Contents

Talk:Automation bias

Automation bias was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 30, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Logic Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Automobiles Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GrimJimTim.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2018 and 2 May 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): N hatfield.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are probably quite a number of works of fiction that issue that bias - somebody please create a section for it and list some of them. --Fixuture (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Automation bias/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Georgejdorner (talk · contribs) 06:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I began this review by reading the article (of course). The problem being, I couldn't read very far before the article fell apart. The division of Automation bias into errors of omission and commission was a promising start. Then there is that succession of single sentence sections that loses me. I get the feeling that these sentences are all aspects of some point the editor(s) are trying to make, but I'm darned if I can figure what that point is supposed to be. As an offline editor, I would be red penciling a whole string of section titles because they seem like unneeded intrusions. As it is, this article is poorly enough written it becomes incomprehensible.

Sorry, but this is a gross failure of the first criteria. I wish the editor(s) the best of fortune in revamping it. Perhaps somehow sorting the various examples of bias into omissions and commissions? The subject could be intriguing. However, I believe the systemic problems are extensive enough it does not merit a hold for repair. At present I am not sure it even deserves the current Start class assessment.Georgejdorner (talk) 06:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Below are additional sources to supplement the automation complacency section. The section should integrate automation trust literature, to include factors that lead to automation complacency, such as automation reliability. In addition, the page will benefit by discussing differences between automation complacency and bias, first failure effect, trust, and reliable scales that measure automation complacency and trust.

Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407-434.

Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2015). Engineering psychology & human performance. Psychology Press.

Wickens, C. D., Clegg, B. A., Vieane, A. Z., & Sebok, A. L. (2015). Complacency and automation bias in the use of imperfect automation. Human factors, 57(5), 728-739.

N hatfield (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article in 2013 based on the predicted 737 scenario. There are now multiple sources linking the 737 debacle to automation bias. Please add them. Viriditas (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]