Wichita language: Difference between revisions

{{Short description|Extinct Native American language}}

{{use mdy dates|date=February 2024}}

| name = Wichita

| nativename = Kirikirʔi:s|

| states = [[United States]]

| region = West-central [[Oklahoma]]

| ethnicity = 2,100 [[Wichita people]] (2007)

| extinct = 30 August 2016

| ref = <ref>{{Cite news |last=Poolaw |first=Rhiannon |date=31 August 2016 |title=Last Wichita Speaker Passes Away |url=http://www.kswo.com/story/32940602/last-wichita-speaker-passes-away |access-date=1 September 2016 |work=ABC News 7 |publisher=KSWO}}</ref>

| speakers2 = with the death of [[Doris McLemore]].

| familycolor = American

| fam1 = [[Caddoan languages|Caddoan]]

| fam2 = Northern

| iso3 = wic

| lingua = 64-BAC > 64-BAC-a

| map = Oklahoma Indian Languages.png

| mapcaption = Distribution of [[Indigenous languages of the Americas|Native American languages]] in [[Oklahoma]]

| notice = IPA

| glotto = wich1260

| glottorefname = Wichita

'''Wichita''' is an [[extinct language|extinct]] [[Caddoan languages|Caddoan]] language once spoken in [[Oklahoma]] by the [[Wichita and Affiliated Tribes]]. The last fluent heritage speaker, [[Doris Lamar-McLemore]], died in 2016,<ref name="NPR">{{Cite interview |last=McLemore |first=Doris |interviewer=Stewart, Alison |title=The Last Living Speaker of Wichita |url=https://www.npr.org/2008/01/30/18532656/the-last-living-speaker-of-wichita |work=The Bryant Park Project |publisher=[[NPR]] |date=2008-01-30}}</ref> although in 2007 there were three first-language speakers alive.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405">{{harvnb|Rood|2008|pp=395–405}}</ref> This has rendered Wichita functionally [[extinct language|extinct]]; however, the tribe offers classes to revitalize the language<ref name="wt">[http://www.wichitatribe.com/language_class.htm Wichita Language Class.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100702224745/http://www.wichitatribe.com/language_class.htm |date=2010-07-02 }} ''Wichita and Affiliated Tribes.'' 18 Feb 2009 (retrieved 14 Nov 2019)</ref> and works in partnership with the Wichita Documentation Project of the [[University of Colorado, Boulder]].<ref name="ucb">[http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/aboutproj.html "Wichita: About the Project."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111116033539/http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/aboutproj.html |date=2011-11-16 }} ''Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Boulder.'' (retrieved 17 July 2010)</ref>

When the Europeans began to settle North America, Wichita separated into three dialects; Waco, Tawakoni, and Kirikirʔi꞉s (aka, Wichita Proper).<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" /> However, when the language was threatened and the number of speakers decreased, dialect differences largely disappeared.{{sfn|Taylor|1963}}

As late as 2007 there were three living native speakers,<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337">{{harvnb|Rood|1975}}</ref> but the last known fluent native speaker, [[Doris Lamar-McLemore]], died on 30 August 2016. This is a sharp decline from the 500 speakers estimated by Paul L. Garvin in 1950.<ref name="Garvin, 1950, p. 179-184">{{harvnb|Garvin|1950}}</ref>

Wichita is a member of the Caddoan language family, along with modern Caddo, Pawnee, Arikara, and Kitsai.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

The phonology of Wichita is unusual, with no pure [[labial consonant]]s (though there are two [[Labialized velar consonant|labiovelars]] /kʷ/ and /w/). There is only one nasal (depending on conflicting theory one or more nasal sounds may appear, but all theories seem to agree that they are allophones of the same phoneme, at best), and possibly a three vowel system using only height for contrast.<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337" />

! rowspan="2" |[[Alveolar consonant|Alveolar]]

! colspan="2" | [[Dorsal consonant|Dorsal]]

! [[Plosive]]

| {{IPA link|t}}

| {{IPA link|k}}

| {{IPA link|kʷ}}

| {{IPA link|ʔ}}

! [[Affricate]]

| {{IPA link|t͡s}}

! [[Fricative]]

| {{IPA link|s}}

| {{IPA link|h}}

| {{IPA link|ɾ}} ~ {{IPA link|n}}

! [[Semivowel]]

| {{IPA link|j}}

| {{IPA link|w}}

Though neither Rood nor Garvin include nasals in their respective consonant charts for Wichita, Rood's later inclusion of nasals in phonetic transcription for his 2008 paper ("Some Wichita Recollections: Aspects of Culture Reflected in Language") support the appearance of at least {{IPA|/n/}}.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

* [[labial consonant|Labials]] are generally absent, occurring in only two roots: '''kammac''' ''to grind corn'' and '''camma:ci''' ''to hoe, to cultivate'' (⟨c⟩ = {{IPA|/t͡s/}}).

* Apart from the {{IPA|/m/}} in these two verbs, [[Nasal stop|nasals]] are allophonic. The allophones {{IPA|[ɾ]}} and {{IPA|[n]}} are in [[complementary distribution]]: It is {{IPA|[n]}} before alveolars ({{IPA|/t, ts, s/}} and in geminate {{IPA|[nn]}}) and initially before a vowel, and {{IPA|[ɾ]}} elsewhere. Thus its initial consonant clusters are {{IPA|[n]}} and {{IPA|[ɾ̥h]}}, and its medial & final clusters are {{IPA|[nts], [nt], [ns], [nn], [ɾʔ], [ɾh]}}.

* Glottalized final consonants: One aspect of Wichita phonetics is the occurrence of glottalized final consonants. Taylor asserts that when a long vowel precedes a glottal stop (ʔ), there is no change to the pronunciation. However, when the glottal stop is preceded by a short vowel, the vowel is eliminated. If the short vowel was preceded by a consonant, then the consonant is glottalized. Taylor hypothesizes that these glottalized final consonants show that the consonant was not originally a final consonant, that the proto form (an earlier language from which Wichita split off, that Taylor was aiming to reconstruct in his paper) ended in a glottal stop, and that a vowel has been lost between the consonant and glottal stop.{{sfn|Taylor|1963}}

! Original word ending

! Wichita example

| {{IPA|[Vːʔ#]}}

| No change

| {{IPA|[Vːʔ#]}}

| {{IPA|[VːVʔ#]}}

| {{IPA|[Vːʔ#]}}

| {{IPA|[hijaːʔ]}} (snow)

| {{IPA|[CVʔ#]}}

| {{IPA|[Cʔ#]}}

| {{IPA|[kiːsʔ]}} (bone)

* Taylor also finds that previous phonetic transcriptions have recorded the phoneme {{IPA|/ts/}} (aka {{angbr|c}}), as occurring after {{IPA|/i/}}, while {{IPA|/s/}} is recorded when preceded by {{IPA|/a/}}.{{sfn|Taylor|1963}}

** In Wichita the sounds {{IPA|/kʷ/}} and {{IPA|/w/}} are not differentiated when they begin a word, and word-initial *p has become {{IPA|/w/}}. This is unusual, in that the majority of Caddoan languages pronounce words that used to begin with *w with {{IPA|/p/}}. In Wichita, the three sounds were also merged when preceded by a consonant. Wichita shifted consonant initial *p to {{IPA|/kʷ/}} with other medial occurrences of *p. {{IPA|/kʷ/}} and {{IPA|/w/}} remain distinct following a vowel. For example, the word for 'man' is {{IPA|/wiːt͡s/}} in Wichita, but {{IPA|/piːta/}} in South Band Pawnee and {{IPA|/pita/}} in Skiri Pawnee.{{sfn|Taylor|1963}}

===Phonological rules===

{{interlinear|indent=3|ti-r-tar-s|c1= → ''ticac''|IND-PL-cut-IMPERF|'he cut them'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|a:ra-r-tar|c1= → ''a:racar''|PERF-PL-cut|'he has cut them'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|a:ra-tar|c1= → ''a:ratar''|PERF-cut|'he has cut it'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|i-s-wa|c1= → ''iskwa''|IMP-you-go|'go!'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|i-t-wa|c1= → ''ickwa''|IMP-I-go|'let me go!'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|ti-r-kita-re:sʔi|c1= → ''tihkitare:sʔi''|IND-COL-top-lie.INAN|'they are lying on top'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|keʔe-t-rika:s-ti:kwi|c1= → ''keʔecika:sti:kwi''|FUT-I-head-hit|'I will hit him on the head'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|ta-t-r-taʔas|c1= → ''taccaʔas''|IND-I-COL-bite|'I bit them'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|ti-ʔak-tariyar-ic|c1= → ''taʔastariyaric''|IND-PL-cut.randomly-repeatedly|'he butchered them'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3|ichiris-ye:ckeʔe:kʔa|c1= → ''ichirisse:ckeʔe:kʔa''|bird-ember|'redbird'}}<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337" />

Wichita has either three or four vowels, depending on analysis:{{sfn|Taylor|1963}}<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337" /><ref name="Garvin, 1950, p. 179-184" />

Though Rood employs the letter {{angbr|o}} in his transcriptions,<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" /> Garvin instead uses {{angbr|u}}, and asserts that {{IPA|/u/}} is a separate phoneme.<ref name="Garvin, 1950, p. 179-184" /> However, considering the imprecision in vowel sound articulation, what is likely important about these transcriptions is that they attest to a back vowel that is not low.

Taylor uses Garvin's transcription in his analysis, but theorizes a shift of *u to {{IPA|/i/}} medially in Wichita, but does not have enough examples to fully analyze all the possible environments. He also discusses a potential shift from *a to {{IPA|/i/}}, but again, does not have enough examples to develop a definitive hypothesis. Taylor finds {{IPA|/ɛ/}} only occurs with intervocalic glottal stops.{{sfn|Taylor|1963}}<ref name="Garvin, 1950, p. 179-184" />

Rood argues that {{IPA|[o]}} is not phonemic, as it is often equivalent to any vowel + {{IPA|/w/}} + any vowel. For example, {{IPA|/awa/}} is frequently contracted to {{IPA|[óː]}} (the high tone is an effect of the elided consonant). There are ''relatively'' few cases where speakers will not accept a substitution of vowel + {{IPA|/w/}} + vowel for {{IPA|[o]}}; one of them is {{IPA|[kóːs]}} 'eagle'.{{clarify|reason=Is this saying that [kóːs] would NOT be understood to mean "eagle"?|date=June 2021}}

(Note that it is common in many languages to use prosodic lengthening with demonstratives such as 'there' or 'that'.)<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337" />

This contrasts with Mixe, where it is easy to find a three-way length contrast without the addition of morphemes.<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337" />

Under Rood's analysis, then, Wichita has 9 phonemic vowels:<ref name="Rood, 1975, p. 315-337" />

Wichita is an agglutinative, polysynthetic language, meaning words have a root verb basis to which information is added; that is, morphemes (affixes) are added to verb roots. These words may contain subjects, objects, indirect objects, and possibly indicate possession. Thus, surprisingly complex ideas can be communicated with as little as one word. For example, {{IPA|/kijaʔaːt͡ssthirʔaːt͡s/}} means "one makes himself a fire".<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

Nouns do not distinguish between singular and plural, as this information is specified as part of the verb. Wichita also does not distinguish between genders, which can be problematic for English language translation.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

Sentence structure is much more fluid than in English, with words being organized according to importance or novelty. Often the subject{{clarify|reason=slSee example and next use of the word "subject" after the example.|date=June 2021}} of the sentence is placed initially. Linguist David S. Rood, who has written many papers concerning the Wichita language, recorded this example, as spoken by Bertha Provost (a native speaker, now deceased) in the late 1960s.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

{{interlinear|indent=3

|hiɾaːwisʔihaːs kijariːt͡seːhiɾeːweʔe hikaʔat͡saːkikaʔakʔit͡saki hiɾaːɾʔ tiʔi naːkiɾih

|Old.time.people God When.he.made.us.dwell Earth This Where.it.is.located

|"When God put our ancestors on this earth."}}

The subject{{clarify|reason=It looks like "subject" is being used to refer to something pragmatic like topic, or possibly to an absolutive-case-like role, rather than to the nominative-case-like role the word "subject" usually refers to in linguistics.|date=June 2021}} of the sentence is ancestors, and thus the sentence begins with it, instead of God, or creation (when.he.made.us.dwell). This leads one to conclude Wichita has a largely free word-order, where parts of the sentence do not need to be located next to each other to be related.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

Wichita has no indirect speech or passive voice. When using past tense, speakers must indicate if this knowledge of the past is based in hearsay or personal knowledge. Wichita speakers also use a morpheme which amounts to two versions of "we"; one that includes the listener, and one that does not. Wichita also differentiates between singular, dual and plural number, instead of the simpler singular or plural designations commonly found.<ref name="Rood, 2008, p. 395-405" />

| aorist quotative || aːʔa ... ki-{{clarify|date=February 2014}}

| future || keʔe-

| future imperative || kiʔi-

| optative || kaʔa-

| too late || -iːhiːʔ

<ref name="Rood, David S. 1976">{{harvnb|Rood|1976}}</ref>

# '''ika:rá:hir''' 'with a rock' (ika:ʔa 'rock')

# '''kirikirʔi:sá:hir''' 'in Wichita (the language)' (kirikirʔi:s 'Wichita)

# '''iskiʔo:rʔeh''' 'hold me in your arms' (iskiʔ 'imperative 2nd subject, 1st object'; a 'reflexive possessor'; ʔawir 'arm'; ʔahi 'hold').

# '''keʔese:cʔíriyari''' 'you will shake your head' (keʔes 'future 2nd subject'; a 'reflexive possessor'; ic 'face'; ʔiriyari 'go around'. Literally: 'you will go around, using your face').

One of these [[tense-aspect-mood|tense-aspect prefixes]] must occur in any complete verb form.<ref name="Rood, David S. 1976" />

| aorist (general past tense) || a...ki

| subjunctive || ha...ki

| optative || kaʔa

| future || keʔe

| future imperative || kiʔi

| negative indicative || ʔa

Note: kara (ought), alone, always means 'subject should', but in complex constructions it is used for hypothetical action, as in 'what would you do if...')

ʔarasi 'cook'

| á:kaʔarásis || quotative aorist imperfective || I heard she was cooking it

| kiyakaʔarásis || quotative aorist imperfective || I heard she was cooking it

| á:kaʔarásiki || quotative aorist perfective || I heard she was cooking it

| á:kaʔarásistaris || quotative aorist intentive || I heard she was planning on cooking it

| kiyakaʔarásistaris || quotative aorist intentive || I heard she was planning on cooking it

| á:kaʔarásiki:ss || quotative aorist generic || I heard she always cooked it

| kiyakaʔarásiki:ss || quotative aorist generic || I heard she always cooked it

| ákaʔárasis || aorist imperfective || I know myself she was cooking it

| ákaʔárasiki || aorist perfective || I know myself she cooked it

| ákaʔarásistaris || aorist intentive || I know myself she was going to cook it

| ákaʔaraásiki:ss || aorist generic || I know myself she always cooked it

| keʔárasiki || future perfective || She will cook it

| keʔárasis || future imperfective || She will be cooking it

| keʔárasiki:ss|| future generic || She will always cook it

| ehéʔárasiki || quotative future perfective || I heard she will cook it

| ehéʔárasis || quotative future imperfective || I heard she will be cooking it

| eheʔárasiki:ss || quotative future generic || I heard she will always be the one to cook it

| taʔarásis || indicative imperfective || She is cooking it; She cooked it

| taʔarásistaris || indicative intentive || She's planning to cook it

| taʔarásiki::s || indicative generic || She always cooks it

| aʔarásis || directive imperfective || Then you cook it

| haʔarásiki || imperative imperfective || Let her cook it

| ki:ʔárasiki || future imperative perfective || Let her cook it later

| ki:ʔárasiki:ss || future imperative generic || You must always let her cook it

| á:raʔarásiki || quotative perfect perfective || I heard she cooked it

| á:raʔarásistaris || quotative perfect intentive || I heard she was going to cook it

| áraʔárasiki || perfect perfective || I know she cooked it

| keʔeʔárasis || optative imperfective || I wish she'd be cooking it

| keʔeʔárasiki || optative perfective || I wish she'd cook it

| keʔeʔárasistaris || optative intentive || I wish she would plan to cook it

| keʔeʔárasiki:ss || optative generic || I wish she'd always cook it

| keʔeʔárasiki:hi:ʔ || optative too late || I wish she had cooked it

| karaʔárasis || ought imperfective || She ought to be cooking it

| karaʔarásiki:ss || ought generic || She should always cook it

| karaʔárasiski:hiʔ || ought too late || She ought to have cooked it

| ta:wʔic || few

| tiʔih || this

| tiʔikhánthirisʔih || yesterday

| chih á:kiʔí:rakhárisʔí:h || suddenly

| ti:ʔ || at once

| tiʔrih || here

| ʔir || in a direction

| kataskeʔer || through the yard

| kataskeʔero:c || out the other way from the yard

<ref name="colorado.edu">{{Cite web |title=Archived copy |url=http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/SketchofWichita.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923235954/http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/SketchofWichita.pdf |archive-date=2015-09-23 |access-date=2014-02-22}}</ref>

<ref name="Rood, David S. 1976" />

** '''ika:rá:hir''' 'with a rock' (ika:ʔa 'rock')

{{interlinear|lang=wic|indent=3

|top= ika:kíyah

|ika:ʔa -kiyah

|rock LOC

|'where the rock is'}}

But a few take the verbal {{transliteration|wic|italic=no|-hirih}}:

{{interlinear|lang=wic|indent=3

|top= hánnhirh

|hir-ahrʔa -hirih

|ground LOC

|'on the ground'}}

Any verbal participle (i.e. any sentence) can be converted to a locative clause by the suffix {{transliteration|wic|italic=no|-hirih}}

* '''{{transliteration|wic|italic=no|tihe:ha}}''' 'it is a creek'

* '''{{transliteration|wic|italic=no|nahe:hárih}}''' 'where the creek is'

===Predicates and arguments===

Wichita is a polysynthetic language. Almost all the information in any simple sentence is expressed by means of bound morphemes in the verb complex. The only exception to this are (1) noun stems, specifically those functioning as agents of transitive verbs but sometimes those in other functions as well, and (2) specific modifying particles. A typical sentence from a story is the following:<ref name="colorado.edu" />

{{interlinear|indent=2

|top= wá:cʔarʔa kiya:kíriwa:cʔárasarikìtàʔahí:rikss niya:hkʷírih

|wa:cʔarʔa {} kiya+ a...ki+ a+ Riwa:c+ ʔaras+ Ra+ ri+ kita+ ʔa+ hi:riks+ s {} na+ ya:k+ r+ wi+ hrih

|squirrel {} QUOT AOR {{gcl|PVB|preverb}} {big (quantity)} meat COL {{gcl|PORT|portative}} top come {{gcl|REP|repetitive}} IPFV {} PTCP wood COL {be upright} LOC

|'The squirrel, by making many trips, carried the large quantity of meat up into the top of the tree, they say.'}}

Note that ''squirrel'' is the agent and occurs by itself with no morphemes indicating number or anything else. The verb, in addition to the verbal units of quotative, aorist, repetitive, and imperfective, also contain morphemes that indicate the agent is singular, the patient is collective, the direction of the action is to the top, and all the lexical information about the whole patient noun phrase, "big quantity of meat."

The verb 'have, possess' in Wichita is /uR ... ʔi/, a combination of the preverb 'possessive' and the root 'be'. Possession of a noun can be expressed by incorporating that noun in this verb and indicating the person of the possessor by the subject pronoun:<ref>Rood, David S. "Agent and object in Wichita." ''Lingua'' 28 (1971-1972): 100. Web. 14 Feb. 2014</ref>{{sfn|Rood|1996}}

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= natí:ʔakʔih

|na- t- uR- ʔak- ʔi- h

|PTCP 1.SBJ POSS wife be SUBORD

|'my wife'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= niye:s natí:kih

|niye:s na- t- uR- ʔiki- h

|child PTCP 1.SBJ- POSS be.PL SUBORD

|'my children'}}

Those uncountable nouns that are also liquids are marked as such by a special morpheme, ''kir''.

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= ta:tí:sa:skinnaʔas

|ta i a: ti:sa:s kir ri ʔa s

|IND 3.SBJ PVB medicine liquid PORT come IPFV

|'He is bringing (liquid) medicine'}}

Those incountable nouns that are not liquid are not otherwise marked in Wichita. This feature is labeled dry mass. Forms such as ''ye:c'' 'fire', ''kirʔi:c'' 'bread', and ''ka:hi:c'' 'salt' are included in this category.

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= tà:yè:csàʔas

|ta i a: ya:c ri ʔa s

|IND 3.SBJ PVB fire PORT come IPFV

|'He is bringing fire.'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= ta:ká:hi:csaʔas

|ta i a: ka:hi:c ri ʔa s

|IND 3.SBJ PVB salt PORT come IPFV

|'He is bringing salt.'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= ta:rássaraʔas

|ta i a: aʔas ra ri ʔa s

|IND 3.SBJ PVB meat COL PORT come IPFV

|'He is bringing meat.'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= ta:rássaʔas

|ta i a: aʔas ri ʔa s

|IND 3.SBJ PVB meat PORT come IPFV

|'He is bringing (one piece of) meat.'}}

Some of the noncollective nominals are also marked for other selectional restrictions. In particular, with some verbs, animate nouns (including first and second person pronouns) require special treatment when they are patients in the sentence. Whenever there is an animate patient or object of certain verbs such as ''u...raʔa'' 'bring' or ''irasi'' 'find', the morpheme |hiʔri|(/hirʔ/, /hiʔr/, /hirʔi/) also occurs with the verb. The use of this morpheme is not predictable by rule and must be specified for each verb in the language that requires it.

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= tí:rass

|ta i irasi s

|IND 3.SBJ find IPFV

|'He found it (inanimate).'}}

{{interlinear|indent=3

|top= tihirʔí:rass

|ta i hirʔi irasi s

|IND 3.SBJ {patient is animate} find IPFV

|'He found it (animate).'}}

Like ''hiʔri'' 'patient is animate', the morpheme ''wakhahr'', means 'patient is an activity'.

The noncollective plural is usually |ʔak|. Instead of a morpheme here, some roots change form to mark plural. Examples include:

| ʔarasi

| wa:rasʔi:rʔ

| kaʔac

| ʔa

| ʔessa

A surface structure object in the non-third-person category can be clearly marked as singular, dual, or plural. The morpheme ''ra:k'' marks plurality; a combination oh ''hi'' and ''ʔak'' marks dual. Singular is marked by zero.

If both agent and patient are third person, a few intransitive verbs permit the same distinctions for patients as are possible for non-third objects: singular, dual, and plural. These verbs (such as 'come' and 'sit') allow the morpheme ''wa'' to mark 'dual patient'. In all other cases the morphemes ''ru'', ''ra'', ''r'', or ''ʔak'' means 'patient is plural'.

* |ʔak| third person patient is nonsingular

* |hi ... ʔak| non-third-person is dual

* |ra:kʔak| combine meanings of ''ra:k'' and ''ʔak''

* zero singular{{sfn|Rood|1996}}

According to the Ethnologue Languages of the World website, the Wichita language is "dormant", meaning that no one has more than symbolic proficiency.<ref name="Ethnologue">{{Cite web |title=Wichita |url=https://www.ethnologue.com/language/WIC |access-date=29 January 2020 |website=Ethnologue |language=en}}</ref> The last native speaker of the Wichita language, Doris Jean Lamar McLemore, died in 2016. The reason for the language's decline is because the speakers of the Wichita language switched to speaking English. Thus, children were not being taught Wichita and only the elders knew the language. "Extensive efforts to document and preserve the language" are in effect through the Wichita Documentation Project.

* {{Cite journal |last=Garvin |first=Paul L. |date=1950 |title=Wichita I: Phonemics |journal=International Journal of American Linguistics |volume=16 |issue=4 |pages=179–184 |doi=10.1086/464086 |s2cid=143828845}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Rood |first=David S. |year=1975 |title=The Implications of Wichita Phonology |journal=Language |volume=51 |issue=2 |pages=315–337 |doi=10.2307/412858 |jstor=412858}}

* {{Cite book |last=Rood |first=David S. |title=Wichita grammar |publisher=Garland |year=1976 |isbn=978-0-8240-1972-3 |location=New York}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Rood |first=David S. |date=2008 |title=Some Wichita Recollections: Aspects of Culture Reflected in Language |journal=Plains Anthropologist |volume=53|issue=208 |pages=395–405 |doi=10.1179/pan.2008.029 |s2cid=143889526}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Taylor |first=Allan R. |date=1963 |title=Comparative Caddoan |journal=International Journal of American Linguistics |volume=29|issue=2 |pages=113–131 |doi=10.1086/464725 |s2cid=224809647}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Rood |first=David S. |year=1971a |title=Agent and object in Wichita |journal=Lingua |volume=28|pages=100–107 |doi=10.1016/0024-3841(71)90050-7}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Rood |first=David S. |year=1971b |title=Wichita: An unusual phonology system |url=https://journals.colorado.edu/index.php/cril/article/view/3 |journal=Colorado Research in Linguistics |volume=1|pages=R1–R24 |doi=10.25810/a3tf-4246 |doi-access=free}}

* {{Cite book |last=Rood |first=David S. |title=You Take the High Node and I'll Take the Low Node: Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, the Differences between Main and Subordinate Clauses |publisher=Chicago Linguistics Society |year=1973 |editor-last=Corum |editor-first=Claudia |location=Chicago |pages=71–88 |chapter=Aspects of subordination in Lakhota and Wichita |lccn=73085640 |editor-last2=Smith-Stark |editor-first2=T. Cedric |editor-last3=Weiser |editor-first3=Ann}}

* {{Cite book |last=Rood |first=David S. |title=Studies in Southeastern Indian Languages |publisher=University of Georgia Press |year=1975b |isbn=978-0-8203-0334-5 |editor-last=Crawford |editor-first=James M. |location=Athens |pages=121–134 |chapter=Wichita verb structure: Inflectional categories}}

* {{Cite book |last=Rood |first=David S. |title=[[Handbook of North American Indians]] |year=1996 |volume=17 |pages=580–608 |chapter=Sketch of Wichita, a Caddoan language}}

* {{Cite book |last=Rood |first=David S. |title=Studies in American Indian Languages: Description and Theory |publisher=University of California Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-520-09789-6 |editor-last=Hinton |editor-first=Leanne |location=Berkeley |pages=190–196 |chapter='To be' in Wichita |lccn=98023535 |editor-last2=Munro |editor-first2=Pamela}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Rood |first=David S. |year=2015 |title=Wichita texts |journal=International Journal of American Linguistics |series=Native American Texts Series |volume=2 |issue=1|pages=91–128 |isbn=9780226343914 |orig-year=1977}}

* {{Cite book |last=Schmitt |first=Karl |title=Wichita kinship past and present |last2=Schmitt |first2=Iva Ósanai |publisher=University Book Exchange |year=1952 |location=Norman, OK |lccn=54000195}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Spier |first=Leslie |year=1924 |title=Wichita and Caddo relationship terms |journal=American Anthropologist |volume=26|issue=2 |pages=258–263 |doi=10.1525/aa.1924.26.2.02a00080}}

* {{Cite journal |last=Vincent |first=Nigel |year=1978 |title=A note on natural classes and the Wichita consonant system |journal=International Journal of American Linguistics |volume=44|pages=230–232 |doi=10.1086/465549 |s2cid=145000151 |number=3}}

* {{Cite report |title=Reports of explorations and surveys to ascertain the most practicable and economic route for a railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean |last=Whipple |publisher=War Department |location=Washington |pages=65–68 |year=1856}} (Information on the [[Waco people|Waco]] dialect)

* [https://web.archive.org/web/20111116085917/https://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/SketchofWichita.pdf Sketch of Wichita, a Caddoan language]

* [http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/ Wichita Language Documentation Project] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606085728/http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/rood-old/Wichita/ |date=2011-06-06 }}

<section begin="list-of-glossing-abbreviations"/><div style="display:none;">

PVB:preverb

PORT:portative (changes motion verb to carry verb)}}

</div><section end="list-of-glossing-abbreviations"/>

{{Native American Tribes in Texas}}

{{authority control}}

[[Category:Extinct languages of North America]]

[[Category:Indigenous languages of Oklahoma]]

[[Category:Languages extinct in the 2010s]]