Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
You are about to undo an edit. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit. If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary. Do not use the default message only. |
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
== Reception by the scientific community == |
== Reception by the scientific community == |
||
[[Jason Rosenhouse]] summarized the prevailing attitude of the scientific community. |
|||
|
"Scientists who have responded to ID arguments in print have generally done so with a tone of sneering contempt. This is understandable: ID supporters present fallacious arguments, use dishonest rhetoric, and often present non-contemptuous responses as evidence that their theories are gaining acceptance."<ref name="name">{{cite journal |last=Rosenhouse |first=Jason |author-link=Jason Rosenhouse |date=January 2003 |title=Leaders and Followers in the Intelligent-Design Movement |url=http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/1/6.full |journal=[[BioScience]] |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] on behalf of the [[American Institute of Biological Sciences]] |volume=53 |issue=1 |pages=6–7 |doi=10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0006:LAFITI]2.0.CO;2 |issn=0006-3568 |access-date=2014-05-19|doi-access=free }}</ref> |
||
Intelligent design advocates realize that their arguments have little chance of acceptance within the mainstream scientific community, so they direct them toward politicians, philosophers and the general public.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_010611.htm |title=The Pennsylvania Controversy |last=Johnson |first=Phillip E. |date=June 11, 2001 |website=[[Access Research Network]] |location=Goleta, CA |type=The Weekly Wedge Update |quote=Whether educational authorities allow the schools to teach about the controversy or not, public recognition that there is something seriously wrong with Darwinian orthodoxy is going to keep on growing. While the educators stonewall, our job is to continue building the community of people who understand the difference between a science that tests its theories against the evidence, and a pseudoscience that protects its key doctrines by imposing philosophical rules and erecting legal barriers to freedom of thought. |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_010507.htm |title=Icons of Evolution exposed on CNN |last=Johnson |first=Phillip E. |date=May 7, 2001 |website=Access Research Network |location=Goleta, CA |type=The Weekly Wedge Update |quote=If the science educators continue to pretend that there is no controversy to teach, perhaps the television networks and the newspapers will take over the responsibility of informing the public. |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_020409.htm |title=Passing the Torch |last=Johnson |first=Phillip E. |date=April 9, 2002 |website=Access Research Network |location=Goleta, CA |type=The Weekly Wedge Update |quote=If the public school educators will not "teach the controversy," our informal network can do the job for them. In time, the educators will be running to catch up. |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref> What prima facie "scientific" material they have produced has been attacked by critics as containing factual misrepresentation and misleading, [[rhetoric]]al and equivocal terminology. A number of [[documentary film|documentaries]] that promote their assertion that intelligent design as an increasingly well-supported line of scientific inquiry have been made for the Discovery Institute.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/a/2170 |title=Privileged Planet--New Science Documentary Explores Earth's Extraordinary Place in the Cosmos |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=August 20, 2004 |website=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/a/2116 |title=Unlocking the Mystery of Life--Documentary reveals growing number of scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution |last1=Meyer |first1=Stephen C. |author-link=Stephen C. Meyer |last2=Allen |first2=W. Peter |date=July 15, 2004 |website=Center for Science and Culture |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref> The bulk of the material produced by the intelligent design movement, however, is not intended to be scientific but rather to promote its social and political aims.<ref name="kitzmillerpg83" /><ref>{{cite court|litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District|vol=04|reporter=cv|opinion=2688|date=December 20, 2005}} [[s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/4:Whether ID Is Science#Page 89 of 139|Whether ID is Science, p. 89]]</ref><ref>{{cite court|litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District|vol=04|reporter=cv|opinion=2688|date=December 20, 2005}} [[s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/3:Disclaimer#Page 49 of 139|Disclaimer, p. 49]]</ref> Polls indicate that intelligent design's main appeal to citizens comes from its link to religious concepts.{{cn|date=March 2024}} |
Intelligent design advocates realize that their arguments have little chance of acceptance within the mainstream scientific community, so they direct them toward politicians, philosophers and the general public.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_010611.htm |title=The Pennsylvania Controversy |last=Johnson |first=Phillip E. |date=June 11, 2001 |website=[[Access Research Network]] |location=Goleta, CA |type=The Weekly Wedge Update |quote=Whether educational authorities allow the schools to teach about the controversy or not, public recognition that there is something seriously wrong with Darwinian orthodoxy is going to keep on growing. While the educators stonewall, our job is to continue building the community of people who understand the difference between a science that tests its theories against the evidence, and a pseudoscience that protects its key doctrines by imposing philosophical rules and erecting legal barriers to freedom of thought. |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_010507.htm |title=Icons of Evolution exposed on CNN |last=Johnson |first=Phillip E. |date=May 7, 2001 |website=Access Research Network |location=Goleta, CA |type=The Weekly Wedge Update |quote=If the science educators continue to pretend that there is no controversy to teach, perhaps the television networks and the newspapers will take over the responsibility of informing the public. |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_020409.htm |title=Passing the Torch |last=Johnson |first=Phillip E. |date=April 9, 2002 |website=Access Research Network |location=Goleta, CA |type=The Weekly Wedge Update |quote=If the public school educators will not "teach the controversy," our informal network can do the job for them. In time, the educators will be running to catch up. |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref> What prima facie "scientific" material they have produced has been attacked by critics as containing factual misrepresentation and misleading, [[rhetoric]]al and equivocal terminology. A number of [[documentary film|documentaries]] that promote their assertion that intelligent design as an increasingly well-supported line of scientific inquiry have been made for the Discovery Institute.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/a/2170 |title=Privileged Planet--New Science Documentary Explores Earth's Extraordinary Place in the Cosmos |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=August 20, 2004 |website=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/a/2116 |title=Unlocking the Mystery of Life--Documentary reveals growing number of scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution |last1=Meyer |first1=Stephen C. |author-link=Stephen C. Meyer |last2=Allen |first2=W. Peter |date=July 15, 2004 |website=Center for Science and Culture |publisher=Discovery Institute |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=2014-05-31}}</ref> The bulk of the material produced by the intelligent design movement, however, is not intended to be scientific but rather to promote its social and political aims.<ref name="kitzmillerpg83" /><ref>{{cite court|litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District|vol=04|reporter=cv|opinion=2688|date=December 20, 2005}} [[s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/4:Whether ID Is Science#Page 89 of 139|Whether ID is Science, p. 89]]</ref><ref>{{cite court|litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District|vol=04|reporter=cv|opinion=2688|date=December 20, 2005}} [[s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/3:Disclaimer#Page 49 of 139|Disclaimer, p. 49]]</ref> Polls indicate that intelligent design's main appeal to citizens comes from its link to religious concepts.{{cn|date=March 2024}} |
||
Copy and paste: – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · § Cite your sources: <ref></ref>
{{}} {{{}}} | [] [[]] [[Category:]] #REDIRECT [[]] <s></s> <sup></sup> <sub></sub> <code></code> <pre></pre> <blockquote></blockquote> <ref></ref> <ref name="" /> {{Reflist}} <references /> <includeonly></includeonly> <noinclude></noinclude> {{DEFAULTSORT:}} <nowiki></nowiki> <!-- --> <span class="plainlinks"></span>
Symbols: ~ | ¡ ¿ † ‡ ↔ ↑ ↓ • ¶ # ∞ ‹› «» ¤ ₳ ฿ ₵ ¢ ₡ ₢ $ ₫ ₯ € ₠ ₣ ƒ ₴ ₭ ₤ ℳ ₥ ₦ № ₧ ₰ £ ៛ ₨ ₪ ৳ ₮ ₩ ¥ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ 𝄫 ♭ ♮ ♯ 𝄪 © ® ™
Latin: A a Á á À à  â Ä ä Ǎ ǎ Ă ă Ā ā à ã Å å Ą ą Æ æ Ǣ ǣ B b C c Ć ć Ċ ċ Ĉ ĉ Č č Ç ç D d Ď ď Đ đ Ḍ ḍ Ð ð E e É é È è Ė ė Ê ê Ë ë Ě ě Ĕ ĕ Ē ē Ẽ ẽ Ę ę Ẹ ẹ Ɛ ɛ Ǝ ǝ Ə ə F f G g Ġ ġ Ĝ ĝ Ğ ğ Ģ ģ H h Ĥ ĥ Ħ ħ Ḥ ḥ I i İ ı Í í Ì ì Î î Ï ï Ǐ ǐ Ĭ ĭ Ī ī Ĩ ĩ Į į Ị ị J j Ĵ ĵ K k Ķ ķ L l Ĺ ĺ Ŀ ŀ Ľ ľ Ļ ļ Ł ł Ḷ ḷ Ḹ ḹ M m Ṃ ṃ N n Ń ń Ň ň Ñ ñ Ņ ņ Ṇ ṇ Ŋ ŋ O o Ó ó Ò ò Ô ô Ö ö Ǒ ǒ Ŏ ŏ Ō ō Õ õ Ǫ ǫ Ọ ọ Ő ő Ø ø Œ œ Ɔ ɔ P p Q q R r Ŕ ŕ Ř ř Ŗ ŗ Ṛ ṛ Ṝ ṝ S s Ś ś Ŝ ŝ Š š Ş ş Ș ș Ṣ ṣ ß T t Ť ť Ţ ţ Ț ț Ṭ ṭ Þ þ U u Ú ú Ù ù Û û Ü ü Ǔ ǔ Ŭ ŭ Ū ū Ũ ũ Ů ů Ų ų Ụ ụ Ű ű Ǘ ǘ Ǜ ǜ Ǚ ǚ Ǖ ǖ V v W w Ŵ ŵ X x Y y Ý ý Ŷ ŷ Ÿ ÿ Ỹ ỹ Ȳ ȳ Z z Ź ź Ż ż Ž ž ß Ð ð Þ þ Ŋ ŋ Ə ə
Greek: Ά ά Έ έ Ή ή Ί ί Ό ό Ύ ύ Ώ ώ Α α Β β Γ γ Δ δ Ε ε Ζ ζ Η η Θ θ Ι ι Κ κ Λ λ Μ μ Ν ν Ξ ξ Ο ο Π π Ρ ρ Σ σ ς Τ τ Υ υ Φ φ Χ χ Ψ ψ Ω ω {{Polytonic|}}
Cyrillic: А а Б б В в Г г Ґ ґ Ѓ ѓ Д д Ђ ђ Е е Ё ё Є є Ж ж З з Ѕ ѕ И и І і Ї ї Й й Ј ј К к Ќ ќ Л л Љ љ М м Н н Њ њ О о П п Р р С с Т т Ћ ћ У у Ў ў Ф ф Х х Ц ц Ч ч Џ џ Ш ш Щ щ Ъ ъ Ы ы Ь ь Э э Ю ю Я я ́
IPA: t̪ d̪ ʈ ɖ ɟ ɡ ɢ ʡ ʔ ɸ β θ ð ʃ ʒ ɕ ʑ ʂ ʐ ç ʝ ɣ χ ʁ ħ ʕ ʜ ʢ ɦ ɱ ɳ ɲ ŋ ɴ ʋ ɹ ɻ ɰ ʙ ⱱ ʀ ɾ ɽ ɫ ɬ ɮ ɺ ɭ ʎ ʟ ɥ ʍ ɧ ʼ ɓ ɗ ʄ ɠ ʛ ʘ ǀ ǃ ǂ ǁ ɨ ʉ ɯ ɪ ʏ ʊ ø ɘ ɵ ɤ ə ɚ ɛ œ ɜ ɝ ɞ ʌ ɔ æ ɐ ɶ ɑ ɒ ʰ ʱ ʷ ʲ ˠ ˤ ⁿ ˡ ˈ ˌ ː ˑ ̪ {{IPA|}}
Wikidata entities used in this page
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):
This page is a member of 6 hidden categories (help):
