Contents

Talk:Fugazza

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Merger Proposal

[edit]

I'm proposing that Fugazzetta (literally translated as "little fugazza") and Fugazza con queso (lit. "fugazza with cheese") be merged into Fugazza, with any differences between them described within the single article. The merger has already been proposed on Spanish Wikipedia and I'm recommending the same here. It seems logical given it's all extremely similar content and there's a dearth of information that's better compiled under a single article rather than various stubs (see merging reason 2 - Overlap). I'm happy to wait a few weeks and hear any arguments for or against this, though I imagine given the subject's obscurity that this might just go unnoticed. If that happens, I'll probably be bold and go ahead with a merger. --TheMiddleWest (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]