This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Animal nutrition is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Sounds like a scholarly article on nutrition by someone with no knowledge or experience of a nutrition. The clue? Nothing about balanced nutrition. 71.100.23.199 (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The tone of the whole article is militantly pro-carnivore. Of what use, for instance, is the violent picture of predation at the top? And why illustrate the paragraph on protein with a picture of meat, which adds nothing in content but just perpetuates the myth that protein is a meat thing? Not to mention the absurd caption - all meats contain all the amino acids, just as all plants do too. David Olivier (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Animal nutrition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
As pointed out in 2013 and still not remedied, this article still has content that strongly overlaps or was directly copied from the (subsequently revised) Nutrition and Human nutrition articles. Minimally, text and referencing need to be brought up to date. And expand beyond agricultural and pet nutrition. Ideally, some effort needed to address the wide scope of animal nutrition ranging from carnivores, omnivores, herbivores, insectivores, parasites, etc. David notMD (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
