{{ping|Aza24}} Please send me a wikimail to provide you with the article. Thanks, [[User:Doc Taxon|Doc Taxon]] ([[User talk:Doc Taxon|talk]]) 22:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{u|Doc Taxon}}, I've just done so! Thanks – [[User:Aza24|Aza24]] ([[User talk:Aza24|talk]]) 23:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
::Thank you, just got it!!! [[User:Aza24|Aza24]] ([[User talk:Aza24|talk]]) 01:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
{{tl|resolved}}
== ProQuest ==
Could someone with access to ProQuest can provide a full text or image of those articles [https://www.proquest.com/docview/311602202/2D93AF032C4C4553PQ/30] & [https://www.proquest.com/docview/316275324/2D93AF032C4C4553PQ/24]. Thanks in advance. --[[User:Apoxyomenus|Apoxyomenus]] ([[User talk:Apoxyomenus|talk]]) 12:55, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|Apoxyomenus}} These articles are available at ProQuest in [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ The Wikipedia Library] [https://www.proquest.com/docview/311602202/E29B10A590E44129PQ/1?accountid=196403 here] and [https://www.proquest.com/docview/316275324/CE073262C5E74549PQ/1?accountid=196403 here]. You should have access to them. If not, I can send them to you. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]][[User talk:Bruce1ee|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 13:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|Bruce1ee}} Yeah, that's work. Thank you very much. Regards, --[[User:Apoxyomenus|Apoxyomenus]] ([[User talk:Apoxyomenus|talk]]) 13:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
::{{tl|resolved|—[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]][[User talk:Bruce1ee|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 13:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)}}
== Need a page from a book about Eastern Religions ==
<!-- Brief citation of the requested materials. -->
I just need page 191 of this book published in 1996. If anyone could help me out, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you! [[User:Aleena98|Aleena98]] ([[User talk:Aleena98|talk]]) 15:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
: [[User:Aleena98]] The whole book is available here - [https://archive.org/details/worldreligionsea0000unse] [[User:Akshaypatill|Akshaypatill]] ([[User talk:Akshaypatill|talk]]) 18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
::Unfortunately, it's just a limited preview. Thanks for your effort nonetheless, I think I'll try to buy or find a psychical copy as it's nowhere on the web. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aleena98|Aleena98]] ([[User talk:Aleena98#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aleena98|contribs]]) 18:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::: [[User:Aleena98]] I have it. Give me a few minutes. [[User:Akshaypatill|Akshaypatill]] ([[User talk:Akshaypatill|talk]]) 18:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:::: [[User:Aleena98]], I have uploaded it here - [https://privfile.com/download.php?fid=61d495999c9bc-MTIwNjM=] [[User:Akshaypatill|Akshaypatill]] ([[User talk:Akshaypatill|talk]]) 18:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
::::: {{u|Akshaypatill}} Thank you so, so much! [[User:Aleena98|Aleena98]] ([[User talk:Aleena98|talk]]) 18:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
{{tl|Resolved}}
== Newspapers.com request for current disagreement ==
<!-- Brief citation of the requested materials. -->
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite journal |ref=none |no-tracking=yes<!-- prevents error categorization --> |last=Miller |first=Andrew C. |date=1982-01-25 |title=Reagan judicial appointments on trial |work=The Kansas City Star |publisher= |location= |page=6 |url=https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/678490192/ |access-date=2022-01-04 |isbn= |issn= |oclc= }}
{{refend}}
<!-- Wikipedia articles being improved. -->
For [[List of federal judges appointed by Joe Biden]]
:Darn, ExtraordinaryWrit beat me to it. I presume they'll be posting the link any second. [[User:Silver seren|<span style="color: silver;">Silver</span>]][[User talk:Silver seren|<span style="color: blue;">seren</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 23:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{ec}} (sorry, Silver seren) – {{u|Star Garnet}}, I've clipped it for you; see [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/91860331/reagan-judicial-appointments-on-trial/] and [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/91860386/reagan-judicial-appointments-on-trial/]. (If you didn't already know, you can get Newspapers.com access for free via [[WP:TWL|The Wikipedia Library]]: I've found it quite useful.) [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 23:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
== Proquest Historical Newspapers: Times of India ==
<!-- Brief citation of the requested materials. -->
*https://www.proquest.com/docview/499901382
*https://www.proquest.com/docview/506282061
*https://www.proquest.com/docview/517922595
*https://www.proquest.com/docview/738992216
<!-- Wikipedia articles being improved. -->
For [[Ram Chandra Kak ]]. Ping {{ping|Mdaniels5757}}
Thanks, [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 20:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
:{{doing}} {{ping|TrangaBellam}} I can get these for you. Send me an [[Special:EmailUser/WikiLinuz|email]], I'll reply with the attachments. Thanks. [[User:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:JetBrains Mono;color:#292928;">WikiLinuz</span>]] ([[User_talk:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:JetBrains Mono;color:#292928;">talk</span>]]) 22:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
::@[[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] Do you still need these/did you get these? —‍[[User:Mdaniels5757|Mdaniels5757]] ([[User talk:Mdaniels5757|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mdaniels5757|contribs]]) 18:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
{{ping|TrangaBellam}} Did you receive it? [[User:Doc Taxon|Doc Taxon]] ([[User talk:Doc Taxon|talk]]) 09:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
:{{re|Doc Taxon}} - Not yet. Missed this thread. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 11:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|TrangaBellam}} WikiLinuz, who offered them to you, may not be watching this thread after ten weeks of silence from you, but if you email me, I can send them to you. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 16:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] Sent. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 17:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
::::{{ping|TrangaBellam}} sent. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 18:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::{{tl|resolved}} It went to my spam folder! [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 19:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
==Astronomy and Astrophysics==
Greetings, has someone access to these publications?
:{{ping|Doc Taxon}} The first article is available in [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ The Wikipedia Library]: type the article title into the search bar at the top of the page. You should have access to it. If not, I can send it to you. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]][[User talk:Bruce1ee|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 13:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:: {{ping|Bruce1ee}} okay, the first works, but the second not ... [[User:Doc Taxon|Doc Taxon]] ([[User talk:Doc Taxon|talk]]) 15:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
{{tl|resolved}} with many thanks -- [[User:Doc Taxon|Doc Taxon]] ([[User talk:Doc Taxon|talk]]) 14:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
== WSJ book review ==
<!-- Brief citation of the requested materials. -->
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite web |last1=Yost |first1=Mark |title=‘The Guns of John Moses Browning’ Review: The Edison of Modern Firearms |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-guns-of-john-moses-browning-review-the-edison-of-modern-firearms-11621001332 |website=The Wall Street Journal|no-tracking=yes}}
{{refend}}
<!-- Wikipedia articles being improved. -->
For [[The Guns of John Moses Browning]]
Thanks, [[User:Loafiewa|Loafiewa]] ([[User talk:Loafiewa|talk]]) 04:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{u|Loafiewa}}, this should be available for free through [[WP:TWL|the Wikipedia Library]]: sign in [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ here], click on ProQuest, and copy the article's title into the search bar. Let us know if that doesn't work. Cheers, [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 04:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{tl|resolved|—[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]][[User talk:Bruce1ee|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 09:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)}}
== 1995 JAMA article ==
<!-- Brief citation of the requested materials. -->
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite journal |ref=none |no-tracking=yes<!-- prevents error categorization --> |doi = 10.1001/jama.1995.03520350073034 |last= Lundberg |first= George |date= March 15, 1995 |title= And Then There Were None: The Demise of National Medical Television |work= JAMA |volume = 273 |issue=11 |page= 891 |url= |access-date= |isbn= |issn= |oclc= }}
{{refend}}
<!-- Wikipedia articles being improved. -->
For ongoing draft article to be located at [[Lifetime Medical Television]]. See [[User:Sammi Brie/Lifetime Medical Television]].
::{{tl|resolved|—[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]][[User talk:Bruce1ee|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 09:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)}}
Latestrevisionasof10:59,6January2022
This is an archive of past requests. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new request or revive an old one, please do so on the Resource Request page.
SusunW, the article should be available through EBSCO in The Wikipedia Library: try copying the title into the new search bar at the top of this page. If that doesn't work, just email me and I'll send you the PDF. Best regards, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
no, but if so, let's wait on Hans (comic book) and I try to get the whole Dictionnaire. But I can't promise to get it yet. Doc Taxon (talk) 14:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: email me if you'd like to see what the 1997 edition says about Hans and Thorgal. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For To Fly!. Looking for Chapter 6 "Daguerreotype to IMAX Screen: Multimedia and IMAX at the Smithsonian Institution", and if possible the chapter's footnotes.
Thanks, GeraldWL 14:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doing... please send me a wikimail to provide you the chapter. Thanks, Doc Taxon (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doc Taxon, as in email? If so it's stated in my userpage (gelhikaru6666@gmail.com). GeraldWL 02:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doc Taxon, nvm, sorry didn't get it at first. Sent you a wikimail. GeraldWL 04:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...Or am I doing this right? Cause I can't seem to find my email in my Gmail. Sorry, practically my first time. GeraldWL 04:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Erick (talk) 03:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Magiciandude:Sent the ones I could easily find, which were all of the "Esperanza" ones, #3 for "Dejaría Todo", both of the "Corazon Partido" ones, and #1 and #2 for "Clavado en un Bar". DanCherek (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Thanks! The article for "Clavado en un Bar" with Mario Tarradell's review is missing a line from the ProQuest article: "the CD's lead single, is a propulsive, pop-punk track guaranteed to induce..." Erick (talk) 00:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't understand the question, or maybe I'm looking at a different ProQuest version than you? When I click on [1] I see an abstract that starts with "Suenos Liquidos recalls the pop-friendly sound..." and ends with "...acts languishing in obscurity." but doesn't contain the sentence you mentioned. DanCherek (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Could be the latter (a different version of the article). I found that sentence on when I was searching on ProQuest. See if that works. Erick (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I see it now. My guess is it's some kind of subheadline, but I don't know how to get the rest of it. DanCherek (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: That's fine, I'll strike it down anyways. Let me get back to you to check on the other articles. Erick (talk) 00:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Magiciandude: I sent you some of these, although I fear all I did was partially or entirely duplicative of DanCherek's work. Can you strike out the requests you no longer need, to clarify what part of your request is still open? John M Baker (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Erick: Sent 7: all 3 for "Esperanza", #1 for "Dejaría Todo", remaining 2 for "Corazon Partido", and #2 for "Clavado en un Bar". --Worldbruce (talk) 17:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In the article punk rock, I found a source (rockandrollreport.com) whose reliability seems sketchy at best. My Google search indicates that I may be able to replace it with this Bloomsbury book, but of course, Google Books allows me to view only snippets of what I am requesting. Obviously, that is barely if at all enough to understand the context of the pages, so I would like to request chapters 1 and 2. It is more than enough, but should guarantee everything that I may be looking for.
Doing... I try to get it for you. Doc Taxon (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@FreeMediaKid!: Another way to read the entire book is through the WP:TWL database called Berg Fashion Library. You would have to apply for access yourself. It doesn't allow saving or printing, so other people with access can't share the text with you. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to think of a convincing argument for why I should get free access to its sources. The problem is that I rarely write about fashion. In fact, I doubt that I have ever edited anything related to fashion before. Imagine how confident I would feel if my reason for the application were to replace a single source inside a single article for verification purposes. The absolute best kind of reason that comes to mind is one where I may use one of its sources when I so happen to find a fashion-related claim that lacks a reliable source. I would find and verify such claims maybe twice or so a year. This may still not be convincing, but I think they would like it better that I tell them that than claim that I would be citing the publisher's works a lot, even if the latter does benefit a single article. FreeMediaKid$ 06:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RoseCherry64: All of them should be accessible at ProQuest with The Wikipedia Library. There's a specific New York Times database option there. If you can't find them, let me know. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I was able to get all of the articles from there. {{resolved}}RoseCherry64 (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Swedish newspaper's paywalled review of Neurocracy[edit]
@Rotideypoc41352:Sent, but print version and not web version. Feel free to keep this request open if provided document isn't satisfactory. RoseCherry64 (talk) 17:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stine, Whitney; Davis, Bette (1982). Mother Goddam: The Story of the Career of Bette Davis. London: W.H. Allen. ISBN978-0-352-31142-9. OCLC16600617.
For Margaret Herrick. This is a repost of Talk:Margaret Herrick#Bette Davis and Oscar revocation from July, which did not get a response. Herrick is generally credited with naming the Academy Award an "Oscar". However, Academy President Bette Davis said that the statue was called Oscar from her husband's middle name. Though later on, Davis ended up revoking this honor. The citation (given above) for that revocation is a book that looks to be Davis' biography, but it doesn't mention any page number, chapter or quote referencing this statement. Can someone who has access to this book provide the relevant details? Jay(talk) 12:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay: The 1974 edition of this book is available to borrow at the Internet Archive here (free registration required). I don't know if this will help you. —Bruce1eetalk 12:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll wait to see if someone already has an account there. Jay(talk) 04:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay: You can register for an Internet Archive account with a throwaway email if you wish. If not, I can send you screenshot of the pages that mention it. This is for the 1974 edition. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have registered and logged in. However giving a Search gives "Sorry, there was an error with your search. The text may still be processing. Please try again." Can you tell me the page numbers if you have them? Jay(talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay: Pages 73-74 (73 has a background, 74 has the specific text). --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Venkat TL: I have access to this article (from Taylor & Francis Journals). Please Wikimail me and I'll send it to you. —Bruce1eetalk 12:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's the introduction section for both. It's hard to say because Brill isn't working at the moment. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sent See wiki mail --Arhi twi (talk) 17:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have access to that, but I can share with you this. Tyrone Madera (talk) 22:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I already have access to that and it doesn't cover the content I am looking for here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to hear that. Best wishes, Tyrone Madera (talk) 16:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sent See wiki mail --Arhi twi (talk) 17:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone supply a copy of this 1957 New York Times article? It doesn't appear to be covered by my newspapers.com subscription. For a new article on the subject of the obituary. Many thanks - Dumelow (talk) 09:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Resolved}} Thankyou Bruce1ee, once again I did already have access but just couldn't find it. Sorry to have bothered you! All the best for the season - Dumelow (talk) 09:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem ... and all the best to you too. —Bruce1eetalk 09:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Realmaxxver: According to the website, you can access the article for free if you register an account. If you don't want to do that, I can email the PDF to you if you send me a wikimail. DanCherek (talk) 23:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the article also appears to be available through The Wikipedia Library. Just copy the title into the search bar at the top of this page. DanCherek (talk) 23:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Resolved}} Thanks. I will check the WP Library when I am eligible for the library itself (my account in not 6 months old yet; but It will be on January 8). Realmaxxver (talk) 00:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dumelow: This is available in full in the Wikipedia Library, but you need to select ProQuest and search from there. As far as I know, ProQuest is not yet indexed for general searching via the search bar at the top of the page. —Bruce1eetalk 14:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{resolved}} Thankyou DanCherek and Bruce1ee, both methods work fine. I can't believe I forgot to try Internet Archive and look properly in the Wikipedia Library. I swear someday I'll get the hang of this - Dumelow (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neal, Jarrett (2015). "Chapter / Essay 1". What Color Is Your Hoodie?: Essays on Black Gay Identity. Chelsea Station Editions. ISBN978-1-937627-22-5.
Battis, Jes (June 8, 2021). "Chapter 4: Bad Magic: Wizardry and Queer Failures of Communication". Thinking Queerly. Medieval Institute Publications. pp. 127–157. ISBN9781501515330.
Battis, Jes (June 8, 2021). "Chapter 5: Do You Really Want to Snyrt Me? Queer Adolescence in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight". Thinking Queerly. Medieval Institute Publications. pp. 157–189. ISBN9781501515330.
For He-Man's article, to improve the "Queer analysis" section and further showcase the character's queer aspects. With the last source, I'm 90% sure that He-Man isn't mentioned anywhere else in the book. However, I'm not so sure about the first three sources. If anyone has access to the entirety of any of the first three books, please let me know if He-Man—in the context of his queer-coded nature, gay fanbase, and whatnot—is discussed anywhere else.
Thank you in advance for any requests fulfilled. PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:57, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sent #3 (plus another chapter that also mentions He-Man). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdaniels5757: Thank you for the quick reply and going through the trouble of looking through other chapters for any mentions of He-Man. :D From what I read, neither chapter directly relates to the character's implied homosexuality, but I do believe I can still use them. Apparently, this Reagan guy that was president was very influential during the 1980s. PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruce1ee: Wow. That's all I have to say, lol. I had no idea just how useful Wikipedia could be to accessing sources. Thank you for the tip, after having to login, I was able to obtain both chapters. I'll also look if any of the others mention He-Man. Again, thank you! :) --PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdaniels5757: Just got. Thank you so much for your help. I'm really excited to read this one. :D --PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't work, Arhi twi, Bruce1ee, the free preview there doesn't even get you into the actual text of the book. SilverserenC 10:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Silver seren: You need to be logged in to borrow the book. Registration is free – all they want is an email address. You can borrow the book for 1 hour, or 14 days. —Bruce1eetalk 11:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Arhi twi, Bruce1ee, Silver seren I do have an account there and have borrowed books before, usually for just an hour but sometimes for two weeks. I was able to find a few chapters that discuss He-Man in it. Arhi twi, thank you for bringing it to my attention; it never occurred to me that it might have been added there. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PanagiotisZois: Have you got all you need? Can this request be tagged as resolved? —Bruce1eetalk 16:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruce1ee: Yes, thank you. At this point, I either already have them or have gained access to all sources. It's resolved. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 17:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Peacemaker67: The 1996 edition of the book is available to borrow at the Internet Archive here (free registration required). —Bruce1eetalk 07:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is actually the 1998 edition. The description at the IA incorrectly says it's the 1996 edition. —Bruce1eetalk 07:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mohammad, Hasan (2012). Sandvīpa : śikshā-samīkshā (in Bengali). Chittagong: Sandwip Education Society. ISBN9789843345400. OCLC835623433.
To be followed by a request for specific pages.
OR
If you read Bengali or are up for a challenge, any pages mentioning the secondary school "গাছুয়া আদর্শ উচ্চ বিদ্যালয়", possibly shortly before or after pages 231–234, which I believe are about another secondary school on the island.
@Worldbruce, it appears that the AfD you referred to is now closed. Would you still like access to the above material? Best, Tyrone Madera (talk) 22:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tyrone Madera: The requested material would still be useful. The AfD was closed as a speedy keep on procedural grounds, but the article could be renominated at any time. It would be good to improve the article, if the book contains anything that could be used for the purpose. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, has someone access to "Eddy, J. A. (1978). Evidence for a Changing Sun. The New Solar Physics, 17, 11."? I need the "evidence for a changing sun" chapter.
For Homeric Minimum
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: This book is available to borrow at the Internet Archive here (free registration is required). Chapter 2, "Historical and Arboreal Evidence for a Changing Sun", begins on page 11. DanCherek (talk) 03:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These are for The Hidden Case of Ewan Forbes. If they're in the format that needs to be emailed, feel free to use my Email This User feature. Thanks for your help! SilverserenC 01:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Got it! Now just for the other one, which might be a bit more tricky. SilverserenC 06:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Silver seren: My institutional access seems to start including Literary Review articles a year after they are published. If no one else can help you, come back in a year. —Compassionate727(T·C) 16:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that sucks. :P I'll still wait and see if I get lucky with anyone else having access. SilverserenC 18:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pondrom, Lee G. (2018). The Soviet Atomic Project: How the Soviet Union Obtained the Atomic Bomb. World Scientific. p. 385-399, 580-586. ISBN9789813235557.
For Lavrentiy Beria, I want to take more about this man in soviet nuclear project, but I can not confirm the pages. So I take the name and aftermath's pages in the table of content.
Thanks, Aizag (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I request all pages of this article in this particular journal. In addition to the article itself, there should be an additional English abstract on page 141 per HahtiTrust (no full text available) as well as an English table of contents in the journal. The journal is in a few larger international libraries.
@RoseCherry64: I got it for you, please send me a wikimail to provide you with the paper. Kind regards, Doc Taxon (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers p. 126 and The Nuthatches by Erik Matthysen p. 355 for GAN[edit]
Harrap, Simon (2010). Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers. A&C Black Publishers. ISBN9781408134580.
Matthysen, Erik (2010). The Nuthatches. A&C Black Publishers. ISBN9781408128701.
Im not sure if this is the right place. I dont need an entire page, just need to know on Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers p. 126 about the "date" of this ref 7 on the White-browed nuthatch that when did Simon Harrap suggested that the small size, solid undertail-coverts, and marked white supercilium indicate close kinship with the Yunnan nuthatch (Sitta yunnanensis), while I need to know also on The Nuthatches by Erik Matthysen p. 269-270 who proposed and the date (on when he proposed it) on ref 8 on the same article. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:C848:B03D:54C3:FCD7 (talk) 08:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've added full citations for the two books. The White-browed nuthatch entry on pages 125–126 of the first book is available in this Google Book preview. —Bruce1eetalk 08:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've created screendumps of Harrap, pages 125–126 from the above Google Book preview. As you are not a registered Wikipedia user, I can't mail them to you, so I've made them available here. The link is valid for two days. I hope this helps you. —Bruce1eetalk 10:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! This actually helped me fix some error. Would wait for someone to provide the other book The Nuthatches by Erik Matthysen p. 269-270. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:65E0:38A5:3CB9:488 (talk)
That was quick. Thank you for the help, especially since this is from GAN. Wishing you some good health for 2022. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:65E0:38A5:3CB9:488 (talk) 12:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure, and all the best for the new year. I'm tagging this request as resolved. —Bruce1eetalk 12:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek, It seems like it wants to work for me -- it takes me to a page that says "It looks like you are trying to access this page through Wikipedia", but when I click continue, it wants me to sign in with my organizational affiliation, ProQuest account, and password. If I enter Wikipedia for the affiliation, I get an error message saying it found 0 institutes. —valereee (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If that still doesn't work for you, I'm happy to send you the PDF via email. DanCherek (talk) 17:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That did it! Thanks so much! —valereee (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, was that worth the trouble! Loads of biographical info in that article, thanks again Resource Request folks, you guys are awesome! Article is now in mainspace. —valereee (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TrangaBellam:Sent #2. #1 is not available in my library. Hope, someone else will get it for you. Best. --Gazal world (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looking to improve U.S. Route 101 and other United States Numbered Highways articles for their upcoming centennial, and this seems to have potential to plug a lot of uncited content. Looked around on Google Books and they don't have a viewable copy.
"Agis III: Revisions and Reflections" by Ernst Badian[edit]
Ernst Badian, "Agis III: Revisions and Reflections", in Ian Worthington (editor), Ventures into Greek History [Second Australian Symposium on Ancient Macedonian Studies held at the University of Melbourne in July 1991, dedicated to Professor Nicholas Hammond], Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994, pp. 258-293. ISBN9780198149286
Please find access to "From Jovian to Theodosius" in volume 13 of the Cambridge ancient history[edit]
Cameron, Averil; Garnsey, Peter (eds.). "The Cambridge Ancient History: The Late Empire, A.D. 337–425. XIII". Cambridge. ISBN978-0521302005. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Bruce1ee I don't know what happened. I looked there before coming here and asking. But there it is, just as you say. I think my computer is haunted. Anyway, thank you thank you!! {{Resolved}}Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1974 publication with Arabic and Persian poetry[edit]
Tafazzoli, A. (1974). "Some Middle-Persian Quotations in Classical Arabic and Persian Texts". In Ph. Gignoux and A. Tafazzoli (ed.). Mémorial Jean de Menasce. Tehran and Liège: Imprimerie Orientaliste Louvain. pp. 337–349.
For Barbad; I'm fairly certain it includes the only three lines that survive of Barbad's poetry
Could someone with access to ProQuest can provide a full text or image of those articles [19] & [20]. Thanks in advance. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just need page 191 of this book published in 1996. If anyone could help me out, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you! Aleena98 (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, it's just a limited preview. Thanks for your effort nonetheless, I think I'll try to buy or find a psychical copy as it's nowhere on the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleena98 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Doing...@TrangaBellam: I can get these for you. Send me an email, I'll reply with the attachments. Thanks. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TrangaBellam: WikiLinuz, who offered them to you, may not be watching this thread after ten weeks of silence from you, but if you email me, I can send them to you. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc Taxon: The first article is available in The Wikipedia Library: type the article title into the search bar at the top of the page. You should have access to it. If not, I can send it to you. —Bruce1eetalk 13:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruce1ee: okay, the first works, but the second not ... Doc Taxon (talk) 15:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Loafiewa, this should be available for free through the Wikipedia Library: sign in here, click on ProQuest, and copy the article's title into the search bar. Let us know if that doesn't work. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That works. Thanks. Loafiewa (talk) 08:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lundberg, George (March 15, 1995). "And Then There Were None: The Demise of National Medical Television". JAMA. 273 (11): 891. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520350073034.