This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Feijoa sellowiana article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Um.. I have no idea how wikipedia works and stuff but thought this would be nice :)
I took it so use it however etc. etc. --AndrewTA 13:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The link in "External links" is broken. Vadik wiki 01:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just read in "The Georgian Feast" by Darra Goldstein that Georgians (former Soviet Union) cultivate feijoas. Does anyone have any corroborating evidence? 72.192.135.104 05:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article lack even basic information about nutritional facts of this fruit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.163.242 (talk) 01:47, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This plant and it's fruit grows well in So Cal. Probably should be added to the main wiki page. 72.192.128.18 (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALso, one way to tell if the fruit is ripe is to gently shake the branch. If it falls, its ripe.98.207.230.186 (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Citation needed" on scooping the fruit with a spoon? Seriously, do you need that? Does society as a whole not trust whether fruit is scooped with a spoon? This section of the article has way too many "citation needed" tags; this is not the Oxford English Dictionary. --204.246.229.149 (talk) 15:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Feijoa sellowiana edit.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 3, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-06-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 23:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They grow great in the cooler parts of the Tucson area in AZ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.41.94.79 (talk) 02:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It gets to -40 and -50 there. 100 miles SOUTH of Ulan Ude (closest I've been) I doubt they can even grow apples. Now I know lake Baikal would help even out the weather, but not that much. This thing appears to have been re-cited and re-cited all over the web, but pics or it didn't happen. Anyone have support for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.163.178 (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This species is not native to Colombia, where its is widely planted. Its native range only includes Southern Brazil, Uruguay, Eastern Patraguay and Northestern Argentina. Most sources for this information is in Portuguese, but there are some in English as well.
See: Thorp G and Bieleski R (2002) Feijoas: Origins, Cultivation and Uses. HortResearch, Ed. David Bateman, 87 pp.
Nrosa1977 (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I just foraged/gleaned some feijoa from a parking lot where it had been planted as an ornamental hedge. I had an idea what I had but now thanks to you, I know SOOOO much about pineapple guava. Wikipedia for the win, again and again. jengod (talk) 04:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've encountered "feijoe" on the Web, although I don't know if this is a legitimate variant spelling or the result of someone who kant spel gud. Accordingly, I created a redirect from FeijoetoAcca (plant) — QuicksilverT @ 18:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Updated some redirects (Feijoa, Feijoe) that were pointing at Acca (plant), updated to redirect here. This is under assumption that people are more likely to be searching for the tree species/fruit, and not a synonym for the Acca genus. In any case - added a Template:Redirect pointing at the genus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadishSlice (talk • contribs) 01:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Acca sellowiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: page moved. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Acca sellowiana → Feijoa sellowiana – The species in question was recently reclassified. I have provided links and references in the article, so I will not repeat here. I couldn't rename the articles, since it is telling me the article already exists (it is just a redirect page). Should be an easier way to do this. PametUGlavu (talk) 12:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the infobox, the listed genus, Feijoa, links back to the Feijoa sellowiana article. I'm reading that Acca is synonymous with Feijoa, so I believe the infobox should link to the Acca (plant) article, whether or not the genus is listed as FeijoaorAcca here. ——24.5.252.198 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
https://i.imgur.com/WW40q9e.jpeg
https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=IT2002062753