incoherent; Undid revision 1217051117by2001:E68:5402:87A5:85EB:5E65:A483:8284 (talk)
|
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Just a pointer to an ongoing discussion. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 14:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |
Just a pointer to an ongoing discussion. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 14:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== The replaced current content please Post directly off == |
|||
notified attribution [[Special:Contributions/2001:E68:5402:87A5:85EB:5E65:A483:8284|2001:E68:5402:87A5:85EB:5E65:A483:8284]] ([[User talk:2001:E68:5402:87A5:85EB:5E65:A483:8284|talk]]) 15:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
![]() |
This page is for discussing improvements to the Main Page error-reports page.
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
I know I have my own opinion, but it's worthwhile to preserve the current discussion about the pigache/pulley shoe hook for DYK at Talk:Pigache for future reference. Is there any place where these discussions are kept? do we literally need to link into the page edit record? or is that eventually purged too and the only way to preserve the discussion is to copy/paste everything to the talk page? — LlywelynII 15:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I remember recently we had a discussion around ERRORS about a specific topic where the error wasn't on the mainpage itself per se, but it was in the article. I bring this up as I recently had a second one of these, with this and this being brought up today. I'm thus asking what the scope of ERRORS should be, given this doesn't seem to be going anywhere. The wiki mods seem to be in disagreement over this, specifically @Schwede66: from what I remember opposes putting anything on ERRORS that isn't specifically on the mainpage but the other wiki mod @Amakuru: thinks this is OK. I'm starting a discussion here, is this OK to put errors on ERRORS? Therapyisgood (talk) 01:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you resolve the problem yourself?is no, especially if it’s impacting eligibility, then it’s worthwhile discussing it at Errors. My preference is a "fix it yourself" approach, but some editors lack the confidence to make bold edits. Schwede66 15:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just a pointer to an ongoing discussion. - Dank (push to talk) 14:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]