Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 History  





2 Explanation  





3 Psychophysics  





4 See also  





5 References  





6 External links  














Lilac chaser






العربية
Español
Svenska

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Stare at the center cross for at least 30 seconds to experience the phi phenomena of the illusion

The lilac chaser is a visual illusion, also known as the Pac-Man illusion.[1] It consists of 12 lilac (orpink, rose, or magenta), blurred discs arranged in a circle (like the numbers on a clock), around a small black, central cross on a grey background. One of the discs disappears briefly (for about 0.1 seconds), then the next (about 0.125 seconds later), and the next, and so on, in a clockwise direction. When one stares at the cross for at least 30 seconds, one sees three illusions

  1. A gap running around the circle of lilac discs;
  2. Agreen disc running around the circle of lilac discs in place of the gap; and
  3. The green disc running around on the grey background, with the lilac discs having disappeared in sequence.

The illusion was created by Jeremy Hinton some time before 2005. It then spread widely over the internet.[2] It is a visual illusion that demonstrates color adaptation or human visual perception.[3]

The chaser effect results from the phi phenomenon illusion, combined with an afterimage effect in which an opposite color, or complementary color – green – appears when each lilac spot disappears (if the discs were blue, one would see yellow), and Troxler's fading of the lilac discs.

History

[edit]

The illusion was created by Jeremy Hinton sometime before 2005. He stumbled across the configuration while devising stimuli for visual motion experiments. In one version of a program to move a disc around a central point, he mistakenly neglected to erase the preceding disc, which created the appearance of a moving gap. On noticing the moving green-disc afterimage, he adjusted foreground and background colors, number of discs, and timing to optimize the effect.[citation needed]

In 2005 Hinton blurred the discs, allowing them to disappear when a viewer looks steadily at the central cross. Hinton entered the illusion in the European Conference on Visual Perception's Visual Illusion Contest,[4] but was disqualified for not being registered for that year's conference. Hinton approached Michael Bach, who placed an animated GIF of the illusion on his web page of illusions, naming it the "Lilac Chaser", and later presenting a configurable Java version.[5] The illusion became popular on the Internet in 2005.

Explanation

[edit]

The lilac chaser illusion combines three simple, well-known effects, as described, for example, by Bertamini.[6]

  1. The phi phenomenon is the optical illusion of perceiving continuous motion between separate objects viewed rapidly in succession. The phenomenon was defined by Max Wertheimer in the Gestalt psychology in 1912 and along with persistence of vision formed a part of the base of the theory of cinema, applied by Hugo Münsterberg in 1916. The visual events in the lilac chaser initially are the disappearances of the lilac discs. The visual events then become the appearances of green afterimages (see next).
  2. When a lilac stimulus that is presented to a particular region of the visual field for a long time (say 10 seconds or so) disappears, a green afterimage will appear. The afterimage lasts only a short time, and in this case is effaced by the reappearance of the lilac stimulus. The afterimage is a consequence of neural adaptation of the cells that carry signals from the retina of the eye to the rest of the brain, the retinal ganglion cells.[7] According to opponent process theory, the human visual system interprets color information by processing signals from the retinal ganglion cells in three opponent channels: red versus green, blue versus yellow, and black versus white. Responses to one color of an opponent channel are antagonistic to those of the other color. Therefore, a lilac image (a combination of red and blue) will produce a green afterimage from adaptation of the red and the blue channels, so they produce weaker signals. Anything resulting in less lilac is interpreted as a combination of the other primary colors, which are green and yellow.[8]
  3. When a blurry stimulus is presented to a region of the visual field, and we keep our eyes still, that stimulus will disappear even though it is still physically presented. This is called Troxler fading.

These effects combine to yield the sight of a green spot running around in a circle on a grey background when only stationary, flashing lilac spots have been presented.

Psychophysics

[edit]

Psychophysical research has used lilac chaser's properties.[9] Hinton optimized the conditions for all three aspects of the illusion before releasing it. He also noted that the color of the green disc could be outside the color gamut of the monitor on which it was created (because the monitor never displays the green disc, only lilac ones). Michael Bach's version of the illusion allows viewers to adjust some aspects of the illusion. It is simple to confirm that the illusion occurs with other colors.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "The Lilac Chaser aka Pac-Man Illusion". Archived from the original on April 16, 2008.
  • ^ Bach, Michael (2014). "Visual illusions on the internet: 15 years of change in technology and user behaviour". Perception. 43 (9): 873–880. doi:10.1068/p7708. PMID 25420328.
  • ^ DeValois, K. K.; Webster, M. A. (2011). "Color vision". Scholarpedia. 6 (4): 3073. Bibcode:2011SchpJ...6.3073D. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.3073.
  • ^ "European Conference on Visual Perception". Retrieved 16 Oct 2022.
  • ^ Michael Bach. "Lilac Chaser". Michaelbach.de. Archived from the original on 2021-04-28. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
  • ^ Bertamini, M. (2018). "Lilac Chaser Illusion". Programming Visual Illusions for Everyone. Vision, Illusion and Perception. Vol. 2. pp. 153–161. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64066-2_14. ISBN 978-3-319-64065-5.
  • ^ Zaidi, Q.; Ennis, R.; Cao, D.; Lee, B. (2012). "Neural locus of color afterimages. ". Current Biology. 22 (3): 220–224. Bibcode:2012CBio...22..220Z. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.021. PMC 3562597. PMID 22264612.
  • ^ Horner, David. T. (2013). "Demonstrations of Color Perception and the Importance of Colors". In Ware, Mark E.; Johnson, David E. (eds.). Handbook of Demonstrations and Activities in the Teaching of Psychology. Vol. II: Physiological-Comparative, Perception, Learning, Cognitive, and Developmental. Psychology Press. pp. 94–96. ISBN 978-1-134-99757-2. Retrieved 2019-12-06. Originally published as: Horner, David T. (1997). "Demonstrations of Color Perception and the Importance of Contours". Teaching of Psychology. 24 (4): 267–268. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2404_10. ISSN 0098-6283. S2CID 145364769.
  • ^ DeValois, K. K.; Webster, M. A. (2011). "Color vision". Scholarpedia. 6 (4): 3073. Bibcode:2011SchpJ...6.3073D. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.3073.
  • [edit]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lilac_chaser&oldid=1228754106"

    Category: 
    Optical illusions
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1: long volume value
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from October 2023
     



    This page was last edited on 13 June 2024, at 00:34 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki