Contents

Talk:Estrone

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Estrone article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: MCB This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance). Chemicals: Core High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's Health Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Estrone. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Clemson University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The logvinenkase vandals were back again today.

Please watch for references added to this article which mention:

• logvinenkase, Elena Logvinenko
• Nathan Tek, Nathaniel Tek

Several additional names were also added in today's vandalism; all were from the schedule on this page.

Refer also to Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Logvinenkase. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You found it! I was wondering where all this nonsense was coming from. My best guess was that the names were from some sort of RPG or low budget sci-fi. Now I know where... but my curiosity remains: why? Rhobite 03:07, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

I can't imagine why someone would add the same nonsense back at intervals over such a long period—most vandals don't have anywhere near that kind of attention span. Most curious. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 03:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Does the writer of this article have a source for the Biosynthesis section of this article.

Thanks, Jlukeedwards (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is over-focused on the effects of exposure to high quantities of synthetic estrone while mostly ignoring the biological function of estrone. Sometimes it does not clearly distinguish between the two. There needs to be a section on why estrone is important in pregnancy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.208.174 (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly suggest a throughfully revision of this entry for Estrone. Estrone is before all an endogenous hormone with important role in our metabolism, while here it's rather treated as a poisonous hazard. Please focus more on its actual biological role rather on its effects on the environment and exposure to it. Reading this entry it pretty looks like every women around should already be died by cancer and so on, for it is one of the main estrogens in our body ! So our human specie would have been already extinguished since long, which luckily enough it is not the case... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.40.80 (talk) 22:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are there no ranges in humans? This is VERY incomplete!

There seems to be a problem in that the structure of estriol is different in one place than another. The one in the centre bottom of a diagram of structures shows only two O while the one to the right in another diagram shows three O. Three is correct according to other sites including another Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.202.9.82 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]