This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Removing『it's callled كمون in Arabic language』 from the Cultivation and Uses section as it appears to just have been plopped dead in the middled of a sentence. Might still be interesting to have somewhere in the article, but it'd be cool if someone could provide a romanized spelling of the word as well.
Added section on etymology and history. The variety of terms used for caraway are mentioned around the web and in print, and various dictionaries and etymology guides list the provenance of the word as "suspicious" with the strongest term indicating certainty used being "probably." (which is to say, nobody is very certain at all) The variety of other words used for caraway is notable. The section isn't great but it's cited (unlike the rest of the article) so I think it's a good addition, and maybe someone else can improve it. 163.246.197.46 (talk) 18:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An editor called me "rude", and I don't blame him, because he didn't know why I did what I did. Another editor had made this edit, and removed some material that he felt needed to be sourced. All I have done now is to return that material (which I had not been the original writer of, I just saw this) and added a citation. Sorry to have come across as rude. 74.178.230.17 (talk) 22:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Caraway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
