Contents

Talk:Apple juice

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Breakfast Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is within the scope of the Breakfast task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jennyqiujie.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 14:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I put a leaf in diluted apple juice and hope that it will grow? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.36.171.210 (talk) 06:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This revert and the statement of no significant nutrient content in apple juice are justified because the FDA labeling guidelines (with no other regulatory or scientific evidence) show in this FDA document, page 94 that a nutrient content is significant only if it is 10% of more of the Daily Value (under "Beneficial nutrients"). In the article - as for other foods - we use the USDA nutrient database, and a reference amount of 100 g (ml) of apple juice. Potassium and manganese have DV contents well below 10%, and therefore are insignificant in content. Zefr (talk) 18:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The FDA document references (page 94) only provides conditions when the word "healthy" may be used (as noted at the top of the page), and in this case at least 10 % DV is needed. But this page does not address significance. That can be found on page 130 in which the "insignificant amount" for vitamins & minerals is "< 2% RDI", and that less than 2% may be expressed as "Not a significant source of _____". This is repeated on page 38. Also, according to [1], nutrients that are <5% DV per serving are considered "low", which is not the same as insignificant. As at least two minerals have >5% DV per a one 8 oz cup serving (which is the serving size of apple juice), not only does apple juice have significant amounts of nutrients, but two nutrients are greater than the "low" threshold.

a note, I don't feel that either of these cases are necessary for this article and any mention of nutrition can be omitted, but to say "no significant" is misleading and comes across as an opinion that is advocating against apple juice, which should not be the point of a Wikipedia article. Antares Geminorum (talk) 19:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nutrient contents are referenced to 100 grams (or ml) for a standard comparison across foods. The nutrition panel for apple juice per 100 ml is remarkable for its relative absence of micronutrient content. FDA guidance to industry for food product labeling includes mention of "moderate" (10-19% DV) or "excellent" (20% DV and higher) nutrient contents in food sources because anything less than 10% is too low - or too "insignificant" - to mention on a product label. For the general Wikipedia user, the article statement about insignificant nutrient content is accurate as stated. For reference, 100 grams of a raw apple has an insignificant content of micronutrients. Zefr (talk) 22:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]