Aethia is a genus of four small (85–300g) aukletsendemic to the North Pacific Ocean, Bering Sea and Sea of Okhotsk and among some of North America's most abundant seabirds.[2] The relationships between the four true auklets remains unclear. Auklets are threatened by invasive species such as Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) because of their high degree of coloniality and crevice-nesting.
Current accepted taxonomy of the Alcidae with Aethia shown in blue. Modified from Friesen et al. 1996. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 359–367.
The genus Aethia occurs only in the North Pacific and adjacent waters, mainly in the Bering Sea region. Along with Cassin's auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus) they comprise the monophyletic tribe Aethinii. Molecular work has not yet resolved the relationship between the Aethia auklets, but the group is a sister grouptoCassin's auklet, which is, in turn, a sister group to the Fraterculine auks (puffins and rhinoceros auklet).[3]
The genusAethia did not enter into widespread use until the 1960s.[4] Initially, the auklets were placed in Alca,[5] but later reorganized into genera including: Simorhynchus,[6]Phaleris and Cyclorhynchus.[2]Cyclorhynchus is still occasionally used for the parakeet auklet.
The first undisputed auk fossils are from the middle Miocene (15 million years ago).[2] The first Aethia fossils date from the late Miocene (8–13 million years ago)[7] and the four extant species likely diverged rapidly about 5 million years ago.[8]
There are one or two fossil species which lived in the area of today's California during the Late Miocene: Aethia rossmoori Howard, 1968 (Monterrey FormationofOrange County), and an undescribed taxon tentatively placed in this genus.
From the Pliocene there are Aethia barnesi N. A. Smith, 2013 (San Mateo Formation of San Diego County, California, and Aethia storeri N. A. Smith, 2013 (San Mateo Formation of San Diego County, California.
Auklets have a high site fidelity, at both the colony and crevice level, although there can be a high divorce rate of up to 33% in least and crested auklets when both mates survive.[2]
The Winter distribution of auklets is poorly known. Whiskered auklets likely winter near to breeding colonies[10] and many were reported by Aleuts to winter in the general area.[11] Auklets from the northern Bering Sea must move further south because of pack ice surrounding colonies during the winter.[2]
Auklets are typically very social and nest in dense colonies (Parakeet auklets are more dispersed).[2] All have some form of facial ornamentation such as large crests (Whiskered and crested auklets), auricular plumes (all four species), and crested and whiskered auklets have a tangerine-scented odour[2] which may function in mate choice[12] or species recognition, although this requires more study.[13]
All Aethia auklets lay one white egg in a natural crevice and incubate for 25–36 days,[2] after which, a semi-precocial chick emerges and fledges after 25–35 days.[14] Age at first breeding is estimated at 3–5 years.[15]Colony sizes are highly variable, and range from less than 100 individuals to over 1 million, although least and crested auklets tend to nest in greater density than parakeet and whiskered auklets.[16]
Because they nest in crevices, auklets are vulnerable to predation by rats,[17] and have been extirpated from some islands that contained Arctic foxes introduced for farming.[10][18] Eradication of rats from Rat Island was completed in 2008 and 2009.[19]
The large colony at Sirius Point, Kiska Island, Alaska (perhaps the largest auklet colony in the world[2]) experienced almost complete breeding failure in 2001 and 2002 because of rat predation and disturbance[20] and has been the focus of researchers at Memorial University of Newfoundland.[21]
^Storer, R.W. 1960. Evolution of the diving birds. Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress 12: 694–707.
^Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Naturae, 10th ed. Stockholm
^Stejneger, L. 1885. Results of ornithological explorations in the Commander Islands and in Kamtschatka. Bulletin of the United States National Museum No. 29.
^Jones, I.L., 1992. Colony attendance of Least Auklets at St. Paul Island, Alaska: implications for population monitoring. Condor 94, 93–100.
^ abWilliams, J.C., Byrd, G.V. and Konyukhov, N.B. 2003. Whiskered Auklets Aethia pygmaea, foxes, humans and how to right a wrong. Marine Ornithology 31:175-180.
^Murie, O.J. 1959. Fauna of the Aleutian Islands and Alaska Peninsula. North American Fauna 61:1-364.
^Ydenberg, R.C. (1989). "Growth-mortality trade-offs and the evolution of juvenile life histories in the Alcidae". Ecology. 70 (5): 1494–1506. doi:10.2307/1938208. JSTOR1938208.
^Jones, I.L.; Hunter, F.M.; Robertson, G.J.; Williams, J.C.; Byrd, G.V. (2007). "Covariation among demographic and climate parameters in Whiskered Auklets Aethia pygmaea". Journal of Avian Biology. 38 (4): 450–461. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.03895.x (inactive 2024-05-12).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of May 2024 (link)
^Byrd, G.V., Renner, H.M. and Renner, M. 2005. Distribution patterns and population trends of breeding seabirds in the Aleutian Islands. Fisheries Oceanography 14:139-159.
^Atkinson, I.A.E. 1985. The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effects on island avifaunas. In Moors, P.J. (eds.). 1985. Conservation of Island Birds. ICBP Technical Publication No. 3, Cambridge.
^Bailey, E.P. 1993. Introduction of foxes to Alaskan islands - history, effects on avifauna, and eradication. Fish and Wildlife Series Resource Publication 193. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
^U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2007. Restoring wildlife habitat on Rat Island. Environmental Assessment, Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, Anchorage AK. 141pp
