "The Island the Left Neglected". Dissent Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  18. ^ Damm, Jens (2012). "Multiculturalism in Taiwan and the Influence of Europe". In Damm, Jens; Lim, Paul (eds.). European perspectives on Taiwan. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. p. 95. ISBN 9783531943039.
  19. ^ ed. Vinding 2004 Archived 12 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, p. 220.
  20. ^ Simon 2011 Archived 12 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, p. 28.
  21. ^ "DPP vote share in Aboriginal townships". Frozen Garlic. 30 November 2014. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  22. ^ "Taiwan president to apologize to Aboriginal people, promises law on autonomy". Nationalia (in Catalan). Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  23. ^ "Contact". Archived from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
  24. ^ "China Focus: "China Affairs Committee" negative to Taiwan opposition party: Taiwan media". Taipei. Xinhua. 22 November 2012. Archived from the original on 3 June 2013. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  25. ^ Huang, Jewel (24 July 2006). "DPP votes to do away with factions". Taipei Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 22 September 2006.
  26. ^ Engbarth, Dennis (19 July 2010). "DPP campaign aims to bring people 'Happiness and Pride'". Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 2 February 2016. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
  27. ^ Su, Justin; Yeh, Sophia; Wen, Kui-hsiang; Chang, S. C. (15 July 2012). "New Tide remains largest faction inside DPP". Central News Agency. Archived from the original on 24 February 2016. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
  28. ^ "The who and what on the DPP factions vying to shape Taiwan's future". Archived from the original on 27 July 2022.

External links[edit]