 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
In Turkey, mullet roe covered in wax is called "butarka" and known as a kind of "meze" or accompaniment to alcohol. Here is an article of a Turkish newspaper to make my point: http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/tan_morgul/butarka_mumlu_balik_yumurtasi-1113580
I think that "Tarama" should not be handled in this article, since it is just salted mullet roe (and a salad made from it) rather than cured and dried roe as in the case of Butarka, which should to my oppinion be mentioned here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.196.117.215 (talk) 10:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The subject under discussion is a "Mediterranean delicacy".
The paragraph entitled "U.S.A." has no verifiable link nor substance, no geographical relevance and offers no informational value other than that of an advertisement. I propose that the heading and paragraph be deleted.
Ianactually (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bottarga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Its not Bottarga there, its Huevá. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.212.116.112 (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bottarga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The section Names and etymology needs to be rewritten. The sentences『The Italian form is thought to have been introduced from the Arabic buṭarḫah بطارخة (plural buṭariḫ بطارخ), also derives from Byzantine Greek ᾠοτάριχον (oiotárikhon) < ᾠόν 'egg' + τάριχον 'pickled.』 and『It has been suggested that the Coptic outarakhon might be the intermediate form between Greek and Arabic, whereas examination of dialectical variants of Greek ᾠόν 'egg' include Pontic Greek ὠβόν (traditionally where the mullets are caught) and ὀβό or βό in parts of Asia Minor』are not coherent.
Once that is resolved, then it needs to be compared to the lede, which says "It is known as batarekh in Egypt, where the word is known to originate from the Coptic language." If Coptic is intermediate, then "originate" is wrong. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ina series of edits, @99.246.135.183: has converted this from an article with a global perspective to an article about Italian bottarga which has a number of other problems as well:
I reverted this anon's contributions before. I do not want to edit war. Discussion? --Macrakis (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators willbeblocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
