One round (two half-rounds) of the RC5 block cipher
| |
| General | |
|---|---|
| Designers | Ron Rivest |
| First published | 1994 |
| Successors | RC6, Akelarre |
| Cipher detail | |
| Key sizes | 0 to 2040 bits (128 suggested) |
| Block sizes | 32, 64 or 128 bits (64 suggested) |
| Structure | Feistel-like network |
| Rounds | 1-255 (12 suggested originally) |
| Best public cryptanalysis | |
| 12-round RC5 (with 64-bit blocks) is susceptible to a differential attack using 244 chosen plaintexts.[1] | |
Incryptography, RC5 is a symmetric-key block cipher notable for its simplicity. Designed by Ronald Rivest in 1994,[2] RC stands for "Rivest Cipher", or alternatively, "Ron's Code" (compare RC2 and RC4). The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) candidate RC6 was based on RC5.
Unlike many schemes, RC5 has a variable block size (32, 64 or 128 bits), key size (0 to 2040 bits), and number of rounds (0 to 255). The original suggested choice of parameters were a block size of 64 bits, a 128-bit key, and 12 rounds.
A key feature of RC5 is the use of data-dependent rotations; one of the goals of RC5 was to prompt the study and evaluation of such operations as a cryptographic primitive.[citation needed] RC5 also consists of a number of modular additions and eXclusive OR (XOR)s. The general structure of the algorithm is a Feistel-like network, similar to RC2. The encryption and decryption routines can be specified in a few lines of code. The key schedule, however, is more complex, expanding the key using an essentially one-way function with the binary expansions of both e and the golden ratio as sources of "nothing up my sleeve numbers". The tantalising simplicity of the algorithm together with the novelty of the data-dependent rotations has made RC5 an attractive object of study for cryptanalysts.[according to whom?] RC5 is basically denoted as RC5-w/r/b where w=word size in bits, r=number of rounds, b=number of bytes in the key.
RC5 encryption and decryption both expand the random key into 2(r+1) words that will be used sequentially (and only once each) during the encryption and decryption processes. All of the below comes from Rivest's revised paper on RC5.[3]
The key expansion algorithm is illustrated below, first in pseudocode, then example C code copied directly from the reference paper's appendix.
Following the naming scheme of the paper, the following variable names are used:
# Break K into words
# u = w / 8
c = ceiling(max(b, 1) / u)
# L is initially a c-length list of 0-valued w-length words
for i = b-1 down to 0 do:
L[i / u] = (L[i / u] <<< 8) + K[i]
# Initialize key-independent pseudorandom S array
# S is initially a t=2(r+1) length list of undefined w-length words
S[0] = P_w
for i = 1 to t-1 do:
S[i] = S[i - 1] + Q_w
# The main key scheduling loop
i = j = 0
A = B = 0
do 3 * max(t, c) times:
A = S[i] = (S[i] + A + B) <<< 3
B = L[j] = (L[j] + A + B) <<< (A + B)
i = (i + 1) % t
j = (j + 1) % c
# return S
The example source code is provided from the appendix of Rivest's paper on RC5. The implementation is designed to work with w = 32, r = 12, and b = 16.
void RC5_SETUP(unsigned char *K)
{
// w = 32, r = 12, b = 16
// c = max(1, ceil(8 * b/w))
// t = 2 * (r+1)
WORD i, j, k, u = w/8, A, B, L[c];
for (i = b-1, L[c-1] = 0; i != -1; i--)
L[i/u] = (L[i/u] << 8) + K[i];
for (S[0] = P, i = 1; i < t; i++)
S[i] = S[i-1] + Q;
for (A = B = i = j = k = 0; k < 3 * t; k++, i = (i+1) % t, j = (j+1) % c)
{
A = S[i] = ROTL(S[i] + (A + B), 3);
B = L[j] = ROTL(L[j] + (A + B), (A + B));
}
}
Encryption involved several rounds of a simple function, with 12 or 20 rounds seemingly recommended, depending on security needs and time considerations. Beyond the variables used above, the following variables are used in this algorithm:
A = A + S[0]
B = B + S[1]
for i = 1 to r do:
A = ((A ^ B) <<< B) + S[2 * i]
B = ((B ^ A) <<< A) + S[2 * i + 1]
# The ciphertext block consists of the two-word wide block composed of A and B, in that order.
return A, B
The example C code given by Rivest is this.
void RC5_ENCRYPT(WORD *pt, WORD *ct)
{
WORD i, A = pt[0] + S[0], B = pt[1] + S[1];
for (i = 1; i <= r; i++)
{
A = ROTL(A ^ B, B) + S[2*i];
B = ROTL(B ^ A, A) + S[2*i + 1];
}
ct[0] = A; ct[1] = B;
}
Decryption is a fairly straightforward reversal of the encryption process. The below pseudocode shows the process.
for i = r down to 1 do:
B = ((B - S[2 * i + 1]) >>> A) ^ A
A = ((A - S[2 * i]) >>> B) ^ B
B = B - S[1]
A = A - S[0]
return A, B
The example C code given by Rivest is this.
void RC5_DECRYPT(WORD *ct, WORD *pt)
{
WORD i, B=ct[1], A=ct[0];
for (i = r; i > 0; i--)
{
B = ROTR(B - S[2*i + 1], A) ^ A;
A = ROTR(A - S[2*i], B) ^ B;
}
pt[1] = B - S[1]; pt[0] = A - S[0];
}
Twelve-round RC5 (with 64-bit blocks) is susceptible to a differential attack using 244 chosen plaintexts.[1] 18–20 rounds are suggested as sufficient protection.
A number of these challenge problems have been tackled using distributed computing, organised by Distributed.net. Distributed.net has brute-forced RC5 messages encrypted with 56-bit and 64-bit keys and has been working on cracking a 72-bit key since November 3, 2002.[4] As of July 26, 2023, 10.409% of the keyspace has been searched and based on the rate recorded that day, it would take a little more than 59 years to complete 100% of the keyspace.[5] The task has inspired many new and novel developments in the field of cluster computing.[6]
RSA Security, which had a (now expired) patent on the algorithm,[7] offered a series of US$10,000 prizes for breaking ciphertexts encrypted with RC5, but these contests were discontinued as of May 2007.[4] As a result, distributed.net decided to fund the monetary prize. The individual who discovers the winning key will receive US$1,000, their team (if applicable) will receive US$1,000, and the Free Software Foundation will receive US$2,000.[8]
