This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
It is rather confusing when it says it contains back bacon, but the link is to "fatback" which is a different article than "back bacon" and then the photo is of a cooked piece of "streaky bacon", a third substance. So, which is correct? I don't know, so I can't fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.232.73.129 (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the Guinness reference is a bit too much. While it may be true that people are wont, of course, especially Dubliners, to eat a coddle before a night out, it doesn't necessarily mean that coddle is best served with Guinness. Water or a pint of milk can offset the saltiness of the dish more easily than Guinness.
I'm a Dubliner from [1]Donaghmede; there's no doubt that Guinness was never served with coddle in my day. It's like saying that Toad in the hole is best served with a pint of bitter or that a Spanish omelette is best served with sangria.
At least say, if I'm disagreed with regarding the above to a sufficient degree, that it is best served with stout, rather than a particular brand of stout. Many prefer Beamish or Murphy's... 82.157.192.18700:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Miknolan[reply]
removed altogether as kinda stereotypical touristy stuff. pure WP:OR but i'm irish and a big fan of this dish, and i don't have guinness with it. indeed, to have a proper guinness with it you'd have to have it in a pub and there's not many (perhaps non-tourist, anyway) pubs that serve coddle these days, even in dublin. if someone wants to re-add this, i'd recommend finding a source. --Kaini (talk) 00:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's crept back in. Removing. You could have a stout with it, if you bought it in (one of the few!) pubs that serve it, but yeah - does not contain Guinness or any other stout in any recipe I've ever seen. Removing. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!18:22, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Foodorone of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Coddle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
