| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brown ale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I nearly wrote: "English commercial examples include Newcastle Brown Ale, which is truly hideous, and Samuel Smith's Nut Brown Ale, which is quite pleasant.", but I thought better of it. ;) Stewartadcock 19:40, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Is there any technical or official meaning of nut brown as opposed to just brown? Or is the usage entirely poetic? VermillionBird 21:39, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Nut browns typically include a high roasted malt such as victory or biscuit malt into the grist which gives the beer a slight toasted nut note to it. This is definitely not a "poetic" usage and is in fact a pretty good descriptor.
Garyfoster, you're making that up. Where's you're evidence? "Nut brown" is brewer marketingspeak, and has no independent meaning at all. Zythophile (talk) 00:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There seem to be a lot of mentions of Mann's, including a rather prominent picture at the top of the page. Additionally, only one external link is provided - to Mann's website. Seems like there's a bit of advertising going on. Am I right, or is it just me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LordDimwit (talk • contribs) 02:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
As Mann´s Brown Ale was the original modern Brown Ale (first brewed in the 1890s), it seems perfectly reasonable for it to be featured prominently in the article.Patto1ro 07:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Manns logo new sm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I fleshed out the style descriptions and variations with descriptions of the major styles of brown ale as recognized by the BJCP. I included reference links to the BJCP online style documentation. Garyfoster 15:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Restored the styles section that I put in, which was removed without explanation. If you're going to undo my work, which I consider a pretty good addition to the article, please at least have the courtesy to give an explanation and open a discussion. Garyfoster 21:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We've had this discussion several times before. The BJCP is not an authority on European beer styles.'06:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patto1ro (talk • contribs)
Could you try looking at the many discussions we've had about the bjcp and European beer styles. They are not an authority on Eurpean beer styles. They are an American homebrewers' organisation. I'm going to take out the references to them again, because that is what was agreed after a long debate. Patto1ro 16:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And furthermore, User:Garyfoster, when discussing whether to include information which may be helpful to readers or excluding it, User:Patto1ro always advocates excluding it — unless it is an external link to his website. — goethean ॐ 16:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the link to the Manns site is dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.153.68 (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Foodorone of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Without objections, I shall link this aticle to the BJCP. BJCP (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brown ale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
