→Support: sufficient to purpose
|
m →Support: sp.
|
||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
#'''Support''' for a clear [[WP:NETPOS|net positive]]. [[User:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:navy">Mini</span>''''']][[User_talk:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:#8B4513">apolis</span>''''']] 02:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
#'''Support''' for a clear [[WP:NETPOS|net positive]]. [[User:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:navy">Mini</span>''''']][[User_talk:Miniapolis|'''''<span style="color:#8B4513">apolis</span>''''']] 02:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
#'''Support'''. On-and-off activity is not a problem. If he's unresponsive to questions, the bit can be removed. It's [[WP:NOBIGDEAL|not a big deal]]. —<b>[[User:VersaceSpace|<span style="color: black">VersaceSpace</span>]]</b> [[User talk:VersaceSpace|🌃]] 02:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
#'''Support'''. On-and-off activity is not a problem. If he's unresponsive to questions, the bit can be removed. It's [[WP:NOBIGDEAL|not a big deal]]. —<b>[[User:VersaceSpace|<span style="color: black">VersaceSpace</span>]]</b> [[User talk:VersaceSpace|🌃]] 02:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
#'''Support''' They seem competent and not |
#'''Support''' They seem competent and not evil. <span style="color:red">→</span>''[[User:Stanistani|<b style="color:green">Stani</b>]][[User talk:Stanistani|<b style="color:blue">Stani</b>]]'' 03:00, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
=====Oppose===== |
=====Oppose===== |
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (38/6/2); Scheduled to end 16:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
DatGuy (talk · contribs) – Hello everyone. I'd like to nominate myself for adminship, because, well, I think I could help out. A bit about me: I run User:DatBot, who has six active tasks and I'm sure any admins who patrol WP:AIV/TB2 are familiar with. I've created a few articles and helped promote other (mostly Olympics related) articles to GA. You may have seen me around on some seemingly random places, from AIV to ITN to EFN, as I generally prefer to contribute wherever I can rather than place myself in one specific spot.
One thing I'm sure people will be concerned about is my inconsistent activity, or lack thereof. To be 100% truthful, I don't think I'd ever get back to 3000 edits per month that I used to do, but in my opinion my edits now are of higher encyclopaedic quality and contribute more overall. I would also like to mention that when my activity levels were lower, I still mostly responded to anyone who looked for me on my talk page or pinged me.
Thank you for your consideration and I'm looking forward to hearing the community's input. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
You may ask optional questions below. There is a limitoftwo questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
PhantomTech[talk]
23:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]generally be active, regular, and long-term Wikipedia editors. I also do not think that it is possible for an editor to have
gained the general trust of the communitywith such intermittent editing activity even with AGF. This is not to disparage this editor or their work at all but there is a high bar with a for-life appointment. Vladimir.copic (talk) 22:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]